+- Carlton Supporters Club (http://new.carltonsc.com)
+-- Forum: Princes Park (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: Robert Heatley Stand (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-14.html)
+--- Thread: In Game Action: 2020 AFL Rd 18: Carlton vs Brisbane (/thread-4927.html)
Re: In Game Action: 2020 AFL Rd 18: Carlton vs Brisbane - Lods - 09-19-2020
I think it was a hand to the head from Polson after the initial tackle.
Re: In Game Action: 2020 AFL Rd 18: Carlton vs Brisbane - LoveNavy - 09-19-2020
Hopefully we've had our Off q, and play the next 2q.
And yes, some poor umpiring decisions- all to Lions advantage 9 - 1. Seriously. What are the chances?
Re: In Game Action: 2020 AFL Rd 18: Carlton vs Brisbane - shawny - 09-19-2020
(09-19-2020, 10:45 AM)kruddler link Wrote:If you initiate the high contact, you should not get a free.....unless your name is Joel Selwood.
Rich literally ran into him with his head. NOT polsons fault, Rich's fault. So why penalise Polson?
It’s irrelevant who’s fault it is. You cannot collect a player high.
Is it the tacklers fault that Selwood ducks and the tackler collect him high. Nope but paid every time.
That’s the rule and some players know how to draw fees from it
Re: In Game Action: 2020 AFL Rd 18: Carlton vs Brisbane - LoveNavy - 09-19-2020
Strangely we're getting enough of the ball. Ball use though??
Teague's giving them a big spray ?
Re: In Game Action: 2020 AFL Rd 18: Carlton vs Brisbane - Lods - 09-19-2020
One of the positives for me is Kennedy who is getting some ball and showing a bit of aggression
Re: In Game Action: 2020 AFL Rd 18: Carlton vs Brisbane - laj - 09-19-2020
Teague has gone berserk in the rooms. Lots of F words in that lot. $hit he looked angry.
Re: In Game Action: 2020 AFL Rd 18: Carlton vs Brisbane - kruddler - 09-19-2020
(09-19-2020, 10:49 AM)shawny link Wrote:It’s irrelevant who’s fault it is. You cannot collect a player high.
Is it the tacklers fault that Selwood ducks and the tackler collect him high. Nope but paid every time.
That’s the rule and some players know how to draw fees from it
No
From 2017...
https://www.afl.com.au/news/46561/high-tackle-rule-tweak-wont-see-selwood-change
Quote:Under the new tightened interpretation, if a tackle is reasonable and the ball carrier is responsible for the high contact via a "shrug, drop, arm lift or duck, play on should be called".
If you don't believe me, Murphy tried to do a selwood and the umpire flatly (and loudly) said "NO" as it was clear Murphy contributed to the high contact (as per rule above). - I think it was the freo game.
Re: In Game Action: 2020 AFL Rd 18: Carlton vs Brisbane - percy - 09-19-2020
3 goals from extremely doubtful free kicks, typical and we get nothing from those muppets. The channel 7 commentary makes me spew up.
Re: In Game Action: 2020 AFL Rd 18: Carlton vs Brisbane - Micky0 - 09-19-2020
(09-19-2020, 10:49 AM)shawny link Wrote:It’s irrelevant who’s fault it is. You cannot collect a player high.You cannot run into players with your head ffs!
Is it the tacklers fault that Selwood ducks and the tackler collect him high. Nope but paid every time.
That’s the rule and some players know how to draw fees from it
Umps get your hands off it - that’s two non free kicks resulting in two goals to them. Pathetic.
In saying that, Carlton. Can we please. Stop. Kicking. To.Opposition. Out. Of.defence. Ffs!
Re: In Game Action: 2020 AFL Rd 18: Carlton vs Brisbane - JonDorotich - 09-19-2020
(09-19-2020, 10:52 AM)Lods link Wrote:One of the positives for me is Kennedy who is getting some ball and showing a bit of aggression
Another positive is watching Teague losing it at half time. About time.