Carlton Supporters Club
Pick your best 22 players - Part 8 (Season over - wooden spooners) - Printable Version

+- Carlton Supporters Club (http://new.carltonsc.com)
+-- Forum: Princes Park (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: Robert Heatley Stand (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-14.html)
+--- Thread: Pick your best 22 players - Part 8 (Season over - wooden spooners) (/thread-1674.html)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10


Re: Pick your best 22 players - Part 6 (Back-to-back thumpings 3-14) - Professer E - 08-03-2015

Walker isn't best 22 based on his past 2 seasons, neither is Thomas.  Menzel barely scrapes in.


Re: Pick your best 22 players - Part 6 (Back-to-back thumpings 3-14) - kruddler - 08-16-2015

Results are in....not many people voted during this time, but voters have remained relatively consistent.

Starters
3 - Murphy -    13 (4.5%)
4 - Gibbs -    13 (4.5%)
4 - Gibbs -    13 (4.5%)
6 - Simpson -    13 (4.5%)
8 - Kreuzer -    13 (4.5%)
9 - Cripps -    13 (4.5%)
15 - Docherty -    13 (4.5%)
33 - Everitt -    13 (4.5%)
40 - Jamison -    13 (4.5%)
41 - Casboult -    13 (4.5%)
42 - Tuohy -    13 (4.5%)
7 - Buckley -    12 (4.2%)
28 - Bell -    12 (4.2%)
32 - Graham -    12 (4.2%)

Probables
2 - Menzel -    11 (3.8%)
23 - Henderson -    11 (3.8%)
27 - Armfield -    11 (3.8%)
13 - Yarran -    10 (3.5%)
39 - Thomas -    10 (3.5%)

Possibles
35 - Curnow -    9 (3.1%)
43 - White -    9 (3.1%)
17 - Rowe -    8 (2.8%)
44 - Carrazzo -    7 (2.4%)
1 - Walker -    6 (2.1%)
36 - Wood -    6 (2.1%)

Probably not
12 - Boekhorst -    4 (1.4%)
20 - Holman -    4 (1.4%)
21 - Sheehan -    4 (1.4%)
38 - Byrne -    4 (1.4%)
25 - Smith -    2 (0.7%)
11 - Warnock -    1 (0.3%)
18 - Jaksch -    1 (0.3%)
31 - Dick -    1 (0.3%)
34 - Walsh -    1 (0.3%)

Unlikely
5 - Judd -    0 (0%)
10 - Watson -    0 (0%)
14 - Jones -    0 (0%)
16 - Viojo-Rainbow -    0 (0%)
19 - Giles -    0 (0%)
22 - Tutt -    0 (0%)
24 - Whiley -    0 (0%)
26 - Foster -    0 (0%)
29 - Gowers -    0 (0%)
30 - Johnson -    0 (0%)
37 - Fields -    0 (0%)
46 - Ellard -    0 (0%)
47 - Russell -    0 (0%)


Time for a revote courtesy of our new found cellar dweller status.
http://users.tpg.com.au/jrhass/teamboard.swf


Re: Pick your best 22 players - Part 7 (Tanking? - Dead last with 3 to play) - kruddler - 08-25-2015

Lets try and get some more votes in here


Re: Pick your best 22 players - Part 7 (Tanking? - Dead last with 3 to play) - kruddler - 09-27-2015

OK, this last 'best 22' poll for the season.

Once completed i will compile all the results to see what, if any, trends are clear.

Here are the results from the last poll...
STARTERS
3 - Murphy    16 (4.5%)
6 - Simpson    16 (4.5%)
7 - Buckley    16 (4.5%)
8 - Kreuzer    16 (4.5%)
9 - Cripps    16 (4.5%)
15 - Docherty    16 (4.5%)
41 - Casboult    16 (4.5%)
42 - Tuohy    16 (4.5%)
4 - Gibbs    15 (4.3%)
33 - Everitt    15 (4.3%)
1 - Walker    14 (4%)
32 - Graham    14 (4%)
35 - Curnow    14 (4%)
40 - Jamison    14 (4%)

PROBABLES
2 - Menzel    13 (3.7%)
43 - White    13 (3.7%)
39 - Thomas    12 (3.4%)
12 - Boekhorst    11 (3.1%)
17 - Rowe    10 (2.8%)
18 - Jaksch    10 (2.8%)
20 - Holman    10 (2.8%)
28 - Bell    10 (2.8%)

POSSIBLES
27 - Armfield    7 (2%)
13 - Yarran    6 (1.7%)
21 - Sheehan    6 (1.7%)
38 - Byrne    6 (1.7%)
36 - Wood    5 (1.4%)
44 - Carrazzo    5 (1.4%)

PROBABLY NOT
23 - Henderson    4 (1.1%)
24 - Whiley    3 (0.9%)
5 - Judd    2 (0.6%)
19 - Giles    2 (0.6%)
34 - Walsh    2 (0.6%)
25 - Smith    1 (0.3%)

UNLIKELY
10 - Watson    0 (0%)
11 - Warnock    0 (0%)
14 - Jones    0 (0%)
16 - Viojo-Rainbow    0 (0%)
22 - Tutt    0 (0%)
26 - Foster    0 (0%)
29 - Gowers    0 (0%)
30 - Johnson    0 (0%)
31 - Dick    0 (0%)
37 - Fields    0 (0%)
46 - Ellard    0 (0%)
47 - Russell    0 (0%)

http://users.tpg.com.au/jrhass/teamboard.swf


Re: Pick your best 22 players - Part 8 (Season over - wooden spooners) - kruddler - 10-05-2015

Anyone else wanna have a vote in this before i sift through the results?


Re: Pick your best 22 players - Part 8 (Season over - wooden spooners) - DJC - 10-05-2015

It's interesting that Jaksch received so many votes.  It's either wishful thinking, recognition of his apparent potential or acknowledging that we're rubbish  :-\

Hopefully, it is about his potential and I will be able to jump on the bandwaggon next season  Smile


Re: Pick your best 22 players - Part 8 (Season over - wooden spooners) - Lods - 10-06-2015

(10-05-2015, 11:14 PM)DJC link Wrote:It's interesting that Jaksch received so many votes.  It's either wishful thinking, recognition of his apparent potential or acnowledging that we're rubbish  :-\

I think he probably picked up a few votes for his last couple of games of the year.
While nothing spectacular he showed a few glimpses that were an improvement on his early season efforts.


Re: Pick your best 22 players - Part 8 (Season over - wooden spooners) - DJC - 10-06-2015

(10-06-2015, 12:17 AM)Lods link Wrote:I think he probably picked up a few votes for his last couple of games of the year.
While nothing spectacular he showed a few glimpses that were an improvement on his early season efforts.

I missed those games so my perception is probably not as current as other folk.

I thought he showed a bit early on so, if he's improved on that, we may have a player.


Re: Pick your best 22 players - Part 8 (Season over - wooden spooners) - LP - 10-06-2015

(10-06-2015, 03:17 AM)DJC link Wrote:I missed those games so my perception is probably not as current as other folk.

I thought he showed a bit early on so, if he's improved on that, we may have a player.

I worry about Jaksch, I know he is very young but his early performance so far is very Liam Jones like!


Re: Pick your best 22 players - laj - 10-08-2015

(01-08-2015, 11:15 AM)Gointocarlton link Wrote:If Touhy has another shocker at the start of the year, he goes out and Sheehan comes in for mine. Happy to try Jone first up but Watto comes straight in if he fails early. Hard to pick the side which is good, we are starting to get some depth or at the very least, aggressive competition for spots.

Ummm, 3rd in the B & F. Really?