Carlton Supporters Club
CV and mad panic behaviour - Printable Version

+- Carlton Supporters Club (http://new.carltonsc.com)
+-- Forum: Social Club (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-6.html)
+--- Forum: Blah-Blah Bar (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-23.html)
+--- Thread: CV and mad panic behaviour (/thread-4651.html)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743


Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - DJC - 01-26-2022

My daughter's brother in law is a theatre nurse.  He explained that their case load is 50-75% of pre-COVID times but the COVID protocols, furloughs, etc mean that he is working longer and harder than he did pre-COVID. 

On a brighter note, my daughter's family have finished their COVID ISO and came over today for a swim and a game of cricket  Smile


Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - cookie2 - 01-27-2022

(01-25-2022, 11:44 PM)LP link Wrote:Interesting move by Neil Young, telling Spotify either they address Joe Rogan's fake vaccine and COVID news channel or they have to withdraw all his content.

Imagine if Neil Young gets a few more major artists on board, the artists have nothing to fear because they are the majority and all they have to do is stand together!

btw., Joe Rogan was a big peddler of Trump's Regeneron cure, in fact Joe claimed at one stage he used it himself, but it's been withdrawn after being found to be useless against Sars-CoV-2! This type of misinformation is peddled, mostly stuff like HCQ, Ivermectin, Regeneron as a cure by the likes of Trump and Rogan, springs from COVID naysayers confusing a useful treatment for a comorbidity with Sars-CoV-2 treatment. If you get an ancillary infection, a parasite, bacteria or some secondary virus, doctors might find them useful, but against Sars-CoV-2 alone they are useless.

Just reading that it's not Neil Young's call  as to whether or not his music appears on Spotify. Apparently he sold the rights for $150 mill some years ago now! He has subsequently withdrawn his demand it is reported. Who cares? .


Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 01-27-2022

(01-27-2022, 06:18 AM)cookie2 date Wrote:Just reading that it's not Neil Young's call  as to whether or not his music appears on Spotify. Apparently he sold the rights for $150 mill some years ago now! He has subsequently withdrawn his demand it is reported. Who cares? .
I think it is interesting to think artists might take this sort of stand against Spotify or similar social media streaming services, probably many of which are either Google or Meta owned.


Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Mav - 01-27-2022

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis Blasts FDA For Halting Drugs Ineffective On Omicron, HuffPost.

The FDA in the US has pulled the EUAs given to Regeneron & Eli-Lilley for their moniclonal antibody treatments. The Regeneron antibody treatment became famous when it was used to treat Trump when he contracted Covid. The EUAs were pulled as these treatements have no effectiveness against Omicron.

Quote:The FDA announcement was expected, as both drugmakers have said for weeks that the treatments are less able to target omicron because of its mutations. In updated drug labeling released Monday, the FDA said omicron appears 1,000-fold less vulnerable to Regeneron’s drug and nearly 3,000-fold less vulnerable to Lilly’s drug.

Quote:Federal officials said the FDA decision was supported by several independent studies, including a peer-reviewed paper published in the journal Nature last month. In that study, a consortium of European researchers tested the ability of several antibody drugs to neutralize a live sample of the virus, concluding that Lilly and Regeneron’s antibodies “were inactive against omicron.”

The American Medical Association, the nation’s largest physician group, said it agreed with the FDA decision, issuing a statement that read: “Limiting the use of these treatments will help ensure patients receive the best available therapy.”

Bizarrely, Florida Governor Ron De Santis has railed against this decision, blaming Biden for 'medical authoritarianism' even though it was an FDA decision. Biden's spox said it was amazing that De Santis is advocating for patients to be able to use treatments that don't work. Not surprising really: if you're going to campaign against vaccines & masks which work, you need to have some miracle cure to take their place. HCQ & Ivermectin are fake treatments, and now treatments that used to work no longer work.

This exposes how ridiculous the Ivermectin push was. If Covid mutates and renders ineffective some treatments that were effective, how can Ivermectin shills argue that in vitro results using high concentrations of Ivermectin and flawed or fraudulent early studies are relevant now? It's not as though there was any real evidence that Ivermectin was effective against the original Covid strains but there's absolutely no evidence they work against Delta or Omicron. Flyboy used to argue that the way governments and vaccine makers adjusted vaccination programs and the vaccines themselves to maintain the effectiveness of vaccinations was somehow an admission of failure. But when we compare vaccines to treatments such as Regeneron's, we see that adaptability is a strength not a weakness when dealing with a mutating virus.


Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - dodge - 01-27-2022

(01-25-2022, 07:49 AM)shawny link Wrote:https://www.msn.com/en-au/news/australia/dan-andrews-pandemic-response-is-rated-the-worst-in-australia/ar-AAT742A?ocid=entnewsntp

Any other result would be laughable.

Shawny - this still says that 63% reckon he went just OK to very well?  145 of the 403 Victorians surveyed answered in the negative and 254 in the positive the rest were getting splinters.  Wouldn't take this seriously - either way.


Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 01-28-2022

How COVID and it's comorbidities are selectively reported is truly disturbing at times. The truth behind ICU is even scarier than the published death figures as simplistic as they are, they distort perception when you read something like, 30 deaths today, most deaths over 65, etc., etc..

It paints a picture that young people (< 30) are exiting the pandemic unscathed, when the reality is nothing could be further from the truth.

The severe long term effects of COVID are significantly present in the population across the age spectrum, no researcher as yet can definitively report why and science cannot yet predict who is at risk.

It's the statistics that tell us elderly are at more risk of death, counting the dead comes too late, but even then the why is not always clear.

Even foggier is the how and why behind non-lethal severe disease, severe disability or long COVID, and it will probably be that way for years to come!


Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 01-28-2022

(01-27-2022, 12:32 PM)dodge date Wrote:Shawny - this still says that 63% reckon he went just OK to very well?  145 of the 403 Victorians surveyed answered in the negative and 254 in the positive the rest were getting splinters.  Wouldn't take this seriously - either way.
Such a small survey, just way too small to be representative, for example the last unrestricted Vic State Liberal Party conference I'm aware of was held in Ballarat with over 1200 attending, would you run the poll there?

Such a small poll can grossly distort the outcome, as can being selective about where and when you ask the question as well as the question you ask.

I think the small number should make the reader very suspicious of the results.


Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Mav - 01-28-2022

The four factors that could lead to long COVID, The Age.


Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 01-28-2022

(01-28-2022, 02:46 AM)Mav date Wrote:The four factors that could lead to long COVID, The Age.
Yes, I saw this yesterday, but it is far from the full story.

When it comes from the US it's highly likely to be something the Board of a Uni do rather than the research group, the Uni/College will throw out public summaries / papers very early in the process just like this one in the hope they will attract funding / investment.

One of the big problems with Sars-CoV-2 is the a suite of symptoms is so vast, the last summary I saw listed several dozen related symptoms and conditions attributed to Sar-CoV-2 infections. There is pretty much not an organ in your body it can't infect/impact. This has a very real and detrimental effect in trying to characterise COVID as a disease, because virtually everyone on the planet is less than perfect and it seems Sars-CoV-2 loves finding a weakness!

I suppose that broadness is one of the major contributing factors that eventually leads to a lot of debate about what is a COVID case or death.


Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Mav - 01-29-2022

So, now we have son of Omicron, a variant of the variant. Apparently, it's more transmissible than the original.