Carlton Supporters Club
CV and mad panic behaviour - Printable Version

+- Carlton Supporters Club (http://new.carltonsc.com)
+-- Forum: Social Club (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-6.html)
+--- Forum: Blah-Blah Bar (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-23.html)
+--- Thread: CV and mad panic behaviour (/thread-4651.html)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - madbluboy - 01-11-2022

(01-10-2022, 11:41 PM)LP link Wrote:The latest science indicates vaccinated are approximately 8x less likely to suffer long term effects from all COVID variants, this is over and above the already greatly reduced risk of getting a SARS-CoV-2 infection in the first place. Vaccination reduces the risk of infection for all SARS-CoV-2 variants.

Breakthrough infections occur at approximately 1/10th the rate of infections in unvaccinated, similar benefits are shown in hospital admissions and acute/intensive care.

Sufferers of SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections also appear to be 4x less likely to experience severe long term symptoms.

Preliminary findings also indicate are that any unvaccinated sufferers of long COVID will experience reduced severity of symptoms if they proceed to be vaccinated once eligible.

Vaccination, win, win, win and win! ;D

That's all that you need to know about getting vaccinated.

The additional lies about only the unvaccinated spreading it hasn't aged well at all. Not expecting any apologies though.

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Mav - 01-11-2022

(01-11-2022, 12:57 AM)madbluboy link Wrote:He didn't win because he's rich, he was able fight because he's rich.

He won because he didn't do anything wrong.
He won because the Fed Govt stuffed up. If it had wanted to keep unvaccinated anti-vaxxers out, it should have been like shooting fish in a barrel. But the Govt put a lid on the barrel and put it inside a bank vault, making the job of shooting the fish so much harder.

The article LP referenced talked about whether he should have been able to make bad faith use of a medical exemption under the Victorian system. If the Fed Govt had wanted to enforce a tougher approach by rejecting those who obtained the medical exemption on the ground of prior infection, it could have done so easily. Making that clear on the material it published and having Immigration Officials weeding out such applications for visas before granting them would have been a good start.

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 01-11-2022

(01-11-2022, 12:59 AM)madbluboy date Wrote:That's all that you need to know about getting vaccinated.

The additional lies about only the unvaccinated spreading it hasn't aged well at all. Not expecting any apologies though.
Not sure what you assert, if you are more likely to get it, and you are more likely to get it when you are unvaccinated, then you are more likely to spread it, it's pretty basic.

Vaccinated people have reduced chance of getting it, if they do get it a breakthrough infection it will most likely be less severe, and once they have got it they are less likely to spread it.

Vaccinated people who get a breakthrough infection are likely to have the infection for a much shorter period of time, if they become infectious they are likely to stay infectious for a shorter period of time, they will also most likely have less long term side effects.

Getting an infection and being infectious are two different things, which are often not distinguished by much of the media coverage.

Nobody credible ever said vaccines deliver 100% efficacy, that is just a rock that the vaccine naysayers like to throw around!

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Mav - 01-11-2022

(01-11-2022, 12:59 AM)madbluboy link Wrote:The additional lies about only the unvaccinated spreading it hasn't aged well at all. Not expecting any apologies though.
Was that ever stated as a black and white proposition? Or was it the more muted version that the unvaccinated were more likely to spread it than the vaccinated? If the latter, that was most likely true and it may well be true also of Omicron.

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - madbluboy - 01-11-2022

(01-11-2022, 01:12 AM)LP link Wrote:Not sure what you assert, if you are more likely to get it, and you are more likely to get it when you are unvaccinated, then you are more likely to spread it, it's pretty basic.

Vaccinated people have reduced chance of getting it, if they do get it a breakthrough infection it will most likely be less severe, and once they have got it they are less likely to spread it.

Vaccinated people who get a breakthrough infection are likely to have the infection for a much shorter period of time, if they become infectious they are likely to stay infectious for a shorter period of time, they will also have less long term side effects.

Nobody credible ever said vaccines deliver 100% efficacy, that is just a rock that the vaccine naysayers like to throw!

Lies.
Covid has ripped through my workplace. Everyone is wearing masks, socially distanced and vaccinated.

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 01-11-2022

(01-11-2022, 01:14 AM)madbluboy date Wrote:Lies.
Covid has ripped through my workplace. Everyone is wearing masks, socially distanced and vaccinated.
It only takes one person, it may not have been an employee even, and the probability is that it's someone who either gained no benefit from being vaccinated or was effectively unvaccinated. Someone who has experienced diminished efficacy.

It's not an "either or" / "yes or no" scenario, it's about chance, risk and probability.

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - madbluboy - 01-11-2022

(01-11-2022, 01:10 AM)Mav link Wrote:He won because the Fed Govt stuffed up. If it had wanted to keep unvaccinated anti-vaxxers out, it should have been like shooting fish in a barrel. But the Govt put a lid on the barrel and put it inside a bank vault, making the job of shooting the fish so much harder.

The article LP referenced talked about whether he should have been able to make bad faith use of a medical exemption under the Victorian system. If the Fed Govt had wanted to enforce a tougher approach by rejecting those who obtained the medical exemption on the ground of prior infection, it could have done so easily. Making that clear on the material it published and having Immigration Officials weeding out such applications for visas before granting them would have been a good start.

I agree with all of that.

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 01-11-2022

(01-11-2022, 12:57 AM)madbluboy date Wrote:He didn't win because he's rich, he was able fight because he's rich.
He won because he is elite rich, a family of vast individual and combined wealth that enable Djokers contrary behaviour.

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - madbluboy - 01-11-2022

(01-11-2022, 01:25 AM)LP link Wrote:He won because he is elite rich, a family of vast individual and combined wealth that enable Djokers contrary behaviour.

He won because he had a medical exemption despite scomo saying he didn't.



Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Mav - 01-11-2022

Is it politically wise for the Immigration Minister, Alex Hawke, to emphasise that he has the power to cancel Djokovic's Visa in his discretion? The only advantage to the Govt would be that it might send a message to Djokovic and his family that it's best not to gloat to the media about winning the court case.

By raising the issue, however, it makes it clear Djokovic's continued presence in Australia is due to a Govt decision, not a court decision. Unless Hawke follows through and cancels the Visa, Scotty from Marketing completely loses any advantage he might have had in running a Tampa redux campaign.  He could still try to run the 'We will decide who comes to this country' line, but if Alex Hawke doesn't act then that would probably be met with scorn. If the Visa is cancelled, it will probably just focus attention on how inept the handling of this saga has been. Either way, the opposition will have a field day.