![]() |
|
CV and mad panic behaviour - Printable Version +- Carlton Supporters Club (http://new.carltonsc.com) +-- Forum: Social Club (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-6.html) +--- Forum: Blah-Blah Bar (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-23.html) +--- Thread: CV and mad panic behaviour (/thread-4651.html) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
|
Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - ElwoodBlues1 - 01-07-2022 (01-07-2022, 12:24 AM)capcom link Wrote:I agree ... we jumped too early. The case numbers are staggering and I certainly have no faith in the accuracy of the reported numbers any longer from many many countries.Thanks mate.. Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 01-07-2022 (01-06-2022, 11:29 PM)madbluboy date Wrote:https://www.theage.com.au/national/nsw/talented-powerlifter-and-scientist-identified-as-young-man-who-died-with-covid-20220107-p59mht.htmlPeople in general are not taking this Omicron variant seriously, they are assessing risk under the old fake media parameters in which Sars-CoV-2 was alleged not to be very serious for kids. That was never true and Omicron is different/worse for kids and youth, maybe it's milder for adults in the long term, the scientists have been telling us this for weeks and weeks and nobody in the mainstream media is listening. The media is full of and run by adults and old people, taking a very selfish perspective and basically throwing kids and youth to the wolves! All the premises about COVID being mild and not serious for kids are bullcrap, and completely ignore the potential long term non-lethal effects of getting Sars-CoV-2 infection. The foolish "COVID doesn't affect kids" perspective is built on the false premise that "If it's non-lethal it's OK!" Despite being not as frequent the potential serious side-effects of COVID for youth and children are every bit as acute as Chicken Pox, Mumps, Measles or Rubella! Don't listening to Facebook, Tik Tok or Instagram, they don't care about your kids, they only care about clicks! Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Macca37 - 01-07-2022 Just to let everyone know there is a nasty, non-covid virus out in the community at the moment. My wife and I had our booster shots on 20 December. On 28 December we became ill, showing all of the covid symptoms except for not having a temperature. The results of two RAT tests for each of us were negative, but we are still too ill to leave home. Our daughter has told us that a friend of hers in her forties, double vaccinated, has been ill with the same symptoms since Christmas Day and has also tested negative. Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 01-07-2022 (01-07-2022, 02:12 AM)Macca37 date Wrote:Just to let everyone know there is a nasty, non-covid virus out in the community at the moment.Yep, [member=40]Macca37[/member] I can confirm this, I have contacts suffering the very same, nasty cough, sore throat, congestion, loss of appetite, multiple negative COVID tests. Our local Chemist was the first to alert us to it, but they don't want to make a big deal about it because they still want people to make sure they get COVID tested if the have such symptoms. I don't need to remind people the health authorities have been warning of this, nature deplores a vacuum and the pandemic has left a gaping hole for a new flu or some other virus to slot into! Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - kruddler - 01-07-2022 (01-07-2022, 02:51 AM)LP link Wrote:Yep, [member=40]Macca37[/member] I can confirm this, I have contacts suffering the very same, nasty cough, sore throat, congestion, loss of appetite, multiple negative COVID tests. Our local Chemist was the first to alert us to it, but they don't want to make a big deal about it because they still want people to make sure they get COVID tested.Not sure how accurate it is but i've heard reports that omicron is better detected via a saliva swab and the up the nose ones are coming back negative, even if the patient has it. Could explain a few things with people being sick, but negative. Not sure how accurate any of that is though. Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 01-07-2022 (01-07-2022, 02:54 AM)kruddler date Wrote:Not sure how accurate it is but i've heard reports that omicron is better detected via a saliva swab and the up the nose ones are coming back negative, even if the patient has it.The tests I've seen people using require you to swab both the nasal cavity and the back of the throat. The drive through tests have always been like that. Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Thryleon - 01-07-2022 (01-06-2022, 11:04 PM)kruddler link Wrote:Similar could've been said about a former world number 1 who came back from cancer to reclaim his title. I don't idolise people very flippantly. In fact, my idolatry of sports stars wanes the more money involved in becoming the greatest there is. It becomes a self fulfilling prophecy. Very difficult to become the world number 1, but when you get there, the dollars for simply being there can sustain you at the top (ala Hawks, and recruiting players cheaply during their recent reign). Nobody should have lost their livelihood over these choices, and this recent Novak flip flop makes the government look like the rabble they are. Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - madbluboy - 01-07-2022 (01-07-2022, 02:54 AM)kruddler link Wrote:Not sure how accurate it is but i've heard reports that omicron is better detected via a saliva swab and the up the nose ones are coming back negative, even if the patient has it. I know someone who did a rapid test and a PCR within an hour of each other and the rapid was negative but the PCR came back positive. Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Mav - 01-07-2022 Macca, the flu is going to rebound now the lockdowns have ended. Despite the anti-vaxxers arguing that Covid is no worse than the flu and behaving as if the flu is no worse than a paper cut, the reality is that flu can be a serious disease. Unfortunately, there's also the Flurona which is where someone catches both the flu and covid. Best wishes on a swift recovery for your wife and yourself. Interesting comments from Abul Rivzi, a former Deputy Secretary of the Department of Immigration: Why stopping Djokovic at airport was worst outcome for all,, 9News. He notes that the Govt blew 2 opportunities to stop Djokovic before he arrived in Australia: 1. They should have refused the visa instead of granting it, & 2. Australian Border Force staff would have been supervising the boarding of the flight in Dubai (?) and should have pulled Djokovic out of the queue or off the plane. Quote:Mr Rizvi said intercepting and turning people around at the border "should only be done in absolute emergencies or when there has been dramatic changes in circumstances or some other alarming thing has happened." Djokovic might then be able to rely on an administrative law principle: he had a legitimate expectation that he would be admitted to Australia and undertook a lengthy flight in reliance on that expectation. Mr Rivzi hit the nail on the head when he pretty much described Scotty from Marketing's MO in dealing with fiascos: Quote:If Djokovic wins his appeal, the Government could appeal that ruling. Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - capcom - 01-07-2022 (01-07-2022, 04:04 AM)Mav link Wrote:Australian Border Force staff would have been supervising the boarding of the flight in Dubai (?) and should have pulled Djokovic out of the queue or off the plane. THAT would be an international airport first. Don't believe it for a second |