+- Carlton Supporters Club (http://new.carltonsc.com)
+-- Forum: Princes Park (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: Robert Heatley Stand (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-14.html)
+--- Thread: Rd 19: Post Game Conversations: Carlton vs Geelong (/thread-3396.html)
Re: Rd 19: Post Game Conversations: Carlton vs Geelong - Gointocarlton - 07-30-2017
(07-29-2017, 11:33 PM)JonHenry link Wrote:Bambi?Mate not calling him Bambi because he is soft, its because he is protected and loved species.
Our side is full of Bambi's.
We are in NO position to call anyone else soft.
Great day to hang our head in shame
PS Dangerfield is the best player in the comp by a fair way. Does it all better than most, the complete complete package who wins games off his own boot and is at the peak of his powers.
Re: Rd 19: Post Game Conversations: Carlton vs Geelong - JonHenry - 07-30-2017
(07-30-2017, 12:15 AM)Gointocarlton link Wrote:Mate not calling him Bambi because he is soft, its because he is protected and loved species.
PS Dangerfield is the best player in the comp by a fair way. Does it all better than most, the complete complete package who wins games off his own boot and is at the peak of his powers.
Ok I get it now but I think we all need to understand where we are at.
Stop making excuses for our senior players, because "they have to carry a heavy load" or they are not "inside" mids.
Leaders are supposed to overcome, not fold when the heat is on.
If our leaders give up, what does that say to the kids.
This is exactly the same stuff Murphy and Gibbs learnt from their leaders when they first joined Carlton.
By the time Jude arrived, it was too late.
Nick Stevens had set the "standard"
Re: Rd 19: Post Game Conversations: Carlton vs Geelong - Milhanna13 - 07-30-2017
(07-29-2017, 12:08 PM)LoveNavy link Wrote:I hope big Kruez is OK.
What a mongrel act by the untouchable Danger >
No free kick? In fact, they got a goal from it!!
Re: Rd 19: Post Game Conversations: Carlton vs Geelong - Milhanna13 - 07-30-2017
(07-29-2017, 10:49 PM)Gointocarlton link Wrote:BS, as soon and Kruze made contact, he dropped his knees and threw himself backwards, arms outstretched (like his kent of a coach does in the box), whistle, free, goal!!!
Just watching the replay and I can see a bit of the Scott arms out stretched whinging action creeping into Danger's game. As soon as he is touched he looks to the umpire - even during play!! No commentator will ever call him on it though!!
Re: Rd 19: Post Game Conversations: Carlton vs Geelong - Rational_Expectations - 07-30-2017
McKay only the four possessions, but we have ourselves a player. Of that I'm sure.
Re: Rd 19: Post Game Conversations: Carlton vs Geelong - ElwoodBlues1 - 07-30-2017
(07-30-2017, 01:25 AM)Rational_Expectations link Wrote:McKay only the four possessions, but we have ourselves a player. Of that I'm sure.
Agree...got good skills for a big bloke and footy nous.....
Re: Rd 19: Post Game Conversations: Carlton vs Geelong - PaulP - 07-30-2017
http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/patrick-dangerfield-says-his-tackle-of-matthew-kreuzer-was-fair-20170730-gxlkqu.html
See, he's innocent.
Re: Rd 19: Post Game Conversations: Carlton vs Geelong - LP - 07-30-2017
(07-30-2017, 01:55 AM)PaulP link Wrote:http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/patrick-dangerfield-says-his-tackle-of-matthew-kreuzer-was-fair-20170730-gxlkqu.html
See, he's innocent.
Of course he is, and the media won't reference a single contradictory precedent to challenge his claims!
Re: Rd 19: Post Game Conversations: Carlton vs Geelong - Baggers - 07-30-2017
(07-30-2017, 01:55 AM)PaulP link Wrote:http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/patrick-dangerfield-says-his-tackle-of-matthew-kreuzer-was-fair-20170730-gxlkqu.html
See, he's innocent.
The pinning of arms and driving his head into the turf is 'fair?' Does the arrogance of this Dangerfield character know no bounds?
But, alas, Cotchin and Dangerfield are two AFL designated players to be cut more slack than anyone else.
Re: Rd 19: Post Game Conversations: Carlton vs Geelong - PaulP - 07-30-2017
(07-30-2017, 02:00 AM)LP link Wrote:Of course he is, and the media won't reference a single contradictory precedent to challenge his claims!
I wish the AFL would impose legal style gag order on these types of incidents - attempting to influence the outcome by commenting publicly is complete BS IMO.