+- Carlton Supporters Club (http://new.carltonsc.com)
+-- Forum: Princes Park (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: Robert Heatley Stand (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-14.html)
+--- Thread: Rd 15: Pre Game Prognostications: Carlton vs Collingwood (/thread-2814.html)
Re: Rd 15: Pre Game Prognostications: Carlton vs Collingwood - LP - 06-29-2016
(06-29-2016, 06:40 AM)DJC link Wrote:However, giving under-performing players a shot before him on the basis of their youth would be sending a very, very, very bad message.
I don't believe under-performing is the same as inconsistency, I accept the younger players have consistency problems, but when they play well they play well and labeling them under-performing is a bit unfair.
Tutt has been gathering 30+ possession games for most of the season, that gets him some attention, but the defects in his game are the very same defects he had at the Bulldogs before he came to Carlton. Nothing has changed! At AFL level where he has no significant advantage the opposition expose his foibles within minutes. If there were no short steps from Tutt in those VFL games you have watched, he sure made up for it in his last AFL match!
Re: Rd 15: Pre Game Prognostications: Carlton vs Collingwood - cimm1979 - 06-29-2016
(06-29-2016, 06:40 AM)DJC link Wrote:I don't think that Tutt has the ability to succeed at AFL level but he has been outstanding in the VFL. He must appreciate the little bit of extra time because there are no short steps and his decision making and execution have been good.
As one of the most consistent and and better performing players in the NBs, Tutt deserved an opportunity in the seniors. That he didn't make the most of it is another issue. However, giving under-performing players a shot before him on the basis of their youth would be sending a very, very, very bad message.
THIS!
The club have been very good with selections this year. They support the team vision and the logic can't be faulted.
But of course the methodology doesn't guarantee wins, otherwise we'd have #17 in the bag.
Re: Rd 15: Pre Game Prognostications: Carlton vs Collingwood - bratblue - 06-29-2016
(06-29-2016, 07:01 AM)cimm1979 link Wrote:THIS!
But of course the methodology doesn't guarantee wins, otherwise we'd have #17 in the bag.
Another negative nelly..
Re: Rd 15: Pre Game Prognostications: Carlton vs Collingwood - DJC - 06-29-2016
(06-29-2016, 07:01 AM)cimm1979 link Wrote:THIS!
The club have been very good with selections this year. They support the team vision and the logic can't be faulted.
But of course the methodology doesn't guarantee wins, otherwise we'd have #17 in the bag.
It's all part of "driving culture and values" as Bolton would say.
Re: Rd 15: Pre Game Prognostications: Carlton vs Collingwood - Meddy43 - 06-29-2016
Any chance of Murph being back?
Also game number 200 for 1AW !!
Re: Rd 15: Pre Game Prognostications: Carlton vs Collingwood - Gointocarlton - 06-29-2016
(06-29-2016, 09:54 AM)Meddy43 link Wrote:Any chance of Murph being back?Injury Update on the website says still 3 weeks away.
Also game number 200 for 1AW !!
Re: Rd 15: Pre Game Prognostications: Carlton vs Collingwood - townsendcalling - 06-29-2016
Murphy 'At least 3 weeks away'. At what stage do we call 'SEASON'?
Re: Rd 15: Pre Game Prognostications: Carlton vs Collingwood - crashlander - 06-29-2016
(06-29-2016, 10:02 AM)townsendcalling link Wrote:Murphy 'At least 3 weeks away'. At what stage do we call 'SEASON'?Probably not that far away, which is a pity. We certainly miss him. Our midfield is not the same without him.
Re: Rd 15: Pre Game Prognostications: Carlton vs Collingwood - cookie2 - 06-29-2016
(06-29-2016, 10:50 AM)crashlander link Wrote:Probably not that far away, which is a pity. We certainly miss him. Our midfield is not the same without him.
Agree 100%.
Re: Rd 15: Pre Game Prognostications: Carlton vs Collingwood - mina1 - 06-30-2016
this is why we have to keep our draft picks and recruit mids (quick)in this year draft.