![]() |
|
For Discussion - Printable Version +- Carlton Supporters Club (http://new.carltonsc.com) +-- Forum: Princes Park (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-4.html) +--- Forum: Robert Heatley Stand (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-14.html) +--- Thread: For Discussion (/thread-2487.html) |
Re: For Discussion - Robblues - 12-16-2015 (12-16-2015, 08:33 PM)Lods link Wrote:A lot depends on how we structure.I tend to agree with Lods , Everitt as FF would be a good reliable shot at goal, can take a grab. We do need a go to person , some one who we can have confidence in to convert. The amount of times in the last few years where we have taken huge efforts to finally get a shot at goal, only to see it squandered is disheartening & has has effect on on field performance. Re: For Discussion - ElwoodBlues1 - 12-16-2015 Agree there is nothing special about Dickson except none of our blokes can kick as straight...50 goals 12 behinds for the season......thats about as efficient as it gets....... Re: For Discussion - Baggers - 12-16-2015 Probably important to remember that a number of our boys who are young but have been around for a few years haven't been coached properly, or given a game plan that just plain didn't suit them (or the team, for that matter... yes, that'd be you, MM). If the Dishlickers taught us anything it's that a 'good ordinary' list properly coached is capable of anything. Re: For Discussion - DJC - 12-16-2015 Matt Murnane and a few of our players must have read some of the comments posted in this thread ![]() Quote:So much recently has been spoken about the youth that has now flooded the Blues' list and there is a genuine acknowledgement throughout the club and supporters that a "reset" is needed. Re: For Discussion - cookie2 - 12-17-2015 (12-16-2015, 11:20 PM)DJC link Wrote:Matt Murnane and a few of our players must have read some of the comments posted in this thread I often think that DJC. Many of the issues raised here (initially as far as I can tell) end up in the media, sometimes nearly word for word with the same examples etc etc. "You read it her first!" could certainly be claimed by CSC a lot of the time.
Re: For Discussion - laj - 12-17-2015 (12-16-2015, 09:49 AM)townsendcalling link Wrote:Re Walker: I was all ready to concede that pinning any hope on him up forward would be unrealistic. However in his last 4 games last year up forward, where we got smashed in 3, he averaged 2.5 goals per game. Walker been unfortunate to have been played out of position most of his career. We have three potential 40ish goal forwards in Everitt, Walker and Casboult. That's a good start in anyone's language. If we get a good game plan going and players buy right in and execute that type of forward line will be very handy. We'd get plenty of the midfielder kicking goals too. Re: For Discussion - flyboy77 - 12-17-2015 (12-17-2015, 03:12 AM)laj link Wrote:Walker been unfortunate to have been played out of position most of his career. Kerridge clearly is capable of kicking bags as a mid/HFF - surely he fits in the 40+ category too..... Re: For Discussion - ElwoodBlues1 - 12-17-2015 (12-17-2015, 03:36 AM)flyboy77 link Wrote:Kerridge clearly is capable of kicking bags as a mid/HFF - surely he fits in the 40+ category too..... Lamb and Wright can kick a few too ... Re: For Discussion - Raydan - 12-17-2015 Seriously? I like that we've got Kerridge, but just remember he couldn't get a game at Adelaide. If he could kick 40, I'm sure they would have squeezed him in somewhere. Re: For Discussion - PassIt2Carrots - 12-17-2015 I saw another poster mention Kerridge as an option for captain! ;D |