+- Carlton Supporters Club (http://new.carltonsc.com)
+-- Forum: Social Club (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-6.html)
+--- Forum: Blah-Blah Bar (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-23.html)
+--- Thread: CV and mad panic behaviour (/thread-4651.html)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - madbluboy - 10-05-2021
(10-05-2021, 12:14 PM)DJC link Wrote:I have to ask, where did your 99% figure come from? I don't think it's based on any of the scientific modelling.
There's more chance of getting COVID by getting together with folk in someone's home. The chances of getting COVID by shopping in a supermarket while wearing a mask and social distancing are pretty low but checking in with the QR code means that you'll be tracked if you're exposed.
The chances of getting COVID by taking part in protest/riot and not wearing a mask and/or social distancing may not be high but, because no-one knows who was there and the participants are unlikely to be tested, we won't know whether it was a super-spreader event until folk are in ICU or are found dead at home.
Considering there are hundreds (not an assumption, Brett Sutton's words) of exposure sites including homes and workplaces that are not publicly listed yes the protests are less than 1%.
Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 10-05-2021
(10-05-2021, 08:33 PM)madbluboy date Wrote:Considering there are hundreds (not an assumption, Brett Sutton's words) of exposure sites including homes and workplaces that are not publicly listed yes the protests are less than 1%.Not all exposures are equal.
Although any incidents can cause a transmission, walking past someone at arms length in a sparsely populated supermarket is not the same as standing shoulder to shoulder packed in together screaming at the police for 2 hrs. That's pretty obvious!
Of course what happens next is important too, if you get in a car alone and go straight home and isolate, or if you hop on a tram or train ignoring social distancing and mask rules.
All incidents are reported as an exposure site, but it's obvious all are not equal!
Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - madbluboy - 10-05-2021
The funniest part is I have been accused by the lefties on here of questioning scientific minds and their modelling (which I didn't) but only one poster on here puts up their own modelling and they never question him.
Oh wait is LP the scientific mind I shouldn't be questioning?
Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 10-05-2021
(10-05-2021, 09:00 PM)madbluboy date Wrote:The funniest part is I have been accused by the lefties on here of questioning scientific minds and their modelling (which I didn't) but only one poster on here puts up their own modelling and they never question him.I'm not sure you need science to tell the difference between those events, can I ask why you specifically believe all exposure sites are equal?
Oh wait is LP the scientific mind I shouldn't be questioning?
Have we had a supermarket based super spreader event yet?
Most commercial retail have had density caps and new ventilation guidelines they have to follow, and have been doing so for more than a year now, so do schools now. The two main events from schools that have caused super-spreading are because they largely ignored social distancing guidelines and packed too many students and staff into confined poorly ventilated spaces for an event.
Of course limiting the spread all only works if everyone obey the basic rules, ........... Doh!
Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - madbluboy - 10-05-2021
(10-05-2021, 09:06 PM)LP link Wrote:I'm not sure you need science to tell the difference between those events, can I ask why you specifically believe all exposure sites are equal?
No. Indoors is worse than outdoors.
That's why we are allowed to catch up in parks but not homes. Unless you are holding up an anti Dan sign then it's dangerous.
Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 10-05-2021
(10-05-2021, 09:09 PM)madbluboy date Wrote:No. Indoors is worse than outdoors.While obeying social distancing rules and still wearing your mask, it's pretty obvious.
That's why we are allowed to catch up in parks but not homes. Unless you are holding up an anti Dan sign then it's dangerous.
They were mostly protesting Setka weren't they, at least I think that is what the non-Murdoch news showed me?
They are free to protest and conduct themselves as they like, they don't get shot for protesting like in China. I suppose it's why we don't randomly walk through parks attacking young picnicking families who are wearing their masks while getting the kids some outdoor time, we don't want to be hypocrites!
Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - madbluboy - 10-05-2021
Tarring every protester with that brush is like saying every cop is like that coward who walked up behind that guy and slam tackled his head into the ground.
Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - kruddler - 10-05-2021
(10-05-2021, 09:31 PM)madbluboy link Wrote:Tarring every protester with that brush is like saying every cop is like that coward who walked up behind that guy and slam tackled his head into the ground.
Was that one of the guys who put a cop in the hospital first?
Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - madbluboy - 10-05-2021
(10-05-2021, 09:39 PM)kruddler link Wrote:Was that one of the guys who put a cop in the hospital first?
No and he didn't have a knife either that Dan's Facebook army tried to pretend.
The cop was suspended. If you or I did it we would be serving prison time.
Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Mav - 10-05-2021
Quote:Young men who were at the rally on Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday are now being picked up in rapid tests as they are taken to hospital, the Herald Sun reports.https://www.news.com.au/world/coronavirus/australia/australia-covid-news-live-lockdown-restrictions-cases-and-vaccinations/news-story/379c7b11ac05da50fcfd8c5dfc3c9090
That qualifies as an admission against interest by Murdoch.