![]() |
|
CV and mad panic behaviour - Printable Version +- Carlton Supporters Club (http://new.carltonsc.com) +-- Forum: Social Club (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-6.html) +--- Forum: Blah-Blah Bar (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-23.html) +--- Thread: CV and mad panic behaviour (/thread-4651.html) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
|
Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Mav - 10-02-2021 I noted a while back that pharmaceutical companies were racing to produce oral antiviral medication for Covid, but it appears Merck is just about to win the race: How Merck's antiviral pill could change the game for Covid-19, National Geographic. Merck pill could cut COVID risk in half but won't be a 'miracle' cure for coronavirus, scientists say, abc.net.au. Merck's trial was stopped early because it was so successful (ethical rules say you can't continue a trial with a group unprotected by placebos when it's clear a drug is effective). There were 8 deaths in the placebo group and none in the medicated group. in the placebo group, 14.1% were hospitalised within the 29 days of the study while the medicatation halved that rate in those taking the medication. Considering that those in both groups were high risk and were all shown by testing to be be Covid-positive (including with Delta and Mu variants) before the trial began, that's not bad. Merck is now applying for emergency use authorisations in the US and around the world. The benefit of this drug is that it comes in a course of tablets: 4 pills twice a day for 4 days. There is currently no oral antiviral medication for Covid. Patients can be treated at home and that would free up beds in hospitals.. On the other hand, monoclonal antibodies, whilst effective, are administered intravenously and that obviously needs to be done by medical staff. Of course, it'll earn Merck a pretty packet. The US Govt has already bought courses at US$700 a pop. But the Federal Govt would no doubt put it on the PBS scheme which would reduce its cost to patients and providing it free would be cost-effective when you look at the cost of hospitalising someone for a month or so. Presumably, it might only be available to those who were enrolled in the trial, in other words those who have at least 1 risk factor including being over 60, obese, immunocompromised from other conditions or having underlying heart or pulmonary disease, among others. But I can just imagine the flipside of the argument that the over-60s made that they shouldn't be shut out of Pfizer just because they're over 60: 59 year olds will argue there's no basis for shutting them out if someone just a year older is eligible. Apparently, monoclonal antibodies are more effective still (85% effective in reducing hospitalisation and death) but cost 3 times more. Does Medicare provide these currently? Can the oral medications be a first line of defence and then monoclonal antibodies might be provided if they fail? In any event, it would be great if this drug is available to treat patients before the hospitals are overrun. Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Lods - 10-02-2021 (10-01-2021, 02:00 AM)madbluboy link Wrote:No jab No work. All sectors. I'd expect the majority of AFL players won't have an issue with this. I'm just curious though....the AFL would have to make it a mandatory requirement as well. Otherwise we have the situation where Victorian based players are impacted, yet it's not necessarily a requirement for interstate players. I haven't seen anything, but has the AFL already moved towards vaccination being compulsory. Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 10-02-2021 (10-02-2021, 02:29 AM)Mav date Wrote:Of course, it'll earn Merck a pretty packet. The US Govt has already bought courses at US$700 a pop. But the Federal Govt would no doubt put it on the PBS scheme which would reduce its cost to patients and providing it free would be cost-effective when you look at the cost of hospitalising someone for a month or so.The government should make it free, it's an order of magnitude cheaper than a hospital visit, if they make it too expensive or even moderately expensive there will be very vulnerable people who delay and then need to be hospitalised destroying the benefit and the savings. Like the intravenous treatments, it's most effective administered early, so ideally you do not want people waiting until they are sick. If someone is positive have it ready to administer. There is talk of allowing doctors clinics to administer the intravenous treatments or even have RNs doing it in homes. Merck might have won the race to be first, but GSK and others won't stop, the prize is too high, and the variants will keep coming. I've also read recently an auto-injector version being tested, works like diabetic or Epi pens, should be easy to use. This is very exciting, we need this to work and quickly. Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 10-02-2021 A brother of a friend, 65yo still fit lean healthy tradie working in and around Melbourne. Had previously had one AZ vaccine shot a couple of weeks before getting the sniffles, thought they were a vaccine side-effect, but got worse after a couple of days so got tested, .......... positive! Isolated at home, said he had no major problems, felt a bit unwell like having the lurgy, was talking to friends and family on the phone who suggested he should go back to his doctor as he sounded unwell. Promised them he'd get a nights rest and go tomorrow. Tomorrow never come around! Barely a week after testing positive and he was gone! No blood clots, no stroke, no cancer, no underlying major disease found by the coroner, as he was found passed at home by his son it had to be fully investigated, just COVID, nothing more and nothing less. You do not have to be unwell or have some other illness. You do not need to have some co-morbidity. You do not need to be overweight. You do not need to be frail. All you have to do is get it! Don't feck around, get vaccinated, if your ill get help, don't take the risk, and don't delay! The only thing you know is that you don't know, so do as the ads say, if you have a cough or runny nose, fever, sore throat, whatever cold or flu like symptoms no matter how mild, get tested, it's free, it's fast, and it could save your life! Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Mav - 10-03-2021 Wise words LP and condolences to your friend. Unfortunately, your friend’s brother did have 1 factor that put him in a susceptible category: his age. We don’t think of our immune systems deteriorating with age as we we can’t measure it or assess it ourselves, unlike our hair, skin and sporting performance. But a fully-vaccinated 80 year old only has the resistance to Covid of an unvaccinated 50 year old (and nowhere near the resistance of a fully vaccinated 50 year old). I don’t know what the comparison would be for a fully vaccinated 65 year old, but the vaccine will only partially reverse the ravages of time. Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Lods - 10-03-2021 (10-03-2021, 12:33 AM)Mav link Wrote:Wise words LP and condolences to your friend. I'm 67. Double vaccinated but with kidney and heart issues. I've just recovered from a respiratory illness which included a severe cough that lasted two months. I had 4 tests over that time just to keep making sure what I was experiencing wasn't Covid, but if Covid is worse than that (and I'm sure it is) I don't think being double vaccinated will make a huge difference. But I'm quite happy to do it for others. Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 10-03-2021 (10-03-2021, 02:07 AM)Lods date Wrote:I'm 67.It's also a factor of age that the efficacy of the vaccines diminish quicker, so once/if they start offering boosters you should not hesitate to check with your doctor and get it if you are eligible. Glad to hear your vigilant, my mates brother made the primary error of disregarding the initial sniffles and it cost him his life! I suppose part of the problem is people do not want to believe they might have it, when the reality is more than likely we'll all get it at some stage, and the earlier you are diagnosed and treated the better. Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Mav - 10-03-2021 Yep, we have to operate on the assumption that every one of us will at least be exposed to Covid at some point. The trick is to put it off as long as possible so effective treatments are available when the bell tolls for us. Double vaccination may well be enough to help you survive even if there’s no guarantee, but if it slows down Covid’s progression so that you have time to take these new oral antivirals then it will have done its job. Imagine being in that first wave of cases when the doctors had no idea how to treat Covid patients ... Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - madbluboy - 10-03-2021 Apparently international cricketers and tennis players are except from the no jab no work mandate. Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Mav - 10-03-2021 Novak has caught Covid so many times he must be immune by now ... |