+- Carlton Supporters Club (http://new.carltonsc.com)
+-- Forum: Princes Park (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: Robert Heatley Stand (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-14.html)
+--- Thread: 2017 Round 6: Post game Awesomeness (/thread-3247.html)
Re: 2017 Round 6: Post game Awesomeness - ElwoodBlues1 - 04-29-2017
(04-29-2017, 07:59 AM)LP link Wrote:Maybe warming him up on the wing is SpecialK's thing!
Could be more about warming up the Boult before sending him forward....
Re: 2017 Round 6: Post game Awesomeness - kruddler - 04-29-2017
(04-29-2017, 07:57 AM)JonHenry link Wrote:Herald sun has no report of the game, just the Rohan incident.
They have already been hauled over the coals for biased reporting this year.
So glad they hate us winning so much
To be fair, it IS a bigger story.
The report will come, if its not there already.
Rohan nearly killed himself. Had it been against anyone else on our list, he probably would've killed them! Hero? Hardly.
Re: 2017 Round 6: Post game Awesomeness - LP - 04-29-2017
(04-29-2017, 09:11 AM)kruddler link Wrote:To be fair, it IS a bigger story.
The report will come, if its not there already.
Rohan nearly killed himself. Had it been against anyone else on our list, he probably would've killed them! Hero? Hardly.
How can it be Rowe doesn't get a free, it seems bizarre!
Re: 2017 Round 6: Post game Awesomeness - PaulP - 04-29-2017
(04-29-2017, 09:27 AM)LP link Wrote:How can it be Rowe doesn't get a free, it seems bizarre!
My understanding is that the minute a player takes his eye off the ball and looks at the player, it's pretty much an automatic free. I was also wondering why Rowe wasn't paid.
Re: 2017 Round 6: Post game Awesomeness - shawny - 04-29-2017
(04-29-2017, 09:31 AM)PaulP link Wrote:My understanding is that the minute a player takes his eye off the ball and looks at the player, it's pretty much an automatic free. I was also wondering why Rowe wasn't paid.
True - and add the push grundy did on SOJ in the goal square im the first quarter.
No free there.
Then 45 secs later kruezer rag dolls Sinclair all within 5 metres and is pinged for it.
Very frustrating.
Re: 2017 Round 6: Post game Awesomeness - IvanAwfulbigone - 04-29-2017
Certainly a huge turnaround from last week which tells me we really were sore and sorry after the Suns game at Etihad.
Fantastic to see BB focus on our post-half time fadeouts. Giving him full credit for the blitz at the beginning of Q3.
Alex Silvagni - where have you been all my life? Loving the composure of Williamson, can't wait till he bulks up a little.
Wright - I'm sure he has missed a goal in the last 12 months, just can't recall seeing it!
Relieved to hear Rohan is ok - looked sickening at the ground. Very silly on his part. My son refuses to run back with the flight of the ball to mark citing a certain fondness for his life (my words, not his). I won't be trying to dissuade him from what is a sound strategy.
Re: 2017 Round 6: Post game Awesomeness - Raydan - 04-29-2017
(04-29-2017, 09:31 AM)PaulP link Wrote:My understanding is that the minute a player takes his eye off the ball and looks at the player, it's pretty much an automatic free. I was also wondering why Rowe wasn't paid.
Rowe took the mark didn't he?
Re: 2017 Round 6: Post game Awesomeness - kruddler - 04-29-2017
(04-29-2017, 09:59 AM)Raydan link Wrote:Rowe took the mark didn't he?
Sometimes the simplest answer is the right one.
Definitely took (and got paid) the mark.
Re: 2017 Round 6: Post game Awesomeness - DJC - 04-29-2017
(04-29-2017, 09:59 AM)Raydan link Wrote:Rowe took the mark didn't he?
A free kick always takes precedence over a mark. It was inconsequential because Rowe marked and played on but the umpire still should have paid the free.
Re: 2017 Round 6: Post game Awesomeness - PaulP - 04-29-2017
(04-29-2017, 09:59 AM)Raydan link Wrote:Rowe took the mark didn't he?
If ever there was a time to review the inconsistencies in the free kick rules (especially the 50m component) this would be it.
On the one hand, something completely innocuous like moving into the protected zone after a mark gives away a 50 - on the other hand somebody cops a crazy Joe Davola karate kick to the chest/neck (could've easily struck him in the head), and a simple mark is deemed sufficient ?
I call suss. Extremely suss.