![]() |
|
Trumpled (Alternative Leading) - Printable Version +- Carlton Supporters Club (http://new.carltonsc.com) +-- Forum: Social Club (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-6.html) +--- Forum: Blah-Blah Bar (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-23.html) +--- Thread: Trumpled (Alternative Leading) (/thread-2312.html) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
|
Re: US Presidential Election 2016 - Baggers - 07-09-2016 (07-09-2016, 05:21 AM)ElwoodBlues1 link Wrote:She could have picked nearly any of his business ventures if she wanted a failure as a backdrop..... A great Jewish quote really applies to Trump...'He's very lucky his father was born before him.' Re: US Presidential Election 2016 - Mav - 07-09-2016 (07-09-2016, 09:18 AM)cookie2 link Wrote:Just because Trump would be a disaster does not mean she would be any good. It's a choice between the Devil and the deep blue sea IMO. She is a proven liar.OMG, a politician who lies. Fancy that. How would we characterise those lies? Has she claimed that intelligence proves that Saddam Hussein had WMDs? Did she delete 5 million emails to thwart an investigation into whether the White House had engineered the dismissal of 8 US Attorneys? What about swiftboating and hanging chads? Please explain how she could be anywhere near as bad as the last Republican in the White House. Re: US Presidential Election 2016 - cookie2 - 07-09-2016 (07-09-2016, 09:46 AM)Mav link Wrote:OMG, a politician who lies. Fancy that. If you're satisfied Mav then that's your call mate. Re: US Presidential Election 2016 - Mav - 07-09-2016 Of course it would be better if a conservative got in because they tell the truth. Maybe that's because they live their lives according to God's word. Re: US Presidential Election 2016 - cookie2 - 07-09-2016 (07-09-2016, 10:13 AM)Mav link Wrote:Of course it would be better if a conservative got in because they tell the truth. Maybe that's because they live their lives according to God's word. I don't think I was making that claim. What gave you that idea? Re: US Presidential Election 2016 - Mav - 07-09-2016 I can't make out any claim you're making. Apart from claiming that lies disqualify candidates and mean they can't do the job well. I tend to agree with Machiavelli that a politician who can't tell a lie has no business being in charge of a country. Re: US Presidential Election 2016 - cookie2 - 07-09-2016 (07-09-2016, 11:18 AM)Mav link Wrote:I can't make out any claim you're making. Apart from claiming that lies disqualify candidates and mean they can't do the job well. I tend to agree with Machiavelli that a politician who can't tell a lie has no business being in charge of a country. I'm expressing my view that just because Trump would likely make a disastrous president doesn't mean that Hilary would necessarily make a good one. If she gets the gig prepare to be disappointed - it would be an appointment to be endured not celebrated IMO. If you're happy to be lied to and led by the nose then that is undoubtedly your own choice - personally I'd prefer someone a bit better than that. Maybe I'm just asking for too much? Re: US Presidential Election 2016 - Mav - 07-09-2016 The conventional wisdom, at least amongst Democrats, is that Hillary is a poor campaigner but is a good operator when she wins. She's not my dream candidate - Barack Obama is. She would start her presidency, though, with an advantage over Obama 2008. She realises just how partisan and obstructive the GOP is and she won't repeat Obama's naïveté in that regard. She's spent well over 2 decades standing at ground zero while the GOP went nuclear against Bill and her. She won't make the mistake of thinking she can appeal to Congress for goodwill and bipartisanship. Re: US Presidential Election 2016 - DJC - 07-09-2016 (07-09-2016, 09:18 AM)cookie2 link Wrote:Just because Trump would be a disaster does not mean she would be any good. It's a choice between the Devil and the deep blue sea IMO. She is a proven liar. How can you tell if a politician is lying? Their lips are moving. Of course, you can substitute many other occupations for politicians without affecting the validity of the observation. Re: US Presidential Election 2016 - cookie2 - 07-09-2016 (07-09-2016, 12:29 PM)DJC link Wrote:How can you tell if a politician is lying? Golden oldie there DJC! ![]() Anyway, poor Hillary hasn't even mastered the basic stock in trade of a politician if that were the case - hasn't she been caught out numerous times on even some pretty pathetic ones? |