Carlton Supporters Club
CV and mad panic behaviour - Printable Version

+- Carlton Supporters Club (http://new.carltonsc.com)
+-- Forum: Social Club (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-6.html)
+--- Forum: Blah-Blah Bar (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-23.html)
+--- Thread: CV and mad panic behaviour (/thread-4651.html)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743


Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - madbluboy - 08-07-2021

Treatments for covid is just nonsense. If everyone got covid how are you going to treat them all?


Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Mav - 08-07-2021

True. The irony is that vaccinations are driven by these outbreaks but those rushing to get the jab are too late to protect themselves against this outbreak. I’m still waiting for my 2nd shot and even when I get it I’ll have to wait another 2 weeks for it to give me maximal benefit.

There was an article from a science reporter in The Age who pointed out that people irrationally take into account the likelihood they’ll be infected with Covid in the next week or so. When Covid is well contained, people therefore think there’s little risk of infection, so the infinitesimal risk of an adverse reaction to the vaccine isn’t worth taking. The reporter points out that we should be assuming we’ll all be exposed to Covid at some point in the future, so we should weigh the risk of death or serious injury from a Covid infection against the risk of death or serious injury from taking the vaccine. And particularly for older people, taking the vaccine is the only rational choice. As the reporter points out, who has managed to escape colds or flu over the last few years? Once Covid becomes endemic, it’s only a matter of time until it does the rounds.


Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Gointocarlton - 08-07-2021

(08-07-2021, 02:34 AM)madbluboy link Wrote:Vaccinations is the only way to beat covid. We haven't been able to have visitors in our homes for a month and we had 29 cases in one day.
Sydney are locked down and it still can't stop this.
That doesn't stop people from doing the wrong thing, visit each other and this case, spread the virus resulting in another lockdown. If people did the right thing, we'd at least stand half a chance. As for all the cockheads protesting the other night, I'd just put a bullet between their eyes (apologies if this offends but...)


Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 08-07-2021

I'm liking this thread more and more by the day! ;D


Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - flyboy77 - 08-07-2021

(08-07-2021, 02:09 AM)Mav link Wrote:Hot off the press from FactCheck.org: Idaho Doctor Makes Baseless Claims About Safety of COVID-19 Vaccines.

Surely you could post some more reputable stuff. If you’d posted about a Doctor screaming about Demon blood, at least that would have been more interesting.

Those fact check sites are drivel.

As is your usual, incapable of addressing the substance so swipe at the man.....

He's a nationally recognised pathologist. Eminently qualified to comment.


Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 08-07-2021

(08-07-2021, 06:25 AM)flyboy77 date Wrote:Those fact check sites are drivel.

As is your usual, incapable of addressing the substance so swipe at the man.....

He's a nationally recognised pathologist. Eminently qualified to comment.
The Pfizer and AZ death rates globally are very similar, the AZ deaths are primarily related to the 1st shot, the Pfizer deaths are equally distributed between 1st and 2nd shot. Both average between 1 and 2 deaths per million doses.

Hmm, his math is drivel, 11,045 vaccine deaths in the US would need 11,045,000,000 vaccination doses to even get close to that tally! Unless of course Pfizer is magically 30x to 40x more deadly just to Americans! He also mentions "25,000", "45,000" vaccine deaths in the USA.

He claims "they report" not one death from vaccine, he claims "they tell you" nobody hurt from vaccine, he claims "that is what 'they' tell you"

That is his lie, a few of them, obvious lies!

The USA has only purchased about 500,000,000 Pfizer doses, and has only issued 208,000,000 Pfizer doses to July 2021, so based on the 208,000,000 Pfizer doses issued the Dr is claiming 53 deaths per million vaccine doses!




Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - flyboy77 - 08-07-2021

(08-07-2021, 06:33 AM)LP link Wrote:Hmm, his math is drivel, 11,045 vaccine deaths in the US would need 1,200,000,000 vaccinations! Unless Pfizer is 4x more deadly just to Americans!

He claims "they report" not one death from vaccine, nobody hurt from vaccine, he claims "that is what they tell you"

That is his lie!

The USA has only purchased about 500,000,000 Pfizer doses, and has only issued 208,000,000 Pfizer doses to July 2021! :o

Hear of the word hyperbole LP?

What rubbish. The 11,000? He's simply citing VAERS - which everyone knows vastly under reports the reality.

Bleat as long and hard as you like, the facts are the facts.

And you've done exactly zero to provide ANY evidence to refute any of the data I've put up.

Ah, the UK's latest variant report was out yesterday. Simply confirms my earlier conclusions (and slams yours).

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1009243/Technical_Briefing_20.pdf

My last comment on this as too many of you have your heads firmly below ground.

Caveat emptor.


Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 08-07-2021

(08-07-2021, 06:46 AM)flyboy77 date Wrote:My last comment on this as too many of you have your heads firmly below ground.
Awww, sorry to see you run away, didn't mean to hurt. Sad

Taking your ball and going home, or can I call a Waaahmbulance!

PS: Just trying to live up to the Ad Hominem accusations! ;D


Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Mav - 08-07-2021

(08-07-2021, 06:25 AM)flyboy77 link Wrote:Those fact check sites are drivel.

As is your usual, incapable of addressing the substance so swipe at the man.....

He's a nationally recognised pathologist. Eminently qualified to comment.
I’ve noticed you tend to project your faults on others. You regularly engage in ad hominem attacks but accuse others of using that tactic. And then you condemn taking “swipes at the man” but you do so immediately after declaring “Those fact check sites are drivel.” Hypocritical at best.

Of course, you know the fact check article we posted didn’t just say “he’s a wanker”. The fact checkers critiqued the good doctor methodically and compendiously. Just to take but 1 aspect:
Quote:To those bogus claims, Cole has now added: “mRNA trials in mammals have led to odd cancers. mRNA trials on mammals have led to autoimmune diseases — not right away, six, nine, 12 months later.”

We asked Cole to provide support for those claims, and he referred us to a 2018 paper published in the journal Nature Reviews Drug Discovery that reviewed trials and studies of various, earlier mRNA vaccines.

But that paper doesn’t support his statement.

Norbert Pardi, a research assistant professor of medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, was the lead author of the paper. He told us in an email, “No publications demonstrate that mRNA vaccines cause cancer or autoimmune diseases.”

Pardi’s 19-page paper does make one passing reference to autoimmune diseases, which is what Cole highlighted to us.

The paper says: “A possible concern could be that some mRNA-based vaccine platforms induce potent type I interferon responses, which have been associated not only with inflammation but also potentially with autoimmunity. Thus, identification of individuals at an increased risk of autoimmune reactions before mRNA vaccination may allow reasonable precautions to be taken.”

But, Pardi explained, he and the other researchers included that passage because they wanted to note some potential concerns. However, he emphasized that “no scientific evidence has confirmed that these concerns are real.”

It’s also worth noting that the paper predated the COVID-19 pandemic by two years, so it doesn’t include any information specifically about the COVID-19 vaccines.

Simply put, “there is no scientific evidence that shows that mRNA vaccines cause autoimmune diseases,” Pardi said. “Multiple clinical trials have been performed with mRNA vaccines in the past 10 years and none of them found that mRNA vaccination caused autoimmune diseases. Further, we are not aware of any studies showing an autoimmune disease appearing many months after vaccination as Dr. Cole inaccurately suggests.”

Likewise, Dr. Roger Shapiro, associate professor of immunology and infectious diseases at Harvard’s T.H. Chan School of Public Health, told us in an email that he was unaware of any study that would support Cole’s claim that the vaccines are carcinogenic.

“There is nothing in the science of mRNA vaccines that would suggest carcinogenicity, and they have been tested in humans for other diseases before COVID-19,” Shapiro said. “mRNA rapidly breaks down in the body, and probably does not last long enough to act as a carcinogen.”

“Regarding autoimmunity,” he said, “this is always a concern with any medical product, but there is no evidence to date suggesting it, and it does not seem any more likely than with other vaccines. mRNA is made all the time in our bodies, and delivering it by vaccine should not be different.”

Dr. Dean Winslow, an infectious disease physician at Stanford Health Care, concurred with the other experts with whom we spoke. In a phone interview, he characterized Cole’s claims about cancer as “fearmongering” and said, “There’s just no scientific basis for that.”

“We’re talking about these very small fragments of messenger RNA that don’t hang around for long at all,” he said, noting that the mRNA vaccines have been in use for almost six months and have been “very safe, very well-tolerated vaccines.”

Winslow recognized that some people are concerned that the mRNA from the vaccine might persist in their bodies and somehow change their genetics or cause long-term effects. So he emphasized that the vaccines have small fragments of RNA, which survive only briefly and carry information about the virus that causes COVID-19.

Similarly, Pardi told us, “COVID-19 mRNA vaccines do not alter our DNA and they get rapidly degraded so they do not promote cancer formation.”
Fancy that: the good doctor makes a bombshell claim that mRNA trials had led to autoimmune disease but when challenged he sought to rely on a paper whose lead author says his paper didn’t support that claim. And experts in the area call Cole out for fearmongering and having no scientific basis for his claims.

And remember this is just one baseless claim amongst others that were methodically  debunked.

Well, well, well, it looks as though the good doctor is nationally recognised as a fraud.




Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 08-07-2021

(08-07-2021, 08:14 AM)Mav date Wrote:Fancy that: the good doctor makes a bombshell claim that mRNA trials had led to autoimmune disease but when challenged he sought to rely on a paper whose lead author says his paper didn’t support that claim. And experts in the area call Cole out for fearmongering and having no scientific basis for his claims.
I can't help but feel that I have come across this tactic before!