CV and mad panic behaviour - Printable Version

CV and mad panic behaviour - Printable Version

+- Carlton Supporters Club (http://new.carltonsc.com)
+-- Forum: Social Club (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-6.html)
+--- Forum: Blah-Blah Bar (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-23.html)
+--- Thread: CV and mad panic behaviour (/thread-4651.html)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Mav - 07-29-2021

One thing I read suggests the difficulty with the modelling is that only 40% of people are staying home. If 80% of people stayed home, the lockdown might be more successful.

One problem is that keeping shops open and classing those that work there as essential workers means those workers need to leave the house to go to work. And those workers are probably more likely to hail from the locked down areas than from the elite North Shore.

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - PaulP - 07-29-2021

(07-29-2021, 01:46 AM)Mav link Wrote:I can only go the headline as I’m blocked by the paywall: Scientists split over whether Sydney’s lockdown is tight enough to tame outbreak, The Age.

If you delete your cache and history you should be able to access both the Age and SMH. I think there's a 5 article limit, unless it changed recently.

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 07-29-2021

(07-29-2021, 02:14 AM)Mav date Wrote:One problem is that keeping shops open and classing those that work there as essential workers means those workers need to leave the house to go to work. And those workers are probably more likely to hail from the locked down areas than from the elite North Shore.

Gladys had boutique clothing stores and bespoke shoe stores as essential businesses.

It was a lockdown joke!

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Mav - 07-29-2021

Unbelievable! The traffic controller at the Moonee Valley Covid Testing site who tested positive had refused the vaccine. The unvaccinated shouldn’t be employed in jobs where they’re likely to come into contact with infected people . Sack any who aren’t vaccinated.

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - shawny - 07-29-2021

(07-29-2021, 08:15 AM)Mav link Wrote:Unbelievable! The traffic controller at the Moonee Valley Covid Testing site who tested positive had refused the vaccine. The unvaccinated shouldn’t be employed in jobs where they’re likely to come into contact with infected people . Sack any who aren’t vaccinated.

Why do people relate being vaccinated with reducing the chance of transmission? The vaccines offer little to no resistance to contracting Covid and no help at all against transmitting it. They are both solely formulated to reduce the severity of Covid to assist which inturn reduces the pressure on the public health system.

I know if you watch the daily ground hog day reports many give the impression that if you have the vaccine you are safe to be around and we will only be safe and Covid free once the whole nation (starting off as the elderly, then included the mid age now that want children vaccinated) but this is just another lie for those in charge. The current vaccines are for the sole personal protection of those who receive it and hence why i see very little benefit in vaccinating young adults and are dead against vaccinating children! As a matter of fact once they included vaccinating children in their PR spin, that was the point when i started to really wonder if the advise we are getting is accurate and hence why imo its every persons choice to take it or not to take it. I'm perfectly fine either way and think each person should have the discussion with their doctor and make a decision accordingly and as children have little issue with Covid exposing them to these sorts of vaccines is a far greater risk as they simply havent been around long enough to see the real effects on them.

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Gointocarlton - 07-29-2021

(07-29-2021, 08:15 AM)Mav link Wrote:Unbelievable! The traffic controller at the Moonee Valley Covid Testing site who tested positive had refused the vaccine. The unvaccinated shouldn’t be employed in jobs where they’re likely to come into contact with infected people . Sack any who aren’t vaccinated.

And did I hear correctly that he visited his GF at the Maribyrnong apartment that was in total isolation? Sack and fine the kent and his GF immediately.

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Thryleon - 07-29-2021

Myth busters.

1. The unvaccinated guy may not have refused a vaccine, he just wasn't vaccinated. Not long ago, they were turning people away for first dose because Pfizer wasn't available.

2. He wasn't involved in close contact with people being tested he just worked at the site in moonee valley.

3. He visited his girlfriend at the Newport apartments that have resulted in them being shut down, not whilst they were shut down.

Now I've got that out of the way, I'll post another myth buster.

Yes its true, vaccination doesn't stop you catching nor spreading the virus, BUT if you did catch covid the window of viral shedding and load, will likely be smaller in someone who is vaccinated vs someone unvaccinated.

You could argue that someone vaccinated might be more likely to spread it if they ignore mild symptoms because they might not even know they're sick, but either way there's no guarantees.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.abc.net.au/article/100332454

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Mav - 07-29-2021

(07-29-2021, 12:03 PM)Thryleon link Wrote:Myth busters.

1. The unvaccinated guy may not have refused a vaccine, he just wasn't vaccinated. Not long ago, they were turning people away for first dose because Pfizer wasn't available.
The media report was that he was offered the vaccine and turned it down. I don’t post rumours drawn from social media or Snowy from the Pub.

2. He wasn't involved in close contact with people being tested he just worked at the site in moonee valley.
We’d better hope he caught it at the testing sire and that’s the working theory of authorities. All it takes is a conversation with someone coming for a test. If this assumption is incorrect, then there’s a mystery case in the community who infected him at some unknown place. That’ll ring alarm bells.

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Thryleon - 07-29-2021

What constitutes refusal of a vaccine anyway?

Did he sign a waiver saying he wouldn't get one?

According to the abc article i googled this is the quote:

Quote:"It's an important point that this individual was not having really close, direct contact with people coming through those testing sites, as someone who was assessing to direct traffic," he said.

I know people refusing to take a vaccine that currently are health care workers and will get one on their terms.

You see a lot in our health care networks. I know people who have some trepidation in vaccination. They're delaying for now but not refusing. I imagine this guy is similar.

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Mav - 07-29-2021

Online dictionary definition of ‘refuse’:

Quote:indicate that one is not willing to accept or grant (something offered or requested).
"she refused a cigarette"

A refusal can be a one-time-only thing. Running with the example of the woman who refused a cigarette, she may well have accepted a cigarette the next time one was offered.