![]() |
|
Who is our best 22? - Printable Version +- Carlton Supporters Club (http://new.carltonsc.com) +-- Forum: Princes Park (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-4.html) +--- Forum: Robert Heatley Stand (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-14.html) +--- Thread: Who is our best 22? (/thread-5737.html) |
Re: Who is our best 22? - kruddler - 07-27-2022 (07-27-2022, 10:22 AM)tonyo link Wrote:How did Young get an extra vote? All of the usual suspects are on 15, and he is on 16......There was someone who seemingly voted for all the worst players.....guess he didn't know who young was and voted for him too. There are 16 people who have voted. Re: Who is our best 22? - tonyo - 07-27-2022 (07-26-2022, 11:16 AM)townsendcalling link Wrote:Correct. I can see Young being overlooked depending on who we play. If Marchy, Gov and Weitering are all on the park and good to go then there will be a couple of oppositions where that 'tall 3' combo might be more effective. Young is a lock in my book. Our best recruit this year (slightly shades Hewitt). When Jones was gone, our backline was looking very thin. But it is better than ever now, due in no small part to Young. He has one of the best spoils in the game. What were the Bulldogs thinking? Re: Who is our best 22? - kruddler - 07-28-2022 (07-27-2022, 11:16 AM)tonyo link Wrote:Young is a lock in my book. Our best recruit this year (slightly shades Hewitt). Given the amount if i juries we've had,especially from key backs, if we didnt recruit young there is no chance we'd be playing finals this year. Zero. Re: Who is our best 22? - Thryleon - 07-28-2022 Shouldnt we be choosing 23? 4 interchange and a sub? Re: Who is our best 22? - WASurfer - 07-28-2022 Marchbank looked pretty good in that one game back against Essendon and it will be a nice "problem" to have if we get all of him, McGovern and Young up and running at the same time. But Young definitely in the best 22 IMO. Just his sheer size means he can play on the big key forwards or resting ruckman. Re: Who is our best 22? - kruddler - 07-28-2022 (07-28-2022, 01:41 AM)Thryleon link Wrote:Shouldnt we be choosing 23?I thought about it, but then i thought its a bit of a cop out. 22 will play. 23 if you're unlucky. Do you include 3 more for emergencies if there is a late change too? You gotta stop somewhere. I stopped at 22. If there was a way to change the poll to include a 'specific sub' then i would have. |