+- Carlton Supporters Club (http://new.carltonsc.com)
+-- Forum: Princes Park (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: Robert Heatley Stand (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-14.html)
+--- Thread: Jim Park Voting; Round 1: Carlton vs Richmond (/thread-2612.html)
Re: Jim Park Voting; Round 1: Carlton vs Richmond - percy - 03-25-2016
C+
5: Murphy
4: Gibbs
3: Cripps
2: Docherty
1: Simpson
HM: Weitering,Curnow,Wright,Kerridge, Graham
Re: Jim Park Voting; Round 1: Carlton vs Richmond - PassIt2Carrots - 03-25-2016
Sheesh Brettie.....grumpelstiltskin bro lol.
Re: Jim Park Voting; Round 1: Carlton vs Richmond - flyboy77 - 03-25-2016
B-
5: Murphy
4: Cripps
2 Weitering
1: Docherty
1: Wright
1 Gibbs
1 Curnow
Re: Jim Park Voting; Round 1: Carlton vs Richmond - OuterBlues - 03-25-2016
Team - C+
5 - Murphy
4 - Gibbs
3 - Cripps
2 - Docherty
1 - Wright
Re: Jim Park Voting; Round 1: Carlton vs Richmond - sandsmere - 03-25-2016
Team. C
5. Murphy
3. Cripps
3. Gibbs
2. Docherty
1. Simpson
1. Wright
Re: Jim Park Voting; Round 1: Carlton vs Richmond - Shakin77 - 03-26-2016
(03-25-2016, 12:02 AM)BluePhantom link Wrote:Everyone is rating Gibb's game, but I didn't see it that way.
He was still tooooo cruzey and didn't put his body on the line and seemed like he was just after the easy balls.
He needs to play with a harder more aggressive edge for my liking.
For a player of his ilk, he floats in and out of games too often and doesn't demand the footy.
Need better from him and I think we always will want better. Will never achieve the highs we expect of him for a no.1 pick. For a pick 55 he played well.
Killed Bambi too
Re: Jim Park Voting; Round 1: Carlton vs Richmond - DJC - 03-26-2016
(03-26-2016, 06:14 AM)Shakin77 link Wrote:Killed Bambi too
Good thing Craig Bradley is not still playing
Re: Jim Park Voting; Round 1: Carlton vs Richmond - laj - 03-26-2016
(03-25-2016, 07:23 AM)DJC link Wrote:As and Bs for a loss to an undermanned opposition? Folk must really be starved of success!
Anyway, I was under the impression that there wasn't to be any discussion of votes or team ratings. If people want to be overly generous and dish out extravagant ratings for losing a game we should have won, then go right ahead. I won't lose sleep over it.
Undermanned? They were only without Deliedo, Maric and Grigg. They would've only have triuly missed Deliedio of that lot.
Everything has to be taken in context. We were expected to be no good and pumped with our list and very nearly won. If we were a gun side and lost then a D or E, as a cellar dweller nearly beating a top 5 side, worth a B-. That's my best possible score for a loss.
Re: Jim Park Voting; Round 1: Carlton vs Richmond - DJC - 03-26-2016
(03-26-2016, 06:40 AM)laj link Wrote:Undermanned? They were only without Deliedo, Maric and Grigg. They would've only have triuly missed Deliedio of that lot.
Everything has to be taken in context. We were expected to be no good and pumped with our list and very nearly won. If we were a gun side and lost then a D or E, as a cellar dweller nearly beating a top 5 side, worth a B-. That's my best possible score for a loss.
I really don't care what rating you give the team. I happen to believe that losing is unacceptable and, while I may go to a C for a hard fought loss, that's my limit.
What's a 10 goal win worth, A++++++? How about about a 20 goal win in a grand final?
We could debate this ad nauseum, not to mention folk who refuse to give Gibbs votes, but that's not the purpose of this thread. We all have our own way of voting and rating teams, it's subjective, and there's no right or wrong way and nothing to gain by arguing about it.
Re: Jim Park Voting; Round 1: Carlton vs Richmond - Slugger - 03-26-2016
5 Murph
4 Gibbs
3 Cripps
2 Simpson
1 Doc
Team B