![]() |
|
CV and mad panic behaviour - Printable Version +- Carlton Supporters Club (http://new.carltonsc.com) +-- Forum: Social Club (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-6.html) +--- Forum: Blah-Blah Bar (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-23.html) +--- Thread: CV and mad panic behaviour (/thread-4651.html) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
|
Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Mav - 07-21-2021 Let’s hope it doesn’t get to Omega. In Star Trek canon, the Omega particle was capable of extinguishing all life. Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - capcom - 07-21-2021 (07-21-2021, 12:22 PM)Mav link Wrote:Let’s hope it doesn’t get to Omega. In Star Trek canon, the Omega particle was capable of extinguishing all life. Good one Seven Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - DJC - 07-21-2021 It doesn't seem that long ago that we were discussing India, the virulence of the Delta strain and how well or how bad India was handling the pandemic. It seems that COVID may be "modern India's worst human tragedy." https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-07-21/india-covid-deaths-could-be-in-the-millions/100310602?utm_medium=social&utm_content=sf247814345&utm_campaign=fb_abc_news&utm_source=m.facebook.com&sf247814345=1&fbclid=IwAR2EuaETn3eGfGNnIQce__WyEYFKMo_hn3Bpwp9WkeUZMMpMfpN9iwvaqrQ Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - capcom - 07-21-2021 (07-21-2021, 01:13 PM)DJC link Wrote:It doesn't seem that long ago that we were discussing India, the virulence of the Delta strain and how well or how bad India was handling the pandemic. Yes. Calm the public. Utter nonsense Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 07-21-2021 (07-21-2021, 07:08 AM)DJC date Wrote:The University of Melbourne modelling team that has guided Victorian Government responses to COVID outbreaks has crunched the NSW numbers:It's highly likely there are departments in both the State and Federal Health authorities that already had these types of figures, ............... and yet they can't pull the triggers! Imagine the complaints if people were told 6 to 8 weeks from the get go, but we have to go early and hard, otherwise it's going to be 5 months! What happened to just telling the public the truth? I complain about naysayers and deniers being merchants of doubt, I think in our leaders we have a electoral college of certain uncertainty! Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - DJC - 07-21-2021 (07-21-2021, 10:05 PM)LP link Wrote:It's highly likely there are departments in both the State and Federal Health authorities that already had these types of figures, ............... and yet they can't pull the triggers! The modelling team offers their services to any governments, free of charge. Their work is fascinating and it’s incredible how slight changes to a variable will result in very different outcomes. Best of all, they’re so open and transparent with their work. Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Baggers - 07-21-2021 (07-21-2021, 07:08 AM)DJC link Wrote:The University of Melbourne modelling team that has guided Victorian Government responses to COVID outbreaks has crunched the NSW numbers: Great article, thank you, David. (I trust you realise my comment about Gladys doing a great job with her consistency to keep daily nos high was heavily laced with sarcasm ) So had Gladys adopted the VIC model from the get-go how many weeks of lockdown & lockdown lite could have been avoided?
Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Mav - 07-22-2021 Interesting developments. In the US, conservative politicians and media are starting to advocate vaccination. Previously, FoxNews’ nighttime hosts were anti-vaxxers and you’d have to think management was supporting or orchestrating that for ratings and therefore $$. But Sean Hannity has now told viewers he has been vaccinated and it’s safe and effective, urging viewers to do the same. Chris Ruddy, owner of Newsmax, has released an editorial extolling vaccinations. Ron DeSantis, Governor of Florida and a Republican leading the chase to be the Republican Presidential candidate in 2024 has begged Floridians to vaccinate, saying that just about all of the recent admissions to hosputal were unvaccinated. Mitch McConnell, GOP Senate leader, and Steve Scalise, GOP deputy leader in the House, have both joined in calls to vaccinate. This is a welcome development even if Trump supporters might be unmoved. Why now? Maybe conservatives are realising they don’t want to go to the 2022 midterms as the anti-vaxxer party, especially after Biden used his bully pulpit to call them out. It also seems that Singapore has backflipped on its “learn to live with Covid” strategy, according to News.com.au. Only 4 days ago, restrictions were relaxed, e.g. groups of 5 vaccinated people could eat in restaurants (up from 2) and 5 people could socialise. But Covid then spiked and now restrictions have been reintroduced, e.g. only takeaway food is allowed and groups of more than 2 are prohibited. https://www.news.com.au/world/coronavirus/global/singapore-reintroduces-covid19-restrictions-days-after-relaxing-rules/news-story/d9ec0e764ce24e0279a2bf7c2fba1d45 Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 07-22-2021 (07-22-2021, 04:54 AM)Mav date Wrote:It also seems that Singapore has backflipped on its “learn to live with Covid” strategy, according to News.com.au. Only 4 days ago, restrictions were relaxed, e.g. groups of 5 vaccinated people could eat in restaurants (up from 2) and 5 people could socialise. But Covid then spiked and now restrictions have been reintroduced, e.g. only takeaway food is allowed and groups of more than 2 are prohibited.Ignoring what is happening in most places this is a hell of a tell. I'd say Singapore was "The Gold Standard" for Sars-CoV-2 preparedness, having learned the lessons of the original Sars. Then just a few weeks back they were all in with the UK in calling for borders to be opened up to save the economies, and now as you point out Singapore has flipped. I think it's a safe bet the UK might be back in the bleachers soon as well. A lot of this is because they see the infected average age dropping very quickly, ICU's are no longer the preserve of +65 year olds or the chronically ill comorbidities, we are seeing otherwise healthy 20 or 30 somethings starting to fill beds. Then there is the rising infection rate in the under 16 sector, which for the original strains was almost rarer than hens teeth, but is now becoming common place. I am cynical though, because I suspect the aging bureaucrats and politicians no longer see themselves getting priority access to an ICU bed when they may be competing for slots with children and youths. So now they are "Ya'll better get a vaccine!" Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - flyboy77 - 07-22-2021 (07-22-2021, 05:30 AM)LP link Wrote:Ignoring what is happening in most places this is a hell of a tell. I'd say Singapore was "The Gold Standard" for Sars-CoV-2 preparedness, having learned the lessons of the original Sars. Then just a few weeks back they were all in with the UK in calling for borders to be opened up to save the economies, and now as you point out Singapore has flipped. I think it's a safe bet the UK might be back in the bleachers soon as well. The whole use of the term 'infection' is a con if you're basing it on positive PCR test results. Without clinical diagnosis. Here in Victoria, with the fabulous BGI (B = Beijing) PCR test: "Any result up to Ct of 40 is considered positive. Cycle thresholds of 40-45 are examined with further testing." https://health.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2020/06/post-market-validation-of-the-beijing-genomics-institute-bgi-sars-cov-2-real-time-pcr-platform.pdf NSW run their tests at up to 40 to 45x cycles. The great Fauci says, in This Week in Virology this month: “If you get a cycle threshold of 35 or more … the chances of it being replication-competent are minuscule.” Which is backed up by the science. Quote:At a ct of 30, 20% of samples remained positive; at a ct of 35, 3% ; "at a ct above 35, no sample remained positive (infectious) in cell culture. Other studies suggest a lower cycle threshold number is necessary for some level of validity: https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/71/10/2663/5842165 Quote:SARS-CoV-2 Vero cell infectivity was only observed for RT-PCR Ct < 24 and STT < 8 days. Infectivity of patients with Ct > 24 and duration of symptoms > 8 days may be low. This information can inform public health policy and guide clinical... Kary Mullis himself said 20x (which is 2 to the power of 20 remember) was the maximum that should be used. Essentially 100% false positives at cycle threshold numbers of 35 or more. https://swprs.org/the-trouble-with-pcr-tests/ Moreover, as the WHO states: Quote:The cycle threshold needed to detect virus is inversely proportional to the patient’s viral load. Where test results do not correspond with clinical presentation, a new specimen should be taken and retested using the same or different NAT [Nucleic Acid Technology] technology. And this is why the pollies get to muck around with our lives at their whim - off the back of an unfit for purpose test, never designed or meant for diagnostic purposes. |