(07-16-2021, 01:54 AM)flyboy77 link Wrote:Very funny Mav - i never realised you were so sensitive petal. Sorry  :

(07-16-2021, 02:02 AM)PaulP date Wrote:That study is 200 pages long, and I'd guess even if I did read it all, a fair whack would go over my head. Just reading the executive summary, it seems to focus on "children, adolescents and young adults of child bearing age". The first two are obvious enough, but what age group does the last category include ?

Quote:While infection tends to grant better immunity than vaccination most of the time, getting the disease is associated with a higher risk of death and health complications. Vaccines generate immunity in people while avoiding the risks associated with the disease itself. The amount of spike protein generated by COVID-19 vaccination is too low to cause damage.

(07-16-2021, 01:26 AM)LP link Wrote:Variety is the spice of life, there is burgeoning evidence cross vaccination might provide the best response of all. Resilient systems have redundancy built in either by accident or by design.

What is the technology of the Novavax based vaccine solution?

Have you been vaccinated [member=57]ElwoodBlues1[/member] , what is your personal stance on this issue?

(07-16-2021, 02:20 AM)ElwoodBlues1 date Wrote:I'm no scientific expert but the Novavax is based on older proven technology that was used to design the Hep B vaccine and the Pertussis vaccine. Reported Trials have shown it to be more effective with less side effects but again those trials would be small in numbers and you would need to look at age groups for effectiveness/side effects etc.
While being based on older technology it has the advantage of whats known in the business world as a late start so they have had a chance to look at the other vaccines and learn a bit more about how they have fared.
Have I been vaccinated?....No...Will I get Vaccinated?....Yes...when I think there is a vaccine/s that suits my criteria, needs and more data available to make that choice. Never been one to follow the herd especially especially when politicians with agendas are directing the traffic...
Hopefully the Novavax is that vaccine but I'm sure if it as superior as being marketed that ScoMo and friends will be saving it for themselves before it filters down to the plebs...

(07-16-2021, 02:23 AM)LP link Wrote:So do you want the truth, or would you prefer to stick with your beliefs?

(07-16-2021, 01:42 AM)flyboy77 link Wrote:Your tackling is about as innocuous as most of our current players. Sadly.

(07-16-2021, 02:04 AM)LP link Wrote:We can't take anything offered by Dr Peter "HCQ" McCullough seriously, he's been discredited repeatedly for the last six months with every formal large scale study showing his original paper is worthless, at least in a scientific context, politically perhaps the paper is quite valuable when much of your funding comes from the certain right wing sources.

And yes, an R[sub]0[/sub] = 7.0 is about a magnitude more infectious than R[sub]0[/sub] = 2.5, so actually worse than 3x, the 3x Macron allegedly states, well maybe that a lost in translation moment, the question is was that a mistake on Dr HCQ's part of deviously manipulated for political purposes?

(07-16-2021, 02:34 AM)Baggers link Wrote:If it was so 'innocuous' why did you arc up so?

An important distinction. What Wingman MAV pointed out -- Epoch/Falon Gong/Qanon -- in response to your point of argument was to question the sources of your information. That is NOT playing the man, that is playing the ball.

You referred to Wingman MAV as 'petal' - that is condescension, which is person, which is playing the man.