![]() |
|
CV and mad panic behaviour - Printable Version +- Carlton Supporters Club (http://new.carltonsc.com) +-- Forum: Social Club (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-6.html) +--- Forum: Blah-Blah Bar (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-23.html) +--- Thread: CV and mad panic behaviour (/thread-4651.html) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
|
Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - flyboy77 - 07-11-2021 (07-11-2021, 02:30 AM)PaulP link Wrote:This is a very poor line of argumentation. You know that covid can spread like wildfire, you know that it only takes a few selfish inconsiderate people to do great damage despite best practice policies from governments. You know that there are many players and stakeholders involved in successful management of something like this. There's no point in giving a blow by blow account of what went down. It's already been covered earlier in this thread. Do we know that really? Sure, that is what the media (and even LP) tell us, but what do the numbers tell us? Yesterday in NSW, in the midst of the 'hyper contagious' Delta strain, 82 out of 48,754 test came up positive (and I won't revisit the flaws in the PCR test again - https://swprs.org/the-trouble-with-pcr-tests/ - other than to say it appears all States have been running the test at Ct amplification rates far in excess of what is reasonable). 82 of 48,754 = 0.17% 1 old lady died (condolences), but on average 460 odd folk die each and every day in this country. Perspective! The simple fact is that CV19 is remarkably (far more than flu) targeted to hammer the older age demographics - and no one else - under 50, it's neither here nor there - see chart. There are presently 112 folk in hospital, 18 in ICU. Yet in the last bad flu season, 2019, there were 250 odd folk in ICU. Meanwhile, in the UK, one of the highest vaxx populations, globally, case numbers are exploding - over 30,000 now compared to 600 odd the same time a year ago. Out of 257 people to die from the DELTA Variant, 92 were unvaxxed, 47 Single vaxxed and 118 Double vaxxed. Hmmm. Draw your own conclusions. Over in the US, VAERS reported vaccine related deaths tops 9,000. Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - capcom - 07-11-2021 One thing I do know I'm heartily sick of are the cops and their meaningless threats. Same old same old every single day. Many people don't care anymore and won't listen to state governments like they once did. Or the trumped up "health professionals" Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 07-11-2021 The Sars-CoV-2 Delta strain no longer shows a preference for the elderly, with the 50/50 spilt between young and old cases shifted to about 50 years old. Previously it was up at about 65 years old so that is a 15 year shift in the pivot point. I'm not sure what people think, but if they think people in the 35 to 50 year old bracket are oldies then we are in serious trouble! Despite the cherry-picked figures reported by some websites, the official UK government figures will tell you death and infection rates for double vaccinated individuals is reduced to at least 1/3rd of single or non-vaccinated. Using VAERS or the Yellow Card system for data is like asking the Hitler Neo Nazi youth for an unbiased opinion if Judaism, the VAERS and Yellow Card self-reporting systems are broken by self-reporting radicals making those voluntary reporting systems virtually worthless. The only true data is the data coming out of hospitals and ICUs. There is irony in anti-vaxxers arguing against vaccination based on deaths of double vaccinated patients from the Delta variant, they seem to have arrived at the logic that the virus is so deadly vaccines won't save you, but the also argue against lockdowns, they can't have it both ways. If vaccines can't help you lockdowns and restrictions will become the norm that is self-evident. If you want to avoid lockdowns get vaccinated, the rate of infection and death drops by 70% which seems somewhat worthwhile! Delta variant is leaving young people with severe long COVID effects, death is one of those long term effects. Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - flyboy77 - 07-11-2021 (07-11-2021, 03:40 AM)LP link Wrote:The Sars-CoV-2 Delta strain no longer shows a preference for the elderly, with the 50/50 spilt between young and old cases shifted to about 50 years old. Previously it was up at about 65 years old so that is a 15 year shift in the pivot point. You're conflating. The reported death number (257) is a system number - nothing to do with VAERS or the like - but of course you know that. Cherry picked? Not at all. Your Hitler Youth analogy is beyond silly (trying to be polite) and another facile straw man attempt. As for VAERS, or the EMA or Yellow Card numbers, of course far from perfect, but are they a legitimate signal? Of course they are. Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - flyboy77 - 07-11-2021 Some more cherry picking from the UK: Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - ElwoodBlues1 - 07-11-2021 We had hundreds die in Victoria at the peak of the original CoVid19 outbreak and there are conflicting reports of the Delta being more or less deadly and I think its going to be important going forward to see if this version is indeed more deadly or the virus while spreading at a greater rate is killing as many people. Hopefully the mutations will make it weaker and we have less fatalities and learn a bit more, as for Gladys she has been caught on the fence playing popularity politics vs an extreme lockdown.....no real middle ground for her. We can really only judge her when this outbreak is controlled and the number of fatalities. The difference between her and Dan to me is the lack of ownership from Dan with regard the quarantine debacle where he botched the security and then lied about who was responsible afterwards. But that is old news and I hope the people of NSW dont have the same numbers of fatalities we did, my wife has a lot of her family in NSW and I hope Gladys gets her act together and does a better job than Dan initially did and learns from where we went wrong in Victoria. Its not a contest we just dont want to see NSW suffer like we did in Victoria and keep their fatalities to a minimum. Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 07-11-2021 (07-11-2021, 05:11 AM)flyboy77 date Wrote:Some more cherry picking from the UK:Didn't you tell us Delta variant isn't worth worrying about because it's less lethal? Could it be your ignoring the increased virulence and choosing the bits and pieces of figures you want to support your argument. Weren't you arguing the lower fatality of Delta variant meant we could open up, and now you're posting something that tells us it kills more even when they are vaccinated? Or perhaps I should I just highlight the rather dogdy nature of the linked image as shown below; - I didn't know report was spelt with double "P", as in Repport No.8, I'll correct that for the future. - Report No.8 was published in Dec 2020, are they predicting the future and quoting figures for future document dates. This seems to be confirmed by the link at the bottom of the image, yet the 3rd line of the charts suggests otherwise, 09/07/2021, innocent mistake or something else? Figures stripped from various different locations and misused to paint a picture for political purposes I suspect. Looks genuine at first, but is patently a fabrication with just the smallest amount of cross checking exposing the truth about it! The Brits always get their spelling wrong in official docs, and publish a link to current data with a date 8 months in the past. : ![]() We understand the pain people suffer, we get that the lockdowns are hurting and the concept of vaccination is scary, we feel sorry for people in this situation on all counts, but sources wilfully lying about or ignoring obvious errors doesn't make things right. It's absurd to claim or assert the government officials and politicians will stand up in the media and report the exact opposite of what their official reports have published in hard copy. It's career ending behaviour, and It doesn't happen. Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - PaulP - 07-11-2021 There aren't any significant policy or leadership differences between NSW and Victoria. They both used hotels for quarantine, they both used private security firms to monitor those hotels. It could have gone t1ts up just as easily in NSW. Most of the Victorian deaths are still aged care related. Dan at the very least tried to be proactive, and get on the front foot to tackle it head on, rather than the wait-and-see approach in NSW. At any rate, covid is far from over, and in the final analysis it could look very different to what it does now. Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - capcom - 07-11-2021 And outright LIED about the offer of the ADF. Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Mav - 07-11-2021 (07-11-2021, 01:54 AM)madbluboy link Wrote:Unfortunately you'll need hundreds of people to die to win this argument, hope that doesn't happen and I hope you don't either. We know Mav is barracking hard.Said like someone who believes in magical thinking. Unfortunately, magical thinking counts for diddly-squat. Covid will do whatever it does. If it kills people, it won’t have anything to do with me. And Gladys’ magical thinking won’t protect us any more than Trump’s confident assertions that cases would go down to nothing and Covid would just disappear one day. |