![]() |
|
CV and mad panic behaviour - Printable Version +- Carlton Supporters Club (http://new.carltonsc.com) +-- Forum: Social Club (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-6.html) +--- Forum: Blah-Blah Bar (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-23.html) +--- Thread: CV and mad panic behaviour (/thread-4651.html) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
|
Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 07-01-2021 Social media and media carry on about the risk of dying directly from an adverse reaction to a vaccination. I came across an interesting stat today. If you give one million people injections between 200 and 500 people get a staphylococcus infection, about 10% of those getting infections are then at risk of dying. The figures are similar for sepsis, but statistically I do not know how they combine, and it won't be simple addition. Interestingly, the stat doesn't change even if you inject nothing at all, if it's just a needle stick injury with no substance issued, it's a bit like the old rose thorn story! Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - capcom - 07-01-2021 The UK deaths continue but nowhere close to the numbers where they were 6 / 9 months back. They've done a great job. Similar to some European countries (Italy / France / Germany) into bringing the numbers down. Poland were a major exception but even they seem to be on top of it now. Pretty damned resilient. I never look at simply Terra Australis. I look at the world. Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 07-01-2021 (07-01-2021, 01:41 AM)capcom date Wrote:The UK deaths continue but nowhere close to the numbers where they were 6 / 9 months back.Not many COVID-19 deaths coming from vaccinated individuals over the last few months, just a handful that in number which falls within the efficacy claims. The vaccines help many, but they won't help everyone! Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Thryleon - 07-01-2021 I know that the data is the data, but the data is somewhat detached from the human experience and we can lose sight of the forest from the trees. I just got told a story, about a mum aged 40 who had a severe reaction to AZ, where she was on an induced coma in ICU for 3 weeks as a result to bleeding on the brain. She is a damned if you do and damned if you don't story as she is also a thyroid cancer sufferer which would make her a high risk to COVID as well. Thing is, 40 year old, 2 daughters, and is now going to spend the better part of the next 12 months learning to walk, talk and feed herself. This is the human side to this snakes and ladders coin flip stuff about vaccines, and rightly or wrongly (correlation vs causation is not mine to judge) but 10 days out from the AZ vaccine with constant headaches is a tell that maybe the two are linked, but that's not my expert judgement, nor the point of this post. Her name is Alyssa. Her story has been published to a facebook page called Verde Baby. If its not a true story, then its despicable. If it is a true story, then it goes back to why some healthy skepticism isn't a problem, and why perhaps when we post on social media about data, numbers, strategy and what not, it all gets a bit lost in the story of the right thing is not necessarily the right thing for everyone. IF AZ is capable of doing this to a 40 year old then we need to rethink the strategy. Sure some people are going to say its 1 in how many, but thats one too many via a deliberate strategy for mine. The risk profile cant be that high, and imagine this lady doesnt pull through, and then her daughters are left without a mother? COVID may not have actually done that to her (it might have but we cant know any different now). Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - sandsmere - 07-01-2021 (07-01-2021, 02:00 AM)Thryleon link Wrote:I know that the data is the data, but the data is somewhat detached from the human experience and we can lose sight of the forest from the trees. Very sad story regarding that lady Thry. I am due to have the second jab next Tuesday. I saw my GP last week and asked him some questions about vaccine ( astra zenica ). He asked me if I drove a car. I said yes and he said that every time I use the car I am around 3000 times more likely to have a driving accident than I am having a problem with AZ. Interisting . Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Mav - 07-01-2021 Thryleon, watch out for Facebook and other Social Media “news”. There was a doco about the anti-vaxxers on SBS last night. That detailed how they co-opted he death of a baby to promote their industry. The mother had been sleeping with the baby regularly until she noted it had stopped breathing. Obviously, it would have been tough for the mother to accept a conclusion that her baby had died of SIDS related to co-sleeping. But the anti-vaxxers rode to her rescue, saying the MMR vaccine caused her baby’s death. The mother found solace in her baby becoming the poster child for the anti-vaxxer movement/industry. Anti-vaxxers are dab hands at using Facebook to run scare campaigns. Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Mav - 07-01-2021 Here’s an article about such campaigns: How anti-vaxxers target grieving moms and turn them into crusaders against vaccines, NBC. Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 07-01-2021 (07-01-2021, 02:00 AM)Thryleon date Wrote:IF AZ is capable of doing this to a 40 year old then we need to rethink the strategy.Is it though, or is the main problem taking a social media post on face value? Not wanting to diminish real world side-effects, it seems somewhat arbitrary how they are allocated and goes along political lines as some suggest, the biggest tell is the absence of claims from certain segments which the statistics suggest are equal, some are just not covered by the media / social media. In the USA under the VAERS system, they uncovered a bunch of infant deaths attributed to Sars-CoV-2 vaccinations, of course infants do not get such vaccinations but that is the problem with voluntary reporting, it's hijacked by bogus content just like social media. These reports are analogous to claiming 5G killed my baby, and in effect they are either a prelude to a spurious compensation claim or the sign of a significantly damaged psyche. Some humans are just awful awful entities whether it is deliberate or accidental! The Australian numbers for vaccinations of AZ are as follows, as reported by the head of the AMA; Quote:Australian Medical Association President Dr Omar Khorshid said AstraZeneca was a safe vaccine.So in Australia it's 0.5 deaths per million from attributable vaccine side-effects, even better than the UK! Social media hysteria put into overdrive by a tricky and selective reporting from the professional media. Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Thryleon - 07-01-2021 (07-01-2021, 02:32 AM)Mav link Wrote:Thryleon, watch out for Facebook and other Social Media “news”. There was a doco about the anti-vaxxers on SBS last night. That detailed how they co-opted he death of a baby to promote their industry. The mother had been sleeping with the baby regularly until she noted it had stopped breathing. Obviously, it would have been tough for the mother to accept a conclusion that her baby had died of SIDS related to co-sleeping. But the anti-vaxxers rode to her rescue, saying the MMR vaccine caused her baby’s death. The mother found solace in her baby becoming the poster child for the anti-vaxxer movement/industry. When they specifically state northern NSW, John Hunter Hospital, and then post the story about part 1 and 2 on facebook of what happens to Alyssa, I am likely to believe the story. This wasnt a click bait story. A friend from high school whom I know personally shared this account, and knows this person through small business largely conducted online. I am posting this, because like LP is stating about numbers, the statistics show that SOMEONE eventually is a statistic, and that even though the statistic hasn't shown a death, given this lady is a cancer sufferer, will it even show a reaction? Data is data. "It doesnt lie" but people can paint whatever story they wish, if the agenda is great enough (such as an Australian Government that has sunk a lot of money in AZ and opted against something different). If this were a story from the United States, I would be more inclined to simply ignore the story but generally in Australia, this is unusual to see. Sure, it might be "sponsored" and the timing is significant (NSW going into lockdown as recently as last week and a likely surge in vaccinations) but Im not here to make a judgement about that. Most of the voices against COVID state that the numbers and data show (same logic applied differently) that Covid only kills the old and the vulnerable. The Vaccine seems similarly poised to only have an adverse reaction to the vulnerable, and the majority will be fine. (Note same logic and that irony is not lost on me). The main difference between them is that one is a deliberate administration. Covid might not infect everyone. The Vaccine if administered will cause this reaction. The numbers ignore this fact. Its a qualifying statement that is uncomfortable. Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Thryleon - 07-01-2021 (07-01-2021, 03:00 AM)LP link Wrote:Is it though, or is the main problem taking a social media post on face value? Possibly true. I am not the sole source of knowledge on all things Vaccines, and dont pretend to be. The hardest part, is pulling apart the various half truths, mis truths and qualifiying arguments to use the statistics. Like you said the raw data doesnt lie, but if recorded differently, it can tell a different story. |