Carlton Supporters Club
CV and mad panic behaviour - Printable Version

+- Carlton Supporters Club (http://new.carltonsc.com)
+-- Forum: Social Club (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-6.html)
+--- Forum: Blah-Blah Bar (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-23.html)
+--- Thread: CV and mad panic behaviour (/thread-4651.html)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743


Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 07-01-2021

Social media and media carry on about the risk of dying directly from an adverse reaction to a vaccination.

I came across an interesting stat today. If you give one million people injections between 200 and 500 people get a staphylococcus infection, about 10% of those getting infections are then at risk of dying. The figures are similar for sepsis, but statistically I do not know how they combine, and it won't be simple addition. Interestingly, the stat doesn't change even if you inject nothing at all, if it's just a needle stick  injury with no substance issued, it's a bit like the old rose thorn story!


Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - capcom - 07-01-2021

The UK deaths continue but nowhere close to the numbers where they were 6 / 9 months back.

They've done a great job.  Similar to some European countries (Italy / France / Germany)
into bringing the numbers down.

Poland were a major exception but even they seem to be on top of it now. 

Pretty damned resilient.  I never look at simply Terra Australis.  I look at the world. 


Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 07-01-2021

(07-01-2021, 01:41 AM)capcom date Wrote:The UK deaths continue but nowhere close to the numbers where they were 6 / 9 months back.
Not many COVID-19 deaths coming from vaccinated individuals over the last few months, just a handful that in number which falls within the efficacy claims. The vaccines help many, but they won't help everyone!


Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Thryleon - 07-01-2021

I know that the data is the data, but the data is somewhat detached from the human experience and we can lose sight of the forest from the trees.

I just got told a story, about a mum aged 40 who had a severe reaction to AZ, where she was on an induced coma in ICU for 3 weeks as a result to bleeding on the brain. 

She is a damned if you do and damned if you don't story as she is also a thyroid cancer sufferer which would make her a high risk to COVID as well.

Thing is, 40 year old, 2 daughters, and is now going to spend the better part of the next 12 months learning to walk, talk and feed herself.

This is the human side to this snakes and ladders coin flip stuff about vaccines, and rightly or wrongly (correlation vs causation is not mine to judge) but 10 days out from the AZ vaccine with constant headaches is a tell that maybe the two are linked, but that's not my expert judgement, nor the point of this post.

Her name is Alyssa.  Her story has been published to a facebook page called Verde Baby.  If its not a true story, then its despicable.  If it is a true story, then it goes back to why some healthy skepticism isn't a problem, and why perhaps when we post on social media about data, numbers, strategy and what not, it all gets a bit lost in the story of the right thing is not necessarily the right thing for everyone.

IF AZ is capable of doing this to a 40 year old then we need to rethink the strategy.  Sure some people are going to say its 1 in how many, but thats one too many via a deliberate strategy for mine.  The risk profile cant be that high, and imagine this lady doesnt pull through, and then her daughters are left without a mother?  COVID may not have actually done that to her (it might have but we cant know any different now).


Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - sandsmere - 07-01-2021

(07-01-2021, 02:00 AM)Thryleon link Wrote:I know that the data is the data, but the data is somewhat detached from the human experience and we can lose sight of the forest from the trees.

I just got told a story, about a mum aged 40 who had a severe reaction to AZ, where she was on an induced coma in ICU for 3 weeks as a result to bleeding on the brain. 

She is a damned if you do and damned if you don't story as she is also a thyroid cancer sufferer which would make her a high risk to COVID as well.

Thing is, 40 year old, 2 daughters, and is now going to spend the better part of the next 12 months learning to walk, talk and feed herself.

This is the human side to this snakes and ladders coin flip stuff about vaccines, and rightly or wrongly (correlation vs causation is not mine to judge) but 10 days out from the AZ vaccine with constant headaches is a tell that maybe the two are linked, but that's not my expert judgement, nor the point of this post.

Her name is Alyssa.  Her story has been published to a facebook page called Verde Baby.  If its not a true story, then its despicable.  If it is a true story, then it goes back to why some healthy skepticism isn't a problem, and why perhaps when we post on social media about data, numbers, strategy and what not, it all gets a bit lost in the story of the right thing is not necessarily the right thing for everyone.

IF AZ is capable of doing this to a 40 year old then we need to rethink the strategy.  Sure some people are going to say its 1 in how many, but thats one too many via a deliberate strategy for mine.  The risk profile cant be that high, and imagine this lady doesnt pull through, and then her daughters are left without a mother?  COVID may not have actually done that to her (it might have but we cant know any different now).

Very sad story regarding that lady Thry.

I am due to have the second jab next Tuesday.
I saw my GP last week and asked him some questions about vaccine ( astra zenica ).
He asked me if I drove a car. I said yes and he said that every time I use the car I am around 3000 times more likely to
have a driving accident  than I am having a problem with AZ.

Interisting .


Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Mav - 07-01-2021

Thryleon, watch out for Facebook and other Social Media “news”. There was a doco about the anti-vaxxers on SBS last night. That detailed how they co-opted he death of a baby to promote their industry. The mother had been sleeping with the baby regularly until she noted it had stopped breathing. Obviously, it would have been tough for the mother to accept a conclusion that her baby had died of SIDS related to co-sleeping. But the anti-vaxxers rode to her rescue, saying the MMR vaccine caused her baby’s death. The mother found solace in her baby becoming the poster child for the anti-vaxxer movement/industry.

Anti-vaxxers are dab hands at using Facebook to run scare campaigns.


Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Mav - 07-01-2021

Here’s an article about such campaigns:
How anti-vaxxers target grieving moms and turn them into crusaders against vaccines, NBC.


Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 07-01-2021

(07-01-2021, 02:00 AM)Thryleon date Wrote:IF AZ is capable of doing this to a 40 year old then we need to rethink the strategy.
Is it though, or is the main problem taking a social media post on face value?

Not wanting to diminish real world side-effects, it seems somewhat arbitrary how they are allocated and goes along political lines as some suggest, the biggest tell is the absence of claims from certain segments which the statistics suggest are equal, some are just not covered by the media / social media.

In the USA under the VAERS system, they uncovered a bunch of infant deaths attributed to Sars-CoV-2 vaccinations, of course infants do not get such vaccinations but that is the problem with voluntary reporting, it's hijacked by bogus content just like social media. These reports are analogous to claiming 5G killed my baby, and in effect they are either a prelude to a spurious compensation claim or the sign of a significantly damaged psyche.

Some humans are just awful awful entities whether it is deliberate or accidental!

The Australian numbers for vaccinations of AZ are as follows, as reported by the head of the AMA;
Quote:Australian Medical Association President Dr Omar Khorshid said AstraZeneca was a safe vaccine.

“No scientists that I’ve heard has said that AstraZeneca is a dangerous vaccine, because, yes, there are serious risks, but they’re one in 40,000. And the death rate [from clotting] in Australia is less than one in two million,” he said.

“The reason [ATAGI changed the advice] is because the benefit side of the equation changes. This idea that there’s so much more risk in vaccinating young people is just not true.”
So in Australia it's 0.5 deaths per million from attributable vaccine side-effects, even better than the UK!

Social media hysteria put into overdrive by a tricky and selective reporting from the professional media.



Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Thryleon - 07-01-2021

(07-01-2021, 02:32 AM)Mav link Wrote:Thryleon, watch out for Facebook and other Social Media “news”. There was a doco about the anti-vaxxers on SBS last night. That detailed how they co-opted he death of a baby to promote their industry. The mother had been sleeping with the baby regularly until she noted it had stopped breathing. Obviously, it would have been tough for the mother to accept a conclusion that her baby had died of SIDS related to co-sleeping. But the anti-vaxxers rode to her rescue, saying the MMR vaccine caused her baby’s death. The mother found solace in her baby becoming the poster child for the anti-vaxxer movement/industry.

Anti-vaxxers are dab hands at using Facebook to run scare campaigns.

When they specifically state northern NSW, John Hunter Hospital, and then post the story about part 1 and 2 on facebook of what happens to Alyssa, I am likely to believe the story.  This wasnt a click bait story.  A friend from high school whom I know personally shared this account, and knows this person through small business largely conducted online.

I am posting this, because like LP is stating about numbers, the statistics show that SOMEONE eventually is a statistic, and that even though the statistic hasn't shown a death, given this lady is a cancer sufferer, will it even show a reaction?  Data is data.  "It doesnt lie" but people can paint whatever story they wish, if the agenda is great enough (such as an Australian Government that has sunk a lot of money in AZ and opted against something different).

If this were a story from the United States, I would be more inclined to simply ignore the story but generally in Australia, this is unusual to see.  Sure, it might be "sponsored" and the timing is significant (NSW going into lockdown as recently as last week and a likely surge in vaccinations) but Im not here to make a judgement about that.

Most of the voices against COVID state that the numbers and data show (same logic applied differently) that Covid only kills the old and the vulnerable.  The Vaccine seems similarly poised to only have an adverse reaction to the vulnerable, and the majority will be fine.  (Note same logic and that irony is not lost on me).

The main difference between them is that one is a deliberate administration.  Covid might not infect everyone.  The Vaccine if administered will cause this reaction.  The numbers ignore this fact.  Its a qualifying statement that is uncomfortable.



Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Thryleon - 07-01-2021

(07-01-2021, 03:00 AM)LP link Wrote:Is it though, or is the main problem taking a social media post on face value?

Not wanting to diminish real world side-effects, it seems somewhat arbitrary how they are allocated and goes along political lines as some suggest, the biggest tell is the absence of claims from certain segments which the statistics suggest are equal, some are just not covered by the media / social media.

In the USA under the VAERS system, they uncovered a bunch of infant deaths attributed to Sars-CoV-2 vaccinations, of course infants do not get such vaccinations but that is the problem with voluntary reporting, it's hijacked by bogus content just like social media. These reports are analogous to claiming 5G killed my baby, and in effect they are either a prelude to a spurious compensation claim or the sign of a significantly damaged psyche.

Some humans are just awful awful entities whether it is deliberate or accidental!

The Australian numbers for vaccinations of AZ are as follows, as reported by the head of the AMA;So in Australia it's 0.5 deaths per million from attributable vaccine side-effects, even better than the UK!

Social media hysteria put into overdrive by a tricky and selective reporting from the professional media.

Possibly true.

I am not the sole source of knowledge on all things Vaccines, and dont pretend to be.

The hardest part, is pulling apart the various half truths, mis truths and qualifiying arguments to use the statistics.  Like you said the raw data doesnt lie, but if recorded differently, it can tell a different story.