+- Carlton Supporters Club (http://new.carltonsc.com)
+-- Forum: Social Club (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-6.html)
+--- Forum: Blah-Blah Bar (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-23.html)
+--- Thread: CV and mad panic behaviour (/thread-4651.html)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Thryleon - 06-15-2021
(06-15-2021, 06:01 AM)Mav link Wrote:I’m guessing he doesn’t like going to nightclubs ...
Said he had a great time in Camden town a couple of weeks ago.
Live music and nightlife.
Maybe the rules are written but unfollowed... ???
Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Mav - 06-15-2021
There are plenty of people here, no doubt, who don’t seem to be restricted by the current rules.
Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Mav - 06-15-2021
Hmmm ... looks like the Hotel Quarantine system has stuffed up again. But this time it was in NSW. Seems Covid jumped between 3 returned travellers. As we know from the SA breach, if someone is infected at the end of their quarantine period, Covid hitches a ride out of Hotel quarantine. This is not a system that is fit for purpose.
Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - ElwoodBlues1 - 06-15-2021
No return travellers then no problems..
Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Gointocarlton - 06-16-2021
(06-15-2021, 02:15 PM)ElwoodBlues1 link Wrote:No return travellers then no problems..Should have started building a purpose designed facilities in April last year. The money this rubbish has cost the governments they could have built 10 facilities. Experts (I personally know one expert in containment facilities) wrote to the Governments in March last year telling them hotels would not cut it and why. They were ignored in typical government bureaucratic fashion until only recently, too late. You pissed 8-10 valuable months up against the wall. We have so many extremely smart, talented people, world leaders in the field, in this country and yet we are so dumb. I have collaborated with people in other countries in design of various types of facilities in the Pharma space and I can tell you from experience, our engineers and architects run rings around their overseas counterparts. So frustrating.
Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Mav - 06-16-2021
Yep. Elimination just bought us time to build fit-for-purpose facilities and conduct a speedy vaccine rollout. But I guess instead it fed a fingers-crossed approach in the hope they could save a few dollars on those 2 priorities.
Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Thryleon - 06-16-2021
Don't get started on qr codes and contact tracing. It took 12 months to get a decent system for checking in everywhere using the Victoria app whilst an over complicated and engineered Bluetooth app took precedence.
Our governments obsession with making all our decisions for us is stupid when they can't make any of their own.
Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - flyboy77 - 06-16-2021
For any who are serious about this virus thing.
3 hours, but a truly exceptional listen/watch to three very bright dudes.
Of course LP will know better, even better than the inventor of the mRNA mechanism, but that's ok, we should all bow in the presence of greatness.,
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-_NNTVJzqtY
Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 06-16-2021
(06-16-2021, 01:08 PM)flyboy77 date Wrote:Of course LP will know better, even better than the inventor of the mRNA mechanism, but that's ok, we should all bow in the presence of greatness.,Your willingness to misrepresent the position of Dr Robert Malone by association with Kirsch and Weinstein exposes your willingness to deceive in this debate.
For those interested but haven't time to listen to the full debate, this was a "What if" COVID can be driven to extinction, based on Weinstein's premise that Ivermectin is safe, cheap and effective.
Firstly, even in the debate they refer to Ivermectin use as part of a complimentary drug regime, not in isolation. Secondly, in the regime Weinstein profligates, the cost of Ivermectin is 500% more than the vaccines and must be ongoing on an annual basis, even without the cost$ of the complimentary drugs required. Like Remdesivir, some but not all of the complimentary drugs are hundreds or thousands of dollars per dose. You can hear this at about the 1:49 min mark.
Secondly, the very concept of the debate, extinction of Sars-CoV-2 is laughable. Dr Malone doesn't describe to that, it's a fairy tale scenario, and Kirsch and Weinstein basically talk over him to shut that point down. Sars-CoV-2 is endemic, that means it in the environment not just humans, you can't just treat humans and make it extinct, because for example it is in birds, bats, cats, dogs and any other number of viral vectors.
Weinstein keeps referring to all the anti-viral alternatives as "cheap and safe" ignoring that most aren't cheap at all, and not necessarily safe either. For example he talks about the complimentary use of Ivermectin and Fluvoxamine in one moment, then later warns of the Fluvoxamine cognitive side-effects, while Kirsch argues for Fluvoxamine use in children while claiming it's safe over a 14 day treatment period, yet 14 days won't get the extinction job done. The safety of these drugs is based on the concept they are administered to a small portion of the population(patients), and so the side-effect risk is low, but in the prophylactic regime that Weinstein promotes it is required to issue them to billions of healthy people on an ongoing basis.
Kirsch is correct in one point, Sars-CoV-2 is so complex there is no one correct safe solution, but Ivermectin boosters can't use Kirsch's arguments as support because he states multiple times in this debate that Ivermectin as anti-viral is of minimal benefit.
Weinstein always refers to Ivermectin's use in some kind of reasonable combination, without discussing the combination $ or the side-effects of those combinations! Some of the combinations Weinstein discusses will result in ongoing cost$ 1000% higher than the cost of the vaccines, some with serious well known long term side-effects if used long term which are far worse than the vaccine side-effects.
When the large scale studies become available, due in the 4th Qtr of this year, the outcome will be of interest to everyone, but until that data is available it's a coin toss if any of these drugs have any real benefit.
Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Baggers - 06-16-2021
Firstly, thank you again to PAULY, for introducing me to 'The Conversation.' Such a high level of journalism.
This article today I, personally, found really helpful among a plethora of confusing and misinformation.
https://theconversation.com/which-covid-vaccine-is-best-heres-why-thats-really-hard-to-answer-161185?utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Latest%20from%20The%20Conversation%20for%20June%2017%202021%20-%201976519392&utm_content=Latest%20from%20The%20Conversation%20for%20June%2017%202021%20-%201976519392+CID_756b5685e4ba2ca8200e9e5b2191cd2d&utm_source=campaign_monitor&utm_term=Which%20COVID%20vaccine%20is%20best%20Heres%20why%20thats%20really%20hard%20to%20answer