Carlton Supporters Club
CV and mad panic behaviour - Printable Version

+- Carlton Supporters Club (http://new.carltonsc.com)
+-- Forum: Social Club (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-6.html)
+--- Forum: Blah-Blah Bar (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-23.html)
+--- Thread: CV and mad panic behaviour (/thread-4651.html)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743


Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 06-08-2021

(06-08-2021, 01:54 AM)ElwoodBlues1 date Wrote:All I know is that it's just normal business in those areas, lockdown always reduces road and workplace accidents as you would expect.
Re: Contact tracing... NSW use trained health care staff to supervise and conduct strategy with most of their tracing teams.As you would expect when there is a measles outbreak those cases are traced and hence you need a level of health care experience when questioning and asking about symptoms etc. NSW have resourced these areas better and hence have the better system.
Victoria cut funding a while back and don't have enough trained health care staff.When the pandemic hit we were under manned and couldn't cope,paying peanuts means monkeys and the Vic Government have dropped the ball on contact tracing with its under resourcing.
Yes, but how does this affect the current situation?

We had a quarantine leak in SA that put the boots into Victoria, with a delivery driver spending 12 days traipsing around Metro-Melbourne and some Vic regional areas while infectious. He could have come from NSW, WA, Qld, the origin is irrelevant, and the 12 days before tracing started was critical.

But how do you trace and track before the event, the only way to do that is with a check-in compliant public and here in Vic we do not have that, we have dissenters instead and those targeting compliant small business owners with social media vitriol. ............. We are Victoria!


Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Thryleon - 06-08-2021

(06-08-2021, 12:22 AM)LP link Wrote:[member=105]Thryleon[/member]‍ isn't that a confusion of cause and effect, the observation must fit the order of real world events?

I hear a lot of people hurting, but it's not easy to say who must pay the price for this, who volunteers, it seems 'the they' always want to blame the other.

But just as "We are Carlton", ............... "We are Melbourne" and "We are Australia", our current circumstance is a compounding of Federal, State and Social issues.

I know what you are saying, but follow the below logic:



IF this virus is the threat it is.

AND we have a lot of people being not compliant with masks, gathering in spite of lockdowns, no check ins at contact tracing etc.

THEN we should have a bunch of cases that are unaccounted for in contact tracing, and a lot more COVID around in the case of a pandemic and an infectious disease (although this can be explained away by people not being tested). 

THEREFORE - Its only a matter of time until a phantom case tests positive ADMITTED IN HOSPITAL because they have contracted COVID and got sick.


IF they aren't sick, and they are positive, and they don't spread this to anyone that ends up sick or in hospital is this threat worth worrying about really?

They are all valid observations, that seem to just be ignored for the most part.

The bit I have bolded here is the one that is a real head scratcher to me. 


Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 06-08-2021

(06-08-2021, 03:04 AM)Thryleon date Wrote:I know what you are saying, but follow the below logic:

IF this virus is the threat it is.

AND we have a lot of people being not compliant with masks, gathering in spite of lockdowns, no check ins at contact tracing etc.

THEN we should have a bunch of cases that are unaccounted for in contact tracing, and a lot more COVID around in the case of a pandemic and an infectious disease (although this can be explained away by people not being tested). 

THEREFORE - Its only a matter of time until a phantom case tests positive ADMITTED IN HOSPITAL because they have contracted COVID and got sick.


IF they aren't sick, and they are positive, and they don't spread this to anyone that ends up sick or in hospital is this threat worth worrying about really?

They are all valid observations, that seem to just be ignored for the most part.

The bit I have bolded here is the one that is a real head scratcher to me.
I'm not sure it is quite valid, I think the part missing from that logic is the delay between being exposed and becoming infectious, an infected person is not instantaneously infectious.

The purpose of contract tracing to isolate individuals before they become infectious, this time around that seems to be working not failing as some claim. And we have cases of community transmission traced and confirmed. Unaccounted for cases could well be a failing of contract tracing, or deliberate non-compliance, not necessarily related to the original source or method of transmission.

I see this as a different debate to discussing lockdown. Lockdown is more about compliance and societal behaviour, once cases are identified and isolated if the public was truly complaint we might not need lockdown at all. In that regard purpose of lockdown is to limit the rate of spread so that contract tracing has time to do it's work.

Finally, let's not write off the effects of vaccinations and anti-virals, which all combine to deliver a different R[sub]0[/sub]. As that situation improves, it must surely have an impact diminishing the need for lockdown, I'd suggest the surge in vaccinations is a growing public awareness of that fact. The dissenting anti-vaxx movement if followed would result in the exact opposite.


Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Mav - 06-08-2021

The problem is lag time. IIRC, the 60 & 70 year olds did ultimately seek medical assistance, with the latter placed on a ventilator. But they did so reluctantly after battling Covid for close to 2 weeks (and travelling around Melbourne like tourists).


Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Thryleon - 06-08-2021

(06-08-2021, 03:15 AM)LP link Wrote:I'm not sure it is quite valid, I think the part missing from that logic is the delay between being exposed and becoming infectious, an infected person is not instantaneously infectious.

The purpose of contract tracing to isolate individuals before they become infectious, this time around that seems to be working not failing as some claim. And we have cases of community transmission traced and confirmed. Unaccounted for cases could well be a failing of contract tracing, or deliberate non-compliance, not necessarily related to the original source or method of transmission.

I see this as a different debate to discussing lockdown. Lockdown is more about compliance and societal behaviour, once cases are identified and isolated if the public was truly complaint we might not need lockdown at all. In that regard purpose of lockdown is to limit the rate of spread so that contract tracing has time to do it's work.

Finally, let's not write off the effects of vaccinations and anti-virals, which all combine to deliver a different R[sub]0[/sub]. As that situation improves, it must surely have an impact diminishing the need for lockdown, I'd suggest the surge in vaccinations is a growing public awareness of that fact. The dissenting anti-vaxx movement if followed would result in the exact opposite.

Dissenters would never get tested though.  They would spread it and it would only become apparent once someone ended up in hospital.

This outcome should have happened already really.




Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 06-08-2021

(06-08-2021, 03:18 AM)Mav date Wrote:The problem is lag time. IIRC, the 60 & 70 year olds did ultimately seek medical assistance, with the latter placed on a ventilator. But they did so reluctantly after battling Covid for close to 2 weeks (and travelling around Melbourne like tourists).
This highlights the problem with early stages of COVID-19 illness, it can present like a benign cold or allergy, and then by the time secondary effects start to kick in and people are forced to present at hospital it can be very very serious indeed, and maybe too late for some!


Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 06-08-2021

(06-08-2021, 03:25 AM)Thryleon date Wrote:Dissenters would never get tested though.  They would spread it and it would only become apparent once someone ended up in hospital.

This outcome should have happened already really.
It did, that is exactly what happened as [member=122]Mav[/member] points out, although in the current case they weren't deliberate dissenters just people oblivious to their illness!

Not wanting to persecute anybody, if they had followed the "Get Tested" mantra, instead of being indifferent, in denial or complacent, we might not be in lockdown now!

An associate pointed out another interesting COVID-19 effect which must have an impact. As a casual inner city observer he's noted from working in a inner city the tendency to avoid people who seem ill or unwell, people who sneeze or cough, they are being given a very wide birth by many, this must have some limiting effect.


Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Thryleon - 06-08-2021

(06-08-2021, 03:26 AM)LP link Wrote:It did Thry, that is exactly what happened!

When?  I missed that part.  Was that last year?  Shouldn't the first sign on news have been a man tests positive in hospital?.


Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 06-08-2021

(06-08-2021, 03:28 AM)Thryleon date Wrote:When?  I missed that part.  Was that last year?  Shouldn't the first sign on news have been a man tests positive in hospital?.
Well historically the very first case as a man returned from Wuhan and presenting as ill before testing positive in Monash Medical Center. Long before Vic was in lockdown, long before the boats or planes came home.

@Mav is talking about this current outbreak.


Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Thryleon - 06-08-2021

[member=153]LP[/member] I am talking now.

If people are thumbing their noses at the outbreak like you asserted earlier, we should see this happening frequently amongst the dissenters to use your own language.