Carlton Supporters Club
AFL Rd 5 2024 Post Game Prognostications Carlton vs Adelaide - Printable Version

+- Carlton Supporters Club (http://new.carltonsc.com)
+-- Forum: Princes Park (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: Robert Heatley Stand (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-14.html)
+--- Thread: AFL Rd 5 2024 Post Game Prognostications Carlton vs Adelaide (/thread-6458.html)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13


Re: AFL Rd 5 2024 Post Game Prognostications Carlton vs Adelaide - Professer E - 04-13-2024

Then drop him.  No passengers.


Re: AFL Rd 5 2024 Post Game Prognostications Carlton vs Adelaide - laj - 04-13-2024

(04-13-2024, 09:45 AM)LP link Wrote:Personally I think Pitto was the better of the two today, TDK was soundly beaten again by O'Brien who seems to be TDK's bogeyman.

I think if we hadn't had Pitto we would have lost by a lot more.

I reckon if we had an extra runner we'd have won. Wouldn't that have been handy late.


Re: AFL Rd 5 2024 Post Game Prognostications Carlton vs Adelaide - laj - 04-13-2024

(04-13-2024, 10:00 AM)Professer E link Wrote:Fantasia gives us nothing.  I know we have injuries to most of our half forwards but why not play a running type like Binns.  It gives us more flexibility.

Fantasia is supposed to be a specialist small forward.  Why isn't he applying pressure?  Why he is nowhere to be seen when the ball hits the deck?

Thinking he is still getting the feel of the game after a long time out. Think he will be good for us, just not now. I think he needs to find that touch in the twos.


Re: AFL Rd 5 2024 Post Game Prognostications Carlton vs Adelaide - IvanAwfulbigone - 04-13-2024

Everything about that loss was nauseating. From the predictability of it all, to the haircuts on the Adelaide players, to the unbridled joy in the Foxtel commentary box.


Re: AFL Rd 5 2024 Post Game Prognostications Carlton vs Adelaide - ElwoodBlues1 - 04-13-2024

Crows wanted it a bit more when it mattered and their kids stood up and they did the one per centers well.
We lacked run at the end and that scruffy dude Berry with his scruffy mate Soligo just had more run in the legs.
Cerra was a big loss for us and the Pitto/TDK twin ruck approach was ineffective. Harry and Charlie looked good at times but failed to dominate against what would would have to be the worst KP defenders in the comp in Butts and Keane.
Walker and Keays messed with us as usual and  the Crows are officially now our monkey team who we can't get off our backs. Good teams rebound so I expect more effort vs GWS and a few changes in both teams due to injuries.



Re: AFL Rd 5 2024 Post Game Prognostications Carlton vs Adelaide - Professer E - 04-13-2024

Important players are hurt EB, not confident taking on GWS


Re: AFL Rd 5 2024 Post Game Prognostications Carlton vs Adelaide - Baggers - 04-13-2024

(04-13-2024, 09:45 AM)LP link Wrote:Personally I think Pitto was the better of the two today, TDK was soundly beaten again by O'Brien who seems to be TDK's bogeyman.

I think if we hadn't had Pitto we would have lost by a lot more.

If we hadn't had Pitto, we would have had Cerra.


Re: AFL Rd 5 2024 Post Game Prognostications Carlton vs Adelaide - ElwoodBlues1 - 04-13-2024

(04-13-2024, 10:14 AM)Professer E link Wrote:Important players are hurt EB, not confident taking on GWS
Prof, Watched GWS play Stkilda and they just fell in with injuries to key players in Taylor and Coniglio so Im hoping their injuries balance up ours. Given the game is at Marvel I think we will rebound ok but if it had been at their home ground/s then I wouldnt be so confident.

   


Re: AFL Rd 5 2024 Post Game Prognostications Carlton vs Adelaide - Professer E - 04-13-2024

We need to start winning clearances, our small forwards are average and I've no confidence in our small defenders with Saad missing


Re: AFL Rd 5 2024 Post Game Prognostications Carlton vs Adelaide - pinot - 04-13-2024

Lacked run in the end - playing two rucks not suiting the demands of system as need more runners up and down the ground. The amount of marks we gave up in our D50 due to lack of pressure or covering was comical. Lost it on selection table.