![]() |
|
Tokyo 2021 - Printable Version +- Carlton Supporters Club (http://new.carltonsc.com) +-- Forum: Social Club (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-6.html) +--- Forum: Blah-Blah Bar (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-23.html) +--- Thread: Tokyo 2021 (/thread-5247.html) |
Re: Tokyo 2021 - Thryleon - 06-05-2021 (06-05-2021, 02:37 AM)Mav link Wrote:Have you read the article footnoted in the Wikipedia page? If you do, you’ll see it doesn’t help to tie the AFL to C7.yeah no thanks. The point being that you asserted something against soccer and have been caught out with the inverse being true. I expect no support on an AFL football forum for any of this and your version of events is a patchwork of absolution that doesn't fit. The media coverage wasn't there and the game going from sbs to c7 sports relegated Australian footage to Wednesday nights at midnight. Midnight!! Exactly like I told you. This isn't creative history. You won't find an accurate recount of events that caused the issues from tart to finish. The fact that back in the 90's the game was regarded as one that was for Sheila's wogs, and poofters tells the story better than one written with the switch to the A league front and centre of its revisionist approach to what happened. Find the fans and they'll tell you the story. Re: Tokyo 2021 - Mav - 06-05-2021 I don’t accept conspiracy theories as truth. That you and others do is disappointing but given Trump’s ability to take such theories to a new level, that’s the least of my concerns. Re: Tokyo 2021 - Thryleon - 06-05-2021 (06-05-2021, 05:29 AM)Mav link Wrote:I don’t accept conspiracy theories as truth. That you and others do is disappointing but given Trump’s ability to take such theories to a new level, that’s the least of my concerns. Conspiracy theories.... like the world game bullying afl for the world cup? Where's your proof? Slinging mud. Hypocrisies. You're worse than a Trump. Re: Tokyo 2021 - Mav - 06-05-2021 Fact. The contractual conditions banning domestic sports being played were made public (leaving aside the fact that Australia’s bid pretty much commandeered all AFL venues, making it hard to play games even in the absence of those provisions). Which, getting back to the topic at long last, emphasises the invasive nature of the contracts host cities (or countries in the case of World Cup contracts) sign. To protect major sponsors, the IOC insists the host city bans visible advertising from sponsors’ competitors. Competing events are banned. Host cities are required to prohibit or severely restrict any use of public and private transport systems that might impact upon movement of Olympic spectators and dignitaries. The contracts would kill you if they fell on your head: they’re that thick. Just about everything conceivable is in there. And that’s not even including the fringe benefits to IOC committee members. Re: Tokyo 2021 - capcom - 06-05-2021 You'd be floored by what SOCOG put on the table for the 2000 Olympic Torch Relay. The sheer arrogance of nobodies throwing their weight around. |