![]() |
|
Goaltracker 2019 - Printable Version +- Carlton Supporters Club (http://new.carltonsc.com) +-- Forum: Princes Park (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-4.html) +--- Forum: Robert Heatley Stand (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-14.html) +--- Thread: Goaltracker 2019 (/thread-4198.html) |
Re: Goaltracker 2019 - Lods - 04-22-2019 (04-22-2019, 03:15 AM)spf link Wrote:Are we still doing the Goal tracker? We are...its completed up to round 4 I'll do this weeks in the next day or two I suspect (know) we're now ahead of last year for points for and I know for sure our percentage is much better after Round 5 Re: Goaltracker 2019 - Lods - 04-22-2019 After Round 5 2017 Goals-48 Behinds-51 Percentage 67.1% (For- 339, Against- 505) 2018 Goals-49 Behinds -43 Percentage 65.2 % (For- 337, Against- 517) 2019 (Target 2018-Goals 192- Behinds 201- For 1353) Goals-53 Behinds 50 Percentage 93.4% (For 368 Against 394) Goalkickers (Target 2018- Charlie Curnow 34-20 -224) 2017 Casboult 9 Silvagni 6 Wright 6 2018 Curnow 9 Wright 8 Casboult 7 Garlett 5 McKay 4 Fisher- 4 2019 McKay 9 McGovern 8 E Curnow 5 Fisher 4 Ahead of last year’s goal total at the same stage now Ahead of last year’s percentage to the same period. Defence is maintaining its strong effort well up on points against last year Harry leading the goalkicking, but has been a bit inaccurate...9-8-62 for the season McGovern second with 8-3 -51 Re: Goaltracker 2019 - flyboy77 - 04-22-2019 On those numbers, we're conceding 4 goals a game less every game, on average. That's impressive - and puts us in many games (as we have been) that previously we would have been out of.... Re: Goaltracker 2019 - jeza - 04-22-2019 If you ignore everything else and just look at the percentage we've made significant progress this season. Re: Goaltracker 2019 - Lods - 04-22-2019 (04-22-2019, 10:43 PM)jeza link Wrote:If you ignore everything else and just look at the percentage we've made significant progress this season. As I mentioned in another thread, at the start of the season the percentage can fluctuate dramatically due to the fact you're dealing with small numbers in the for and against columns. A 50 point win or loss in round 5 will impact your percentage much more than a 50 point win/loss will in round 20. We jumped more than 10 percentage point off the back of a good win. It also helps us that most of our games have been low scoring affairs from both sides. But yep...it's better to have it moving in a positive direction Re: Goaltracker 2019 - Lods - 04-22-2019 (04-22-2019, 10:32 PM)flyboy77 link Wrote:On those numbers, we're conceding 4 goals a game less every game, on average. It is the most impressive part of our season so far... We're 9th best in terms of points scored against us at the moment. This time last year we were 17th Re: Goaltracker 2019 - jeza - 04-23-2019 (04-22-2019, 10:52 PM)Lods link Wrote:As I mentioned in another thread, at the start of the season the percentage can fluctuate dramatically due to the fact you're dealing with small numbers in the for and against columns. Of course but last year that game in PA for example would have been a 50+ point loss almost guaranteed. I think 5 rounds is a fair sample size. Nearly a quarter of the season. So good progress so far and hoping for a 14 point win this week which if my maths is correct would move us above the dawks on the ladder. Re: Goaltracker 2019 - Professer E - 04-23-2019 That list is deceptive... It's E. Curnow with the goals in 2019, not C. Curnow, which changes the distribution dramatically. Re: Goaltracker 2019 - Lods - 04-23-2019 (04-23-2019, 07:09 AM)Professer E link Wrote:That list is deceptive... It's E. Curnow with the goals in 2019, not C. Curnow, which changes the distribution dramatically. Yep Sorry. I've had to check myself a couple of times this year to make sure I distinguish between the C and the E rather than just putting down Curnow. Fixed. Re: Goaltracker 2019 - kruddler - 04-23-2019 (04-22-2019, 10:52 PM)Lods link Wrote:As I mentioned in another thread, at the start of the season the percentage can fluctuate dramatically due to the fact you're dealing with small numbers in the for and against columns. That works both ways though Lods. ![]() Maybe we beat the hawks by 50 this week. ;D |