Carlton Supporters Club
CV and mad panic behaviour - Printable Version

+- Carlton Supporters Club (http://new.carltonsc.com)
+-- Forum: Social Club (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-6.html)
+--- Forum: Blah-Blah Bar (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-23.html)
+--- Thread: CV and mad panic behaviour (/thread-4651.html)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743


Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - DJC - 06-02-2021

Just to be perfectly clear, the following is copied from the TGA website:

Quote:The TGA uses its adverse event reporting system to closely monitor reports of death following COVID-19 vaccination. During the early stages of the vaccine rollout in Australia and many other countries, deaths were reported following vaccination in older people living in aged care as this is where the vaccine rollout started. Many of these deaths were in frail elderly people and were coincidental with vaccination. This was confirmed following review by the TGA and medicine regulators in the UK, Europe and the US which found no specific safety concerns from use of the vaccines in older people.

However, it is possible in frail older people that even relatively mild and expected adverse reactions following the vaccination may contribute to deterioration of an underlying illness. For this reason, the Product Information documents for both the Pfizer and the AstraZeneca vaccines provide advice about vaccinating frail elderly people (over 85 years old) and warn that the potential benefits of vaccination must be weighed against the potential risks for each individual person.

To 23 May 2021, 3.6 million doses of COVID-19 vaccines have been given in Australia. In this period, the TGA has received 210 reports of deaths following immunisation – 109 have been reported for the Pfizer vaccine, 94 for the AstraZeneca vaccine and seven where the vaccine was not specified. Most of these reports (93%) were for people 65 years of age and over, and over three quarters were 75 years of age and over. Many of the deaths relate to elderly aged-care residents.

The TGA reviews all deaths reported after vaccination and monitors for safety signals. Part of our analysis includes comparing expected natural death rates to observed death rates following immunisation. To date, the observed number of deaths reported after vaccination is actually less than the expected number of deaths.

Each year in Australia, there are about 160,000 deaths, equating to 13,300 a month or 3050 each week. In the most recent reporting year (2018)(link is external) two-thirds of these deaths were in people aged 75 years and over.

Additionally, deaths from COVID-19 disease overwhelmingly occur in the elderly. While the 20-29 age group has had the highest number of cases of COVID-19 in Australia (followed by the 30-39 age group), 94 % (852 of 910) of COVID-19 deaths in Australia(link is external) have been in those aged 70 or over.

Apart from the single Australian case in which death was linked to TTS, COVID-19 vaccines have not been found to cause death. Given the benefits of vaccination with regard to preventing severe disease, hospitalisation and death from COVID-19, particularly in older age groups, immunisation is strongly encouraged as we head into the winter months.

So, it's true that 210 people died after immunisation but 209 of those would have died anyway.  In fact, the number of people who died following immunisation is lower than would be expected from that cohort in the normal course of events.

Another story that caught my eye was Peru revising its COVID death toll from 69,000 to over 180,000 "on the advice of Peruvian and international experts."  The revised COVID death toll now correlates with Peru's excess death figures.


Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 06-02-2021

(06-02-2021, 04:54 AM)DJC date Wrote:So, it's true that 210 people died after immunisation but 209 of those would have died anyway.  In fact, the number of people who died following immunisation is lower than would be expected from that cohort in the normal course of events.
Exactly, ironically it looks like being COVID-19 vaccinated decreases the general death rate.

The reality is that it probably has no effect on the general death rate over the long term, it may change short term behaviour reducing the short term death rate.

My friend who is a retired actuary tells me it's impossible to decode the cause and effect around the general death rate. For example, he said less people driving or travelling to work means less traffic deaths, but more people stay at home and climb ladders!


Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Thryleon - 06-02-2021

(06-02-2021, 02:39 AM)LP link Wrote:There are no "vaccine deaths", there is one single vaccine death, your premise is based on a lie or misdirection about a statistic!

Also, partial inversion of the logic leaves the argument non-sensical.

The fact that 210 people died is real, that they were part of 3.6 million that had been vaccinated is real, the assertion that they died as a result of vaccination is false and does not exist in the reports. In formal logic it's called a false premise, and Trump and his followers have made it an artform.

exactly my point

If you can massage the numbers to prove a point, you can do it on either side of the fence.

Each COVID death that had co morbidity, means that COVID can be interpreted as cause of death, but they would have died anyway (assumption).

Each case would be different, ergo, the same applies to those vaccinated but dead.  Why count that number if its irrelevant?

DJC states the following:

Quote:So, it's true that 210 people died after immunisation but 209 of those would have died anyway.

If that is also true of each COVID death, is COVID the killer virus its made out to be?

Before you answer that question, ask yourself whether or not that question resonates with you in any way shape or form, and also, whether or not that is a healthy question to ask.  You will find, that its actually the most appropriate question to ask, and the answer is hidden in statistics, massaged numbers, vaccinations, and foreign counts of people.  Yet here we are in Australia, with rising case numbers, a new lockdown, and no one going to hospital with COVID.


Why??



Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 06-02-2021

(06-02-2021, 05:04 AM)Thryleon date Wrote:exactly my point

If you can massage the numbers to prove a point, you can do it on either side of the fence.
Only one side of the debate is massaging numbers, the fake news vendors. That is where you go wrong trying to paint it as a level playing field of information. It isn't a level playing field, all the information is not the same quality, in just the same way all opinions are not equal.

The stats and numbers do not lie, they are not subject to human interpretation, influence or obfuscation, they are not like opinions that can be spun bent or twisted to an individuals will!

The emphasis on wanting COVID-19 deaths proven to support or refute the COVID-19 restrictions and other actions is also flawed, it's built on the premise that COVID-19 infections that aren't deadly are somehow OK! The evidence suggests the long term effects of long COVID-19 will potentially be far far costlier than the initial deaths. As abhorrent as it may read, a funeral is far far cheaper than a treatment or long term critical care!


Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 06-02-2021

(06-02-2021, 05:10 AM)ElwoodBlues1 date Wrote:The hospitals are encouraged to not report vaccine problems and find other conditions
to use as the cause of death.
Underlying causes are being used to mask the truth with emphasis on the lying. If you want the true stats speak to the staff not the tga website or the hospital administrators.
The problem statistic for that argument is as [member=324]DJC[/member] points out, total deaths have dropped. That statistic tears the concept you are asserting a new one!


Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - ElwoodBlues1 - 06-02-2021

(06-02-2021, 05:12 AM)LP link Wrote:The problem statistic for that argument is as [member=324]DJC[/member] points out, total deaths have dropped. That statistic tears the concept you are asserting a new one!
Do you think every death is reported...?


Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 06-02-2021

(06-02-2021, 05:14 AM)ElwoodBlues1 date Wrote:Do you think every death is reported...?
If we are talking about here in Australia, yes every death is reported and accounted for.

It regards to the global statistics, it doesn't matter as long as the method of collecting them is consistent then the count remains valid.

You are an engineer, I don't expect we have to debate Regression to the Mean or Standard Deviations, or what they mean to the general trend, or what averages mean to an assertion that some numbers might be missing or that the count was somehow imperfect.


Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Thryleon - 06-02-2021

(06-02-2021, 05:10 AM)LP link Wrote:Only one side of the debate is massaging numbers, the fake news vendors. That is where you go wrong trying to paint it as a level playing field of information. It isn't a level playing field, all the information is not the same quality, in just the same way all opinions are not equal.

The stats and numbers do not lie, they are not subject to human interpretation, influence or obfuscation, they are not like opinions that can be spun bent or twisted to an individuals will!

The emphasis on wanting COVID-19 deaths proven to support or refute the COVID-19 restrictions and other actions is also flawed, it's built on the premise that COVID-19 infections that aren't deadly are somehow OK! The evidence suggests the long term effects of long COVID-19 will potentially be far far costlier than the initial deaths. As abhorrent as it may read, a funeral is far far cheaper than a treatment or long term critical care!

You are asserting something yourself here.

That the statistics gathered are reliable accurate, and not embelished in any way shape or form.  That any potential deaths attributed to vaccinations are not attributed to vaccinations but other causes, and that any one who is listed as a covid death, died because they got covid.

Deliberately muddying long covid into there is a bit false.  The current batch are as asymptomatic as it gets unless they are reporting something I am missing.

You are confusing the data with the interpretation here.  You state the data doesnt lie, but those giving us the statistics are interpreting the data themselves, ergo, they create the ability to hide things they dont want to display and vice versa, to pick up things they do.  That vaccine deaths are correlation, and that covid deaths are causation is itself, an interpretation.  Hence why Peru's numbers are changing based on advise from people internationally.


Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 06-02-2021

(06-02-2021, 05:29 AM)Thryleon date Wrote:You are asserting something yourself here.

That the statistics gathered are reliable accurate, and not embelished in any way shape or form.  That any potential deaths attributed to vaccinations are not attributed to vaccinations but other causes, and that any one who is listed as a covid death, died because they got covid.

Deliberately muddying long covid into there is a bit false.  The current batch are as asymptomatic as it gets unless they are reporting something I am missing.

You are confusing the data with the interpretation here.  You state the data doesnt lie, but those giving us the statistics are interpreting the data themselves, ergo, they create the ability to hide things they dont want to display and vice versa, to pick up things they do.  That vaccine deaths are correlation, and that covid deaths are causation is itself, an interpretation.  Hence why Peru's numbers are changing based on advise from people internationally.
It's not a conspiracy, there are not hundreds of thousands of health workers collaborating to paint a false picture, it's completely untenable for you to make that assertion, and you work in the health industry! Aren't you indirectly arguing that we can't trust you?

The hundreds of thousands collaborating to paint a false picture are the anti-vaxxers, cynics and radicals on FB and Instagram, and the media panders to them for profit.

The reported numbers are not interpreted, they are just reported as is. It's the sceptics and cynics doing the interpretations and distortions.

Long COVID, short COVID, weak COVID, strong COVID, deadly COVID and asymptomatic COVID are all COVID.

The infected here can thank their good fortune, and to date their better outcomes, that they are here in Australia and not India. You can thank your lucky stars you work in the Australian Health System and not Brazil, Peru, India, Turkey, etc., etc., etc..!


Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - ElwoodBlues1 - 06-02-2021

[quote author=LP link=msg=336225 date=1622611135]
If we are talking about here in Australia, yes every death is reported and accounted for.

It regards to the global statistics, it doesn't matter as long as the method of collecting them is consistent then the count remains valid.


Writing a death certificate and reporting a death are two different things..
It is a cause of death certificate not a comorbidity certificate.
Incidental diseases or medical conditions that the patient had but did not cause or contribute to the death
should not be included on a ‘death certificate but often they are when the cause of death is not verifiable without an autopsy and not every death that appears on a coroners inbox will get that far especially with the clogged waiting lists.