![]() |
|
CV and mad panic behaviour - Printable Version +- Carlton Supporters Club (http://new.carltonsc.com) +-- Forum: Social Club (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-6.html) +--- Forum: Blah-Blah Bar (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-23.html) +--- Thread: CV and mad panic behaviour (/thread-4651.html) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
|
Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - DJC - 06-02-2021 Just to be perfectly clear, the following is copied from the TGA website: Quote:The TGA uses its adverse event reporting system to closely monitor reports of death following COVID-19 vaccination. During the early stages of the vaccine rollout in Australia and many other countries, deaths were reported following vaccination in older people living in aged care as this is where the vaccine rollout started. Many of these deaths were in frail elderly people and were coincidental with vaccination. This was confirmed following review by the TGA and medicine regulators in the UK, Europe and the US which found no specific safety concerns from use of the vaccines in older people. So, it's true that 210 people died after immunisation but 209 of those would have died anyway. In fact, the number of people who died following immunisation is lower than would be expected from that cohort in the normal course of events. Another story that caught my eye was Peru revising its COVID death toll from 69,000 to over 180,000 "on the advice of Peruvian and international experts." The revised COVID death toll now correlates with Peru's excess death figures. Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 06-02-2021 (06-02-2021, 04:54 AM)DJC date Wrote:So, it's true that 210 people died after immunisation but 209 of those would have died anyway. In fact, the number of people who died following immunisation is lower than would be expected from that cohort in the normal course of events.Exactly, ironically it looks like being COVID-19 vaccinated decreases the general death rate. The reality is that it probably has no effect on the general death rate over the long term, it may change short term behaviour reducing the short term death rate. My friend who is a retired actuary tells me it's impossible to decode the cause and effect around the general death rate. For example, he said less people driving or travelling to work means less traffic deaths, but more people stay at home and climb ladders! Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Thryleon - 06-02-2021 (06-02-2021, 02:39 AM)LP link Wrote:There are no "vaccine deaths", there is one single vaccine death, your premise is based on a lie or misdirection about a statistic! exactly my point If you can massage the numbers to prove a point, you can do it on either side of the fence. Each COVID death that had co morbidity, means that COVID can be interpreted as cause of death, but they would have died anyway (assumption). Each case would be different, ergo, the same applies to those vaccinated but dead. Why count that number if its irrelevant? DJC states the following: Quote:So, it's true that 210 people died after immunisation but 209 of those would have died anyway. If that is also true of each COVID death, is COVID the killer virus its made out to be? Before you answer that question, ask yourself whether or not that question resonates with you in any way shape or form, and also, whether or not that is a healthy question to ask. You will find, that its actually the most appropriate question to ask, and the answer is hidden in statistics, massaged numbers, vaccinations, and foreign counts of people. Yet here we are in Australia, with rising case numbers, a new lockdown, and no one going to hospital with COVID. Why?? Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 06-02-2021 (06-02-2021, 05:04 AM)Thryleon date Wrote:exactly my pointOnly one side of the debate is massaging numbers, the fake news vendors. That is where you go wrong trying to paint it as a level playing field of information. It isn't a level playing field, all the information is not the same quality, in just the same way all opinions are not equal. The stats and numbers do not lie, they are not subject to human interpretation, influence or obfuscation, they are not like opinions that can be spun bent or twisted to an individuals will! The emphasis on wanting COVID-19 deaths proven to support or refute the COVID-19 restrictions and other actions is also flawed, it's built on the premise that COVID-19 infections that aren't deadly are somehow OK! The evidence suggests the long term effects of long COVID-19 will potentially be far far costlier than the initial deaths. As abhorrent as it may read, a funeral is far far cheaper than a treatment or long term critical care! Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 06-02-2021 (06-02-2021, 05:10 AM)ElwoodBlues1 date Wrote:The hospitals are encouraged to not report vaccine problems and find other conditionsThe problem statistic for that argument is as [member=324]DJC[/member] points out, total deaths have dropped. That statistic tears the concept you are asserting a new one! Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - ElwoodBlues1 - 06-02-2021 (06-02-2021, 05:12 AM)LP link Wrote:The problem statistic for that argument is as [member=324]DJC[/member] points out, total deaths have dropped. That statistic tears the concept you are asserting a new one!Do you think every death is reported...? Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 06-02-2021 (06-02-2021, 05:14 AM)ElwoodBlues1 date Wrote:Do you think every death is reported...?If we are talking about here in Australia, yes every death is reported and accounted for. It regards to the global statistics, it doesn't matter as long as the method of collecting them is consistent then the count remains valid. You are an engineer, I don't expect we have to debate Regression to the Mean or Standard Deviations, or what they mean to the general trend, or what averages mean to an assertion that some numbers might be missing or that the count was somehow imperfect. Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Thryleon - 06-02-2021 (06-02-2021, 05:10 AM)LP link Wrote:Only one side of the debate is massaging numbers, the fake news vendors. That is where you go wrong trying to paint it as a level playing field of information. It isn't a level playing field, all the information is not the same quality, in just the same way all opinions are not equal. You are asserting something yourself here. That the statistics gathered are reliable accurate, and not embelished in any way shape or form. That any potential deaths attributed to vaccinations are not attributed to vaccinations but other causes, and that any one who is listed as a covid death, died because they got covid. Deliberately muddying long covid into there is a bit false. The current batch are as asymptomatic as it gets unless they are reporting something I am missing. You are confusing the data with the interpretation here. You state the data doesnt lie, but those giving us the statistics are interpreting the data themselves, ergo, they create the ability to hide things they dont want to display and vice versa, to pick up things they do. That vaccine deaths are correlation, and that covid deaths are causation is itself, an interpretation. Hence why Peru's numbers are changing based on advise from people internationally. Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 06-02-2021 (06-02-2021, 05:29 AM)Thryleon date Wrote:You are asserting something yourself here.It's not a conspiracy, there are not hundreds of thousands of health workers collaborating to paint a false picture, it's completely untenable for you to make that assertion, and you work in the health industry! Aren't you indirectly arguing that we can't trust you? The hundreds of thousands collaborating to paint a false picture are the anti-vaxxers, cynics and radicals on FB and Instagram, and the media panders to them for profit. The reported numbers are not interpreted, they are just reported as is. It's the sceptics and cynics doing the interpretations and distortions. Long COVID, short COVID, weak COVID, strong COVID, deadly COVID and asymptomatic COVID are all COVID. The infected here can thank their good fortune, and to date their better outcomes, that they are here in Australia and not India. You can thank your lucky stars you work in the Australian Health System and not Brazil, Peru, India, Turkey, etc., etc., etc..! Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - ElwoodBlues1 - 06-02-2021 [quote author=LP link=msg=336225 date=1622611135] If we are talking about here in Australia, yes every death is reported and accounted for. It regards to the global statistics, it doesn't matter as long as the method of collecting them is consistent then the count remains valid. Writing a death certificate and reporting a death are two different things.. It is a cause of death certificate not a comorbidity certificate. Incidental diseases or medical conditions that the patient had but did not cause or contribute to the death should not be included on a ‘death certificate but often they are when the cause of death is not verifiable without an autopsy and not every death that appears on a coroners inbox will get that far especially with the clogged waiting lists. |