Carlton Supporters Club
CV and mad panic behaviour - Printable Version

+- Carlton Supporters Club (http://new.carltonsc.com)
+-- Forum: Social Club (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-6.html)
+--- Forum: Blah-Blah Bar (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-23.html)
+--- Thread: CV and mad panic behaviour (/thread-4651.html)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 03-18-2021

(03-18-2021, 06:29 AM)kruddler date Wrote:Are you admitting that its possible that some things, deemed safe by governments etc, could actually have some long term issues that are swept under the carpet!

Question everything!
 No, I was taking the piss!

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - kruddler - 03-18-2021

(03-18-2021, 09:05 PM)LP link Wrote:No, I was taking the piss!
So you are either admitted that governments and 'scientists' help cover up the negatives of smoking etc....or you are completely naive.

Which one is it?

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 03-18-2021

(03-18-2021, 09:10 PM)kruddler date Wrote:So you are either admitted that governments and 'scientists' help cover up the negatives of smoking etc....or you are completely naive.

Which one is it?
No, I just know you or others will bite after a loss, it's pointless having any serious topics discussed here today!

Of course, scientists are like any sector of society, is no different to any other. But the chains of decision making you imply are corrupt involve thousands if not tens of thousands of people involved, no one or few have enough control to corrupt the process. The globe isn't the USA, and Trump isn't pulling the strings.

The absence of evidence is not a sign of an even greater conspiracy, the QAnon world isn't real!

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 03-18-2021

(03-18-2021, 08:35 PM)flyboy77 date Wrote:Good on you.

But if you consider the three WTC buildings were brought down by planes you have a very limited understanding of basic physics - and chemistry for that matter.
Another ad hominem attack on a forum poster, who'd have thunk it!

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 03-18-2021

(03-18-2021, 09:59 AM)PaulP date Wrote:Yes, I agree. No human institution or cultural endeavour is infallible, but society has IMO become so bifurcated and partisan that any opinion or belief that doesn't agree with your own is the result of either corruption or incompetence, or both.
One of those bifurcated worlds is fantasy, existing only in damaged minds!

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - DJC - 03-18-2021

Who would have guessed?

The European Medicines Agency review of the Astrazeneca vaccine found that it is "safe and effective" is "not associated" with a higher risk of blood clots.

Of course, some politicians are still vacillating when they should be vaccinating.

SPLIT: 9/11 Debate - cookie2 - 03-22-2021

One or more of the messages of this topic have been moved to 9/11 Debate

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - cookie2 - 03-22-2021

Interesting that the efficacy / economics of the Sinopharm vaccine is now being questioned, the politics of biomed heating up again?

I'm almost certain the vast bulk of this speculation, Sinopharm, AstraZeneca, mRNA, etc., etc., will be more about dubious sales techniques than science, if you are having trouble getting a foot in the door spread an anonymous malicious rumour about the opposition! Wink

Post from LP.....Apologies, accidentally deleted original

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - ElwoodBlues1 - 03-22-2021

(03-18-2021, 09:38 PM)DJC link Wrote:Who would have guessed?

The European Medicines Agency review of the Astrazeneca vaccine found that it is "safe and effective" is "not associated" with a higher risk of blood clots.

Of course, some politicians are still vacillating when they should be vaccinating.
An agency that was jointly setup by Big Pharma and has a dubious history of not releasing any research data associated with its findings....not really a surprise they would approve AstraZ.
They were criticized over their handling of the HPV vaccine testing , they allowed drug companies to be their own judges and only the drug companies were allowed access to the research data in a code of secrecy.
They also like employing Big Pharma ex employees.....I would have a dollar or two on that without doing any research..?
https://corporateeurope.org/en/revolving-doors/2014/06/emas-revolving-door-big-pharma-alive-and-well.

I'd be very dubious of any research carried out or the integrity of the process involving the EMA....


Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - DJC - 03-22-2021

(03-22-2021, 06:02 AM)ElwoodBlues1 link Wrote:An agency that was jointly setup by Big Pharma and has a dubious history of not releasing any research data associated with its findings....not really a surprise they would approve AstraZ.
They were criticized over their handling of the HPV vaccine testing , they allowed drug companies to be their own judges and only the drug companies were allowed access to the research data in a code of secrecy.
They also like employing Big Pharma ex employees.....I would have a dollar or two on that without doing any research..?
https://corporateeurope.org/en/revolving-doors/2014/06/emas-revolving-door-big-pharma-alive-and-well.

I'd be very dubious of any research carried out or the integrity of the process involving the EMA....

Come on EB! 

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) is an agency of the European Union (EU) responsible for the scientific evaluation, supervision and safety monitoring of medicines in the EU.  It is probably world's best practice in ensuring independence with a management board of 36 who are completely independent of government and the private sector. 

EMA has seven scientific committees that are drawn from the relevant government agencies of each member country and they rely heavily on networks of scientific experts.  They have relatively few staff and don't employ ex-"big pharma" employees.

The European Ombudsman found that the complaint about EMA's safety review of HPV vaccines was without foundation and its "examination of scientific evidence was complete and it was independent."  Of course, the HPV vaccines have been in widespread use for some time now and are safe and effective.

Pharmacy companies contribute funding for the operation of EMA, as they should.  Why should taxpayers foot the bill for research into the quality, safety and efficacy of human and veterinary medicines?

Finally, the EU legislation that set up the EMA requires it to provide all EU citizens with access to all documents with the exception of personal, sensitive and commercially confidential information - almost exactly the same as our Therapeutic Goods Administration restrictions on releasing information.