![]() |
|
Blues Brothers trip to the tribunal - Printable Version +- Carlton Supporters Club (http://new.carltonsc.com) +-- Forum: Princes Park (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-4.html) +--- Forum: Robert Heatley Stand (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-14.html) +--- Thread: Blues Brothers trip to the tribunal (/thread-3789.html) |
Re: Blues Brothers trip to the tribunal - PaulP - 05-17-2018 (05-17-2018, 08:28 AM)ElwoodBlues1 link Wrote:On Wednesday night, Geelong superstar and AFL Players' Association president Patrick Dangerfield labelled the Tribunal's decision to clear Ed Curnow of intentional umpire contact "farcical" in the wake of Cats spearhead Tom Hawkins' one-match suspension on the same charge. Agree EB. Commentary bans should be in place for circumstances like this. It is absolutely trial by media. Imagine the outcry if Ed gets off ? Re: Blues Brothers trip to the tribunal - Professer E - 05-17-2018 Next time a cats players gets rubbed out maybe the club could tweet about the apparent leniency..... Re: Blues Brothers trip to the tribunal - Lods - 05-17-2018 Obviously theý're smarting from the Hawkins decision...but Geelong and it's supporters have been very vocal in driving the events of the last few days. One to put in the "Little Black Book" for when we play them. Re: Blues Brothers trip to the tribunal - Jack Burton - 05-17-2018 The AFLPA is supposed to represent ALL players. Do Carlton players feel they have adequate representation at the top of the AFLPA? Re: Blues Brothers trip to the tribunal - kruddler - 05-17-2018 So the AFL has said you can NOT make intentional contact with an umpire. Doesn't matter if is not forceful. Doesn't matter if the umpire never felt threatened. Doesn't matter if the umpire even remembers it. Doesn't matter if the umpire thinks it is not worthy of reporting. ANY INTENTIONAL CONTACT WITH AN UMPIRE is wrong and deserves a week. If that is the rule. So be it. No grey area. My counterargument.... ![]() Rules are rules AFL. Can't intentionally touch an umpire. Re: Blues Brothers trip to the tribunal - Baggers - 05-17-2018 (05-17-2018, 08:28 AM)ElwoodBlues1 link Wrote:On Wednesday night, Geelong superstar and AFL Players' Association president Patrick Dangerfield labelled the Tribunal's decision to clear Ed Curnow of intentional umpire contact "farcical" in the wake of Cats spearhead Tom Hawkins' one-match suspension on the same charge. Speechless that the AFLPA President would throw a player under a bus like that. But, then, Dangerfield really is all about Dangerfield. I'd expect nothing less from such an egocentric individual. It is strongly rumoured that when Dangerfield is making love to his partner he is imagining jerking off... ;D Re: Blues Brothers trip to the tribunal - cookie2 - 05-17-2018 (05-17-2018, 08:28 AM)ElwoodBlues1 link Wrote:On Wednesday night, Geelong superstar and AFL Players' Association president Patrick Dangerfield labelled the Tribunal's decision to clear Ed Curnow of intentional umpire contact "farcical" in the wake of Cats spearhead Tom Hawkins' one-match suspension on the same charge. Danger is working hard to earn his place in The Grand Order of Flogs. Re: Blues Brothers trip to the tribunal - PaulP - 05-17-2018 (05-17-2018, 09:21 AM)cookie2 link Wrote:Danger is working hard to earn his place in The Grand Order of Flogs. I like Danger, but he's pushing his luck in recent times. Just let your footy do the talking and leave the gobbing off for your post football media career. Re: Blues Brothers trip to the tribunal - LoveNavy - 05-17-2018 This series of events reminds me of the mating rituals of a female black widow spider. They mate then eat their partner..... Re: Blues Brothers trip to the tribunal - Baggers - 05-17-2018 Well at least Ed will know from all this who he can trust and who he can't trust, ditto Charlie. |