Carlton Supporters Club
CV and mad panic behaviour - Printable Version

+- Carlton Supporters Club (http://new.carltonsc.com)
+-- Forum: Social Club (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-6.html)
+--- Forum: Blah-Blah Bar (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-23.html)
+--- Thread: CV and mad panic behaviour (/thread-4651.html)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743


Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Thryleon - 03-15-2021

Guys you are peddling one assertion ahead of another.

The assertion that we are being told the truth about this vaccine and its side effects is likely the biggest fallousy we are being told about.

The worst still is that in lieu of other evidence countries with more severe covid issues than our own are pulling the same vaccine we are rolling out and for better or worse we currently don't have a virus to fight.

common sense states we shouldn't be using this vaccine irrespective of the assertion that its safe or are problem because even if it does the job they state it will, there is still every chance there are future unforseen consequences that can't be quantified right now and evidence is showing its borderline effective and the wrong mutation will render it useless anyway.


Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 03-15-2021

(03-15-2021, 01:31 AM)Thryleon date Wrote:common sense states we shouldn't be using this vaccine irrespective of the assertion that its safe or are problem because even if it does the job they state it will, there is still every chance there are future unforseen consequences that can't be quantified right now and evidence is showing its borderline effective and the wrong mutation will render it useless anyway.
Compared to all other vaccines not just COVID-19 vaccines, the COVID-19 vaccines are very safe. Safer than MMR, safer than Tetanus and safer than HPV. The rate of vaccination is extraordinary, and it's hard to ignore the stats. Until another like J&J  or Novavax reach vaccination counts in the tens of million authorities won't be able to make an equivalent comment, and we do not know about Pfizer because they aren't publishing the numbers which cannot be zero or that really stinks of something rotten.

I know the Global Health Initiative in partnership with Google is trying hard to open up all this data, if it does we will all get to read the standardised statistics.

All this has risen out of four diverse cases of clotting, not even the same clotting, it's ironic to think the dodginess only goes one way as [member=324]DJC[/member] rightly points out. Skip the opportunity to get ahead of the next wave, which is coming whether you like it or not, and you won't be worrying about the effects of the vaccine! I would have thought someone who works in a future potentially over-run hospital would be sensitive to that, the fact our hospitals aren't / haven't been over-run yet is the reason why we have such a good outcome!

Once Merck and GSK got involved, two companies that originally refused to take part because there was "nothing in it" from them, the waters have now been muddied. Is that coincidence? All of a sudden there is big dollars and it's worth the effort. Is this because they thought mRNA vaccines might not work, and they placed the wrong bet? Now they want to deal themselves back in!

There must have been quite a lot of ar5e kicking going on at Merck and GSK, they've let Pfizer, Moderna and AstraZeneca get a $Trillion head start!


Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - madbluboy - 03-15-2021

This reminds me of the video of Trump fans in different states chanting "Count the votes" or "Stop the votes" depending on if he was winning or not.

LP you keep talking about politics, authorities put people who died from all sorts of conditions down as covid despite knowing that's not what killed them and now they want to make excuses for people who have medical issues after receiving the vaccine.


Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - flyboy77 - 03-15-2021

(03-15-2021, 01:42 AM)LP link Wrote:Compared to all other vaccines not just COVID-19 vaccines, the COVID-19 vaccines are very safe. Safer than MMR, safer than Tetanus and safer than HPV. The rate of vaccination is extraordinary, and it's hard to ignore the stats. Until another like J&J  or Novavax reach vaccination counts in the tens of million authorities won't be able to make an equivalent comment, and we do not know about Pfizer because they aren't publishing the numbers which cannot be zero or that really stinks of something rotten.

I know the Global Health Initiative in partnership with Google is trying hard to open up all this data, if it does we will all get to read the standardised statistics.

All this has risen out of four diverse cases of clotting, not even the same clotting, it's ironic to think the dodginess only goes one way as [member=324]DJC[/member] rightly points out. Skip the opportunity to get ahead of the next wave, which is coming whether you like it or not, and you won't be worrying about the effects of the vaccine! I would have thought someone who works in a future potentially over-run hospital would be sensitive to that, the fact our hospitals aren't / haven't been over-run yet is the reason why we have such a good outcome!

Once Merck and GSK got involved, two companies that originally refused to take part because there was "nothing in it" from them, the waters have now been muddied. Is that coincidence? All of a sudden there is big dollars and it's worth the effort. Is this because they thought mRNA vaccines might not work, and they placed the wrong bet? Now they want to deal themselves back in!

There must have been quite a lot of ar5e kicking going on at Merck and GSK, they've let Pfizer, Moderna and AstraZeneca get a $Trillion head start!

That is shill 101 stuff LP. I hope to God you haven't got a Bill Gates poster on your bedroom wall.

Neither you, nor ANYONE for that matter, can empirically support a proposition that these vaccines are "very safe".

No one knows - there hasn't been time.

There are plenty of very eminent scientists who staunchly disagree with you and your 'friends'. That is a fact.

You do realise they are only able to be used due to EUAs which, I understand, can be withdrawn at any stage?

And that they remain in phase 3 testing?


Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - kruddler - 03-15-2021

As i spoke about with [member=105]Thryleon[/member] before this stuff started.

I am very pro-vaccination, but i will not be at the head of the line for this vaccine. I'll wait until the data comes in on how effective ti really is, and what the side effects are.

Better to wait for update 2.0 then be the first sucker to try a new product IMO.


Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 03-15-2021

(03-15-2021, 04:03 AM)flyboy77 date Wrote:No one knows - there hasn't been time.
All the vaccines are remaining in Phase 3, it is more a statement about the dud mentality of the law makers who never envisaged trials on such a large scale.

The shear number of vaccinations is very strong empirical data, that more than makes up for the shorter test regime. Usually Phase 3 is a perhaps 100,000 to 300,000 people over months or years. 320M over 3 months has that well and truly covered. It's the EUAs that permit that acceleration, because nobody writing the rules ever expected such huge trial data. I won't be surprised to find it never goes back to the bad old ways, based on laws from half a century ago!

Longitudinal studies can be compressed in time by increased participant numbers.

I realise Joe Average doesn't get the 320M over 3 months is the same as 80M over a year or 20M over four years, nor do they get Monte Carlo simulations or other analysis techniques.

Unfortunately for the sceptics, and fortunately for the rest of the world, the truth of the situation is exposed by the huge numbers already safely and effectively vaccinated, and it is very very real not just an allegation!


Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - kruddler - 03-15-2021

[member=153]LP[/member] ....
Numbers are one thing, but not all people are the same.

So just like nothing but a sample of 31yo males cannot be used accurately to predict how it will work amongst other members of the population, neither can numbers that exclude whole continents.

We are a smart monkey who has mastered many things.
100 years ago we could say the same, at the time, but how many things did we know back then that are just plain wrong nowadays. We hadn't even discovered blood types then.

What is it today that we don't know?
What is it that 100 years from now that we are doing that will seem like pure nonsense?

I'm all for science, but even science knows we don't know a hell of a lot.

So as good as all this appears to be....we simply do not really know.


Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 03-15-2021

(03-15-2021, 01:31 AM)Thryleon date Wrote:Guys you are peddling one assertion ahead of another.

The assertion that we are being told the truth about this vaccine and its side effects is likely the biggest fallousy we are being told about.

The worst still is that in lieu of other evidence countries with more severe covid issues than our own are pulling the same vaccine we are rolling out and for better or worse we currently don't have a virus to fight.

common sense states we shouldn't be using this vaccine irrespective of the assertion that its safe or are problem because even if it does the job they state it will, there is still every chance there are future unforseen consequences that can't be quantified right now and evidence is showing its borderline effective and the wrong mutation will render it useless anyway.
That is not technically correct. A coronavirus will always be a coronavirus, the vaccines issued now as already tested will always be effective to some degree.

Unfortunately, the media generalise the concept of immunity and misrepresent what the percentage effectiveness means. All the current vaccines are 100% effective at staving off the severe effects of COVID-19. As yet there are no numbers for any regarding preventing transmission, and it is interesting to see people boosting Pfizer ahead of AstraZeneca given the Pfizer trials data remains unreleased while the AstraZeneca data is public release.

if I were suspicious of anything, it would be the 98% effectiveness claimed by Pfizer, yet it's lauded by the media not questioned, despite there being insufficient data or time to know about the Pfizer vaccines it's ability to break transmission.


Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 03-15-2021

(03-15-2021, 05:26 AM)kruddler date Wrote:I'm all for science, but even science knows we don't know a hell of a lot.

So as good as all this appears to be....we simply do not really know.
Yet numpties want to accept the 1000 x 31 year old trial as proof something is NBG with one vaccine, but rail against the evidence from a good portion of 320M vaccinations! That is the definition of cherry-picking.

The experts know far more than the people willing to post spurious commentary here, commentary that feeds fear and inhibits uptake of something that might save someone's life, commentary that has a real world effect.

Words kill, stupid words even more so, .................... see Donald Trump or QAnon!

Unfortunately or fortunately, while the naysayers are free to cloud the commentary I'm free to clarify it.

Humans are awful at understanding risk [member=20]kruddler[/member], common sense is useless. For example give 320M people a raw carrot and many will choke with some dying, yet raw carrot is a healthy lunch for kids everywhere! Wink The USA has about 320M people, just by chance similar to the numbers vaccinated, in the USA about 12,000 kids choke on fresh fruit or veg requiring hospitalisation each year, some die. The number one choking fruit or veg is carrots, should we ban carrots and withdraw them from food stores and supermarkets. Should carrot farmers be charged with murder? In years gone by excess carrots, which store and transport very well, were shipped by wealthy countries to Africa to improve health and reduce some related dietary deficiencies that caused diseases, ........... those heartless bastards, how many kids choked!


Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - madbluboy - 03-15-2021

Numpties? Joe average?

Who do you think you are?