Carlton Supporters Club
CV and mad panic behaviour - Printable Version

+- Carlton Supporters Club (http://new.carltonsc.com)
+-- Forum: Social Club (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-6.html)
+--- Forum: Blah-Blah Bar (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-23.html)
+--- Thread: CV and mad panic behaviour (/thread-4651.html)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 02-07-2021

(02-07-2021, 11:20 AM)Thryleon date Wrote:I dont know if you've realized but the bigger and more answers you write, the less im reading.
As I stated my position to Flyboy77 once before, when he was posting conspiratorial social media founded rubbish, there is no chance I'll ever let that sort of thing slip by, because it's too dangerous to innocent people!

At least I've made my position clear and stand by it, arguing using whatever facts are available, not just opinion supported by opinion. I mean this whole argy-bargy started because I asked what evidence you would accept, I didn't even push that much to ask you what evidence you have to support your claims, I don't need to!

You are painting yourself [member=105]Thryleon[/member]‍, I've no need to paint or spin anything!


Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 02-07-2021

(02-07-2021, 10:49 AM)ElwoodBlues1 date Wrote:There are two valid reasons why Thry has a point about waiting and watching....the safety of the vaccine and unknown side effects as well as the effectiveness on a world scale.
I don't question that [member=57]ElwoodBlues1[/member]‍, as I stated to [member=105]Thryleon[/member]‍ getting vaccinated is a personal choice.

I don't think there is any evidence that the vaccines are unsafe, there may be a lot of social media opinion, Instagram and Facebook conspiratorial suspicions, but no reputable evidence that I can find that the vaccines aren't safe, not a skerrick.

Now almost 50M vaccine shots have been issued globally, Israel started almost 2 months ago and that is 5M people or about 50% of it's population, do you think that is not enough time or people to be building a case for or against! For me that is good enough evidence that the vaccine is safe, the reports are that where those vaccines are issued the infection and death rates are falling dramatically, for Thryleon it isn't enough. He wants more time, but more time comes at a risk also it isn't a free hit, do you think that risk of delay is a price worth paying? So I've asked a very simple question, what evidence does he require to accept that the vaccine is safe, in effect he answered nothing can be offered that can convince him! It's all there in the record of posts, or should I say isn't there in the record!

Can you answer that same question, what evidence do you require, when will you believe the vaccines are safe?

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - cookie2 - 02-07-2021

Read yesterday that the Germans are now considering use of the Russian vaccine (Sputnik)? May be due to supply problems for other vaccines in Europe.

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - PaulP - 02-07-2021

https://www.smh.com.au/sport/tennis/calling-off-the-open-would-have-been-catastrophic-tiley-says-20210207-p570ct.html

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 02-07-2021

(02-07-2021, 02:07 PM)cookie2 date Wrote:Read yesterday that the Germans are now considering use of the Russian vaccine (Sputnik)? May be due to supply problems for other vaccines in Europe.
It could be about supply, there is also a lot of politics and social management happening and this might be more about economics than anything else. Under EU rules EU countries have an obligation to trade with other EU nations, it might just be Russia using it's EU position to derive income via the vaccine. It might be purchased by Germany and never used, but that clears Germany of it's EU obligation, and would perhaps allow Germany to donate the vaccine as part of it's other international obligations.

There are not many published papers available regarding the Russian vaccine, it's a closed shop, I presume to get to the point of purchase somebody reputable must be doing a formal approval somewhere.

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Baggers - 02-07-2021

(02-07-2021, 12:52 PM)LP link Wrote:I don't question that [member=57]ElwoodBlues1[/member]‍, as I stated to [member=105]Thryleon[/member]‍ getting vaccinated is a personal choice.

I don't think there is any evidence that the vaccines are unsafe, there may be a lot of social media opinion, Instagram and Facebook conspiratorial suspicions, but no reputable evidence that I can find that the vaccines aren't safe, not a skerrick.

Now almost 50M vaccine shots have been issued globally, Israel started almost 2 months ago and that is 5M people or about 50% of it's population, do you think that is not enough time or people to be building a case for or against! For me that is good enough evidence that the vaccine is safe, the reports are where those vaccines are issued the infection and death rates are falling dramatically, for Thryleon it isn't enough. He wants more time, but more time comes at a risk also, do you think that risk of delay is a price worth paying? So I've asked a very simple question, what evidence does he require to accept that the vaccine is safe, in effect he answered nothing can be offered that can convince him! It's all there in the record of posts, or should I say isn't there in the record!

Can you answer that same question, what evidence do you require, when will you believe the vaccines are safe?

I don't think any vaccine, ever, has been 100% safe. There are always individuals, as few as they may be, who will have an adverse reaction. I vividly recall those recruit school days at HMAS Cerberus when all us newbies had to line up for our inoculations. And the lines consisted of about 200 or so young blokes, left arms bare, ready for the jabs. There was always three or four 'fainters' and the odd one who'd end up in sick bay for a few days. And we were given 3 shots at the same time, Yellow Fever, one I've forgotten and TB. I remember feeling a little crook for a day or two. Every now and then you'd hear of a bloke who had such a bad reaction he was discharged out of the Navy into a public hospital for special care.

It's not hard to see why so many folks are still skeptical of inoculations. We live in a world where we spend half our time sorting bullshizen information from truth. Plus we have so many different psychological types with their attitudes to science... from paranoid mistrust to blind faith. Likewise, governments.

Fortunately, as mentioned previously, we do have choice. Personally, I will have my shot when available for a variety of reasons as mentioned previously. Plus, my confidence is science is somewhat boosted by the effectiveness of my own experiences in PTSD treatments etc.

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - DJC - 02-07-2021

(02-07-2021, 09:28 AM)Thryleon link Wrote:Yet still spread it to no one else even those he lives with?

Do you guys not understand how ridiculous this sounds even if it is plausible?

Even when it comes from the head of the international quarantine organisation?

Symptom and infection variability are features of COVID - according to the scientific literature.

For example, the latest quarantine worker to test positive has a very low viral load and is unlikely to be infectious.

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - DJC - 02-07-2021

(02-07-2021, 09:37 PM)Baggers link Wrote:I don't think any vaccine, ever, has been 100% safe.

A young woman I worked with had her daughter vaccinated against polio but it resulted in the little girl contracting a mild form of polio.  As a result, the little girl had limited use of her legs and couldn’t walk unaided.  It was heartbreaking, particularly when the father pissed off and the young woman had to give up her job to care for her daughter.

Of course, the probability of that happening is minuscule but there is always a risk.

I will be getting my COVID vaccination as soon as it’s available.

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 02-07-2021

(02-07-2021, 09:37 PM)Baggers date Wrote:I don't think any vaccine, ever, has been 100% safe.
100% correct, like eating nuts or eggs, or driving a car.

Actually that is wrong, for in most cases a vaccine is far far safer than driving a car or eating nuts.

(02-07-2021, 09:37 PM)Baggers date Wrote:There was always three or four 'fainters' and the odd one who'd end up in sick bay for a few days. And we were given 3 shots at the same time, Yellow Fever, one I've forgotten and TB. I remember feeling a little crook for a day or two. Every now and then you'd hear of a bloke who had such a bad reaction he was discharged out of the Navy into a public hospital for special care.
True, but if you get zero reaction the vaccine probably isn't do anything beneficial, the reaction is the sign it is working. Of course a severe reaction is a problem as already mentioned.

Of course if the vaccines were as bad as the disease as some try to make out, you wouldn't be getting a handful of anecdotal cases, out of approximately 50M vaccinations you'd be getting tens of thousands of severe reactions. Not something anyone can hide!

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 02-07-2021

(02-07-2021, 10:29 PM)DJC date Wrote:For example, the latest quarantine worker to test positive has a very low viral load and is unlikely to be infectious.
Yes it's quite interesting, I read an article recently that also raised issues with the validity of the 14 day quarantine when operating rolling quarantine. People moving in or out of quarantine at different stages from the same location. The call was for quarantine in batches, but to do that effectively you need a separate isolated facility for each day of arrivals on a first in / first out basis. Is there anywhere in the world operating quarantine this way?

I did read that specific hotel floors are now being designated, the State Government is spending $M on altering ducting and airflow in these hotels, or shutting down whole floors when they share some circulation.