+- Carlton Supporters Club (http://new.carltonsc.com)
+-- Forum: Princes Park (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: Robert Heatley Stand (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-14.html)
+--- Thread: AFL Rd 8 2024 Post Game Prognostications Carlton vs Collingwood (/thread-6484.html)
Re: AFL Rd 8 2024 Post Game Prognostications Carlton vs Collingwood - kruddler - 05-07-2024
(05-07-2024, 09:13 AM)madbluboy link Wrote:I did write a lot of mistakes.
....and the voting replicated that with Walsh getting more votes than Acres. So the system works.
Point being, everyone makes mistakes. Even 2nd BOG players.
Re: AFL Rd 8 2024 Post Game Prognostications Carlton vs Collingwood - Milhanna13 - 05-08-2024
(05-05-2024, 12:53 AM)IvanAwfulbigone link Wrote:wait, wait, wait … just watched the Sunday Footy Show highlighting how they blocked Cripps at every centre bounce.
I mean, COME ON. If that sort of treatment doesn’t warrant a rule change I don’t know what does.
So the ball is NOT in play, there’s NO actual contest yet, in some instances the location was more than 10 metres away from where the ball was about to be bounced, and the opposing player did NOT have eyes for the ball.
So if you take your eyes off the ball and look at your opponent for a split second in a marking contest it’s a free every single time.
Also an instant free for “blocking” if the player’s path to a marking contest is impeded.
Why is that treated differently?
Of course, nothing new here - has been happening for years, and not just to Cripps. McCrae is portrayed as the good guy but I think this belies his Sheedy- or Clarkson-like approach to pushing things to the limit. He was even astute enough to make Pendlebury the blocker knowing he’s an ump favourite who has the footballing IQ to disguise the blocks.
Which brings me to Pendelbury’s last centre clearance - did he or did he not head straight for the boundary line?
Great observation from one commentator that doing that is win/win. If the ump pings him for “insufficient intent” it gives them time to set up behind the ball. If the ump is too gutless to make the call it’s a throw in just far enough away from goal.
This sh!ts me to tears most weeks (Steele from the 'aints is another who just turns and faces crippa at every bounce)
Was going to make the Pendles point, until i saw you beat me to it. They rarely call the hold, but they were definitely not going to ping Pendles. Ive made this point before, but Mccrae (and as you have pointed out Clarko), come from the same school of - hold him off the ball 100 times and you get pinged twice (or never, as was the case Fri night) - well it is worth it
Needs to be looked at. Crippa cant even scratch his nose, as he is being held that close, before the ump even thinks about bouncing the ball
Re: AFL Rd 8 2024 Post Game Prognostications Carlton vs Collingwood - LP - 05-08-2024
Finally some are starting to see what I've been watching for weeks now, and what tipped me over the edge was that Williams got pinged for two ultra-trivial holds, holds which were almost nothing by comparison to those which Cripps or Walsh suffered all game!
If we as fans and a club do not start asking these questions, we are going to keep finding ourselves at a significant disadvantage simply because Cripps, Walsh, Kennedy, Hewett, Cerra are at their very best in contested football situations. And the holding / shepherding stuff affects more of their game style than it does for a fast break type player.