+- Carlton Supporters Club (http://new.carltonsc.com)
+-- Forum: Princes Park (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: Robert Heatley Stand (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-14.html)
+--- Thread: Rd. 5 - Pre Game Thread - Blues V Dockers (/thread-2658.html)
Re: Rd. 5 - Pre Game Thread - Blues V Dockers - PassIt2Carrots - 04-23-2016
@kruddler
Mick gutted the list mate, and as it turns out, if what you say is correct, he ditched the wrong players!
There was nothing wrong with Ratten, he achieved many things, you just need to go back to your Ratten's objectives thread.
Re: Rd. 5 - Pre Game Thread - Blues V Dockers - kruddler - 04-23-2016
(04-23-2016, 11:11 PM)PassIt2Carrots link Wrote:@kruddler
Mick gutted the list mate, and as it turns out, if what you say is correct, he ditched the wrong players!
There was nothing wrong with Ratten, he achieved many things, you just need to go back to your Ratten's objectives thread.
He gutted it because it needed to be gutted. Too many passengers. Too many individuals.
Same thing that Bolton did.
If Mick had've ditched Henderson, Yarran, Bell, Menzel the pitchforks would be out in force! Because Bolton has done it....he gets the ok.
If Mick was allowed the freedom than maybe we wouldn't be where we are now.
What would you prefer to hear? The problem at the moment is Bolton??
Re: Rd. 5 - Pre Game Thread - Blues V Dockers - Raydan - 04-23-2016
(04-23-2016, 11:25 PM)kruddler link Wrote:He gutted it because it needed to be gutted. Too many passengers. Too many individuals.
Same thing that Bolton did.
If Mick had've ditched Henderson, Yarran, Bell, Menzel the pitchforks would be out in force! Because Bolton has done it....he gets the ok.
If Mick was allowed the freedom than maybe we wouldn't be where we are now.
What would you prefer to hear? The problem at the moment is Bolton??
C'mon Kruddler, Malthouse was allowed all sorts of freedom, Daisy, Jones, Tutt, Everitt who he even flew to see.
As for the others Henderson wanted to go, Bell wanted to go, Yarran wanted to go and Menzel wasn't a hard worker, something MM must have tolerared as he got a game weekly. Don't re write history to support your arguement
Re: Rd. 5 - Pre Game Thread - Blues V Dockers - PassIt2Carrots - 04-23-2016
Mick clearly got rid of the the wrong players because the problem is worse than ever! And not to mention all those players wanting to go.
Anyway, this thread is about to turn into possibly the 3 millionth MM thread so let's not go there. ;D
Re: Rd. 5 - Pre Game Thread - Blues V Dockers - kruddler - 04-23-2016
(04-23-2016, 11:32 PM)Raydan link Wrote:C'mon Kruddler, Malthouse was allowed all sorts of freedom, Daisy, Jones, Tutt, Everitt who he even flew to see.
As for the others Henderson wanted to go, Bell wanted to go, Yarran wanted to go and Menzel wasn't a hard worker, something MM must have tolerared as he got a game weekly. Don't re write history to support your arguement
Why did they want to go?
No, not because they didn't like Mick. They left after Mick was gone! Don't rewrite history to support yours.
They left because we were on their back about 'putting in' and they couldn't handle it. We thought it was in the clubs best interests to move on players who were not committed. Good riddance.
White puts in, was kept.
Ditto Army.
There is a very clear pattern of the players we kept and what they offer.
There is a very clear pattern of the players we let go and what they offer.
All the players who have been moved onto other clubs gave the club a reason to do so. This goes back further than Mick to include Fev.
Take a step back, look at the big picture and notice the patterns than span across multiple coaches. Its as clear as day.
EDIT:
Forgot to add this....What do you think would have happened if Mick went to the board and said he wanted to trade away Gibbs? Murphy??
What do think would happen now if Bolton asked the same thing?
Re: Rd. 5 - Pre Game Thread - Blues V Dockers - cookie2 - 04-24-2016
All evidence of the continued changing of the guard in terms of the club's playing list with the newer younger players coming in to replace the older guys. We'll be seeing even more evidence of it as BB gets more into his stride IMO. He knows he has to establish a completely new regime and that's a lot more difficult if too many of the old guard remain.
Re: Rd. 5 - Pre Game Thread - Blues V Dockers - PaulP - 04-24-2016
I get your drift, but it's soul searching.
Re: Rd. 5 - Pre Game Thread - Blues V Dockers - Robblues - 04-24-2016
(04-23-2016, 10:51 PM)crashlander link Wrote:Probably your best bet is on the 'net.Cheers Crash, might be the only here , was hoping to watch it, can't find any other seas sports channels streaming it . AFL it is
AFL.com.au send through stats and stuff. It is a frustrating way to deal with the game, but better than nothing.
There are other options on the 'net, some of which supply live vision. I can't remember their names: they are memory hogs (no surprise) and we run out of memory if I use them. :-[
Re: Rd. 5 - Pre Game Thread - Blues V Dockers - shadesy - 04-24-2016
Enough Now
This is the Round 5 thread. Hopefully we can put up a good show and maybe sneak a win. I think that would be best for all to get a win even though most accept where we are at.
Let's get behind Bolton and the Blues and move may other "Mick" talk to the Mick Threads.
Re: Rd. 5 - Pre Game Thread - Blues V Dockers - shawny - 04-24-2016
Fear a big loss coming.
They improved last week and while losing still pushed north who are undefeated and now back on their home patch they will smell an easy kill against us and must get some points.
If they play close to their capibilites with be a big win for them.
Would need a blinder for all senior guys to avoid a smacking.
Trying to be optimistic but just can't see it being even close this week.
Hope I'm Wrong.