+- Carlton Supporters Club (http://new.carltonsc.com)
+-- Forum: Princes Park (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: Robert Heatley Stand (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-14.html)
+--- Thread: Jim Park Analysis 2019 (/thread-4201.html)
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2019 - ElwoodBlues1 - 05-02-2019
(05-01-2019, 11:37 PM)Professer E link Wrote:Because Jones makes more mistakes than a kid with a Rubik's cube.
Think Jones takes the game on more and his mistakes tend to be more highlighted and stay in peoples minds...
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2019 - Professer E - 05-02-2019
True, and his first five games were very good but his most recent was poor. Weeters has also been bloody good this Year.
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2019 - flyboy77 - 05-02-2019
(05-02-2019, 02:46 AM)Professer E link Wrote:True, and his first five games were very good but his most recent was poor. Weeters has also been bloody good this Year.
You must have been watching a different games Prof.
A couple of blunders doesn't ruin an overall game and he was far from Robinson Carusoe.
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2019 - DJC - 05-02-2019
(04-28-2019, 04:58 AM)flyboy77 link Wrote:Surprised Weiters is ahead of Jones tbh....
Why?
Weitering has been the defensive general we’ve been missing, his intercept (and contested) marking has been very good and his work in moving the ball out of defence has been excellent.
Jones has been good but his work is generally one on one (although he does provide support to his fellow defenders) whereas Weitering is playing well in a much broader and more challenging role.
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2019 - crashlander - 05-04-2019
AFL Round 6: Carlton vs Hawthorn
The 2nd heartbreaker in 3 weeks really irritated me. We should have won. But we didn’t. By about 2 seconds.
Points of Interest:
[1] We had less voters this week, 12. This compared to 18 for this game last year. Disappointing.
[2] The ratings this week were all over the place. Some people considered that we played pretty well, while others thought we threw the game away. Fair enough: everybody has an opinion and our play was not easy to rate. The final rating was 7.89, which represents a C-.
[3] There were 14 vote getters this round. We had a lot of players who did something, but very few 4 quarter players. In the end, that was a reason we lost.
[4] Cripps ended up getting the votes, which surprised me somewhat. However, he couldn’t get the 300 votes this week.
Votes:
Cripps, Patrick 256
Thomas, Dale 184
Curnow, Edward 131
Kreuzer, Matthew 125
Walsh, Sam 122
Jones, Liam 102
Fisher, Zac 99
Weitering, Jacob 79
Petrevski - Seton, Sam 53
McKay, Harrison 16
Murphy, Marc 7
Newman, Nicholas 3
Plowman, Lachlan 3
Silvagni, Jack 3
Progressive Votes:
1889 - Cripps, Patrick (0)
783 - Weitering, Jacob (0)
777 - Petrevski - Seton, Sam (0)
580 - Jones, Liam (0)
553 - Walsh, Sam (0)
417 - McKay, Harrison (0)
372 - Fisher, Zac (0)
332 - Thomas, Dale (0)
315 - Curnow, Edward (0)
292 - Newman, Nicholas (0)
197 - Murphy, Marc (0)
154 - Kreuzer, Matthew (0)
110 - Dow, Patrick (0)
46 - Plowman, Lachlan (0)
42 - Casboult, Levi (0)
35 - McGovern, Mitchell (0)
30 - Phillips, Andrew (0)
22 - Setterfield, Will (0)
15 - Gibbons, Michael (0)
13 - Cuningham, David (0)
10 - Simpson, Kade (0)
5 - Marchbank, Caleb (0)
4 - Silvagni, Jack (0)
3 - Lobbe, Matthew (0)
Cripps has a lead of over 1000 votes at this point. My God!
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2019 - crashlander - 05-10-2019
AFL Rd 7: Carlton vs North Melbourne
What a disaster. Truly our worst performance of the year. Very little positive to discuss.
Points of Interest:
[1] We did have 11 players get a mention this week, but none of the performances really stuck out. Also very few 4 quarter efforts.
[2] The rating this week was 5.29, the worst for the year by some margin. This represents F+.
[3] There were 43000 people at Marvel on the weekend. And yet we play like that. We had 14 frustrated voted, 1 less than for the same round last year.
[4] This was Cripps' worst effort this year by some margin. He didn't get 200 votes for the first time this year. In fact, nobody did.
Votes:
Thomas, Dale 164
Cripps, Patrick 149
Fisher, Zac 125
Silvagni, Jack 117
Weitering, Jacob 77
Phillips, Andrew 49
Walsh, Sam 38
Jones, Liam 36
Cuningham, David 23
Casboult, Levi 11
Petrevski - Seton, Sam 4
Progressive Votes:
2038 - Cripps, Patrick (0)
860 - Weitering, Jacob (0)
781 - Petrevski - Seton, Sam (0)
616 - Jones, Liam (0)
591 - Walsh, Sam (0)
497 - Fisher, Zac (0)
496 - Thomas, Dale (0)
417 - McKay, Harrison (0)
315 - Curnow, Edward (0)
292 - Newman, Nicholas (0)
197 - Murphy, Marc (0)
154 - Kreuzer, Matthew (0)
121 - Silvagni, Jack (0)
110 - Dow, Patrick (0)
79 - Phillips, Andrew (0)
53 - Casboult, Levi (0)
46 - Plowman, Lachlan (0)
35 - Cuningham, David (0)
35 - McGovern, Mitchell (0)
22 - Setterfield, Will (0)
15 - Gibbons, Michael (0)
10 - Simpson, Kade (0)
5 - Marchbank, Caleb (0)
3 - Lobbe, Matthew (0)
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2019 - crashlander - 05-21-2019
Sorry I'm running a little behind this week: worked at the Election. Wish our result was like that was. Anyway, I've finally finished.
AFL Rd 8: Carlton vs Collingwood
We deserved to win, but we didn't. Less I say about the umpiring, the better.
Points of Interest:
[1] We had 16 voters this week, and everyone marked our effort higher than I did.
This round last year we had 17 voters. Considering that we were not on free to air TV, that is pretty good.[2] The rating this week was 8.69, the 2nd best for the year so far. Unlike next round that will probably be the worst rating ever. 8.69 represents a B-, which is excellent for a loss.
[3] This round 15 of the 22 players got a mention and probably deserved one. I do notice that no umpires would be getting a vote from any of us. We got the lest number of recorded free kicks, at the worst recorded ratio (8: 24, where Collingwood got 75% of all frees given).
[4] After a quiet first quarter, Cripps came got to get the votes again. He got a massive 462 votes for his efforts. That is amazing.
Votes:
Cripps, Patrick 462
Marchbank, Caleb 174
Kreuzer, Matthew 128
Murphy, Marc 111
Cuningham, David 95
Thomas, Dale 76
Silvagni, Jack 73
McGovern, Mitchell 43
Casboult, Levi 38
Weitering, Jacob 30
Curnow, Edward 22
Fisher, Zac 16
Plowman, Lachlan 16
Walsh, Sam 14
Gibbons, Michael 5
This was Marchbank's best game of the season by some margin.
Progressive Votes:
2500 - Cripps, Patrick (0)
890 - Weitering, Jacob (0)
781 - Petrevski - Seton, Sam (0)
616 - Jones, Liam (0)
605 - Walsh, Sam (0)
572 - Thomas, Dale (0)
513 - Fisher, Zac (0)
417 - McKay, Harrison (0)
337 - Curnow, Edward (0)
308 - Murphy, Marc (0)
292 - Newman, Nicholas (0)
281 - Kreuzer, Matthew (0)
194 - Silvagni, Jack (0)
179 - Marchbank, Caleb (0)
130 - Cuningham, David (0)
110 - Dow, Patrick (0)
91 - Casboult, Levi (0)
79 - McGovern, Mitchell (0)
79 - Phillips, Andrew (0)
63 - Plowman, Lachlan (0)
22 - Setterfield, Will (0)
20 - Gibbons, Michael (0)
10 - Simpson, Kade (0)
3 - Lobbe, Matthew (0)
Cripps is now 1600 votes ahead! Amazing.
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2019 - crashlander - 05-25-2019
Well, this week we really hit rock bottom. Not only was it a terrible performance with few redeeming features, but it inspired only 6 people to vote. I have never seen voter turnout this low. It is barely a third of a our normal voting population.
AFL 2019 Rd 9: Carlton vs GWS in Sydney
A 93 point loss. No excuses. Just poor.
Points of Interest:
[1] Only 6 people voted. That isn't even enough to smooth out the outliers. 16 voters voted this round last year (for another ordinary loss). Just not good enough.
[2] Few few players managed to get a vote. Only 8 guys got a mention and only two got a reasonable mention.
[3] This was the first game this year that Cripps did not get a vote. He till gas an enormous lead, but he played one of his very few really poor games.
[4] De Boer's game on Cripps showed the effect of having a really good player being shut down. We no longer even try that, much to our disservice. We really need someone to play this sort of game for us each week.
[5] The rating was exactly 5.0. Every single voter gave it an 'F'. That is the equal lowest rating I've ever seen.
Votes:
Newman, Nicholas 275
McKay, Harrison 217
Silvagni, Jack 92
Walsh, Sam 83
Kreuzer, Matthew 42
Fisher, Zac 17
Curnow, Edward 17
Casboult, Levi 8
What is there to say? I can at least be happy I didn't see this debacle.
From this point we have 2 choice: this can be our Manzikert, or it can be our Chippenham. I am hoping for Chippenham, but that assumes our leadership can emulate Alfred the Great. What I fear is that they are too much like Romanus Diogenes (the Roman Emperor who lost at Manzikert, a battle the Empire was never to truly recover from).
Progressive Voting:
2500 - Cripps, Patrick (0)
890 - Weitering, Jacob (0)
781 - Petrevski - Seton, Sam (0)
688 - Walsh, Sam (0)
634 - McKay, Harrison (0)
616 - Jones, Liam (0)
572 - Thomas, Dale (0)
567 - Newman, Nicholas (0)
530 - Fisher, Zac (0)
353 - Curnow, Edward (0)
323 - Kreuzer, Matthew (0)
308 - Murphy, Marc (0)
286 - Silvagni, Jack (0)
179 - Marchbank, Caleb (0)
130 - Cuningham, David (0)
110 - Dow, Patrick (0)
100 - Casboult, Levi (0)
79 - Phillips, Andrew (0)
79 - McGovern, Mitchell (0)
63 - Plowman, Lachlan (0)
22 - Setterfield, Will (0)
20 - Gibbons, Michael (0)
10 - Simpson, Kade (0)
3 - Lobbe, Matthew (0)
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2019 - crashlander - 06-04-2019
I'm running a little behind, but so much has happened recently that I'm not surprised that I am behind.
Round 10: Carlton vs St Kilda
Another one that got away.
I think one of the things that did Bolton in was the fact that we couldn't beat even an injury ravaged St Kilda, who demonstrated in China just how ordinary they are at the moment. That irritated me no end. But it was a LOT better than the alternative (what we produced against the Drug Cheats).Points of Interest:
[1] Voters returned this week. We had 14 voters, just one less than for the same round last year. That is a huge difference compared to last week, where only 6 people voted.
[2] This round 13 players deserved a mention. Again, compared to last week's pitiful effort, that is a huge step forward.
[3] Cripps was back in the votes this week, but he is definitely in a quiet patch. Hopefully the change in coach will allow him to get his form back.
[4] Sam Walsh also made a comeback of sorts, after a few ordinary weeks. He was 3rd in the votes this week, equaling his best result so far. Therein lies the future.
[5] The rating this week was also considerably better than last week: 6.69, which represents a D-. Considering how close we were, it appears that most voters were underwhelmed in our effort. Still, it is much better than F.
[6] Casboult managed one of his best vote getting displays, with 229 votes. he hasn't scored this high for a LONG TIME.
[7] Even though Daisy Thomas had been drinking two nights before the game, he still managed to be a useful player and get votes. Maybe they should all have had too much to drink?
Votes:
Cripps, Patrick 282
Casboult, Levi 229
Walsh, Sam 201
Curnow, Edward 69
Curnow, Charles 65
Gibbons, Michael 43
Cuningham, David 31
Simpson, Kade 24
Thomas, Dale 19
Newman, Nicholas 19
Marchbank, Caleb 14
Petrevski - Seton, Sam 5
Silvagni, Jack 2
Progressive Votes:
2782 - Cripps, Patrick (0)
890 - Weitering, Jacob (0)
889 - Walsh, Sam (0)
786 - Petrevski - Seton, Sam (0)
634 - McKay, Harrison (0)
616 - Jones, Liam (0)
591 - Thomas, Dale (0)
586 - Newman, Nicholas (0)
530 - Fisher, Zac (0)
423 - Curnow, Edward (0)
329 - Casboult, Levi (0)
323 - Kreuzer, Matthew (0)
308 - Murphy, Marc (0)
288 - Silvagni, Jack (0)
193 - Marchbank, Caleb (0)
161 - Cuningham, David (0)
110 - Dow, Patrick (0)
79 - Phillips, Andrew (0)
79 - McGovern, Mitchell (0)
65 - Curnow, Charles (0)
63 - Gibbons, Michael (0)
63 - Plowman, Lachlan (0)
34 - Simpson, Kade (0)
22 - Setterfield, Will (0)
3 - Lobbe, Matthew (0)
Re: Jim Park Analysis 2019 - crashlander - 06-10-2019
I seem to be getting a little behind too regularly for my tastes.
Rd 11: Carlton vs the Drug Cheats
Not one of our better efforts. We were pretty good until the rain came. From that point we were barely witch's hats.
As we all now know, that loss had considerable repercussions. And it may have more before the dust settles.
Points of Interest:
[1] 10 people voted for this round. Considering that we were on TV and playing at the MCG, that was appalling. However, when we play that poorly, there are consequences and this was one of them.
[2] The rating for this game was 5.17, which is barely better than an F. It wasn't the lowest rating of the year: that was against GWS. To be honest, I've never seen a rating as low as 5.00 before, but that effort probably deserved it.
[3] 12 different players rated a mention, something of a surprise. However, very few got more than just a 'mention'. It was hard to find players worthy of getting a vote after quarter time.
[4] Patrick Cripps had a career low number of possessions. That tells you a lot.
Votes:
Kreuzer, Matthew 230
Weitering, Jacob 225
Casboult, Levi 145
Walsh, Sam 39
Dow, Patrick 39
Marchbank, Caleb 26
Cuningham, David 21
Curnow, Charles 21
Curnow, Edward 10
McKay, Harrison 8
Newman, Nicholas 8
Stocker, Liam 5
Progressive Voting:
2782 - Cripps, Patrick (0)
1115 - Weitering, Jacob (0)
927 - Walsh, Sam (0)
786 - Petrevski - Seton, Sam (0)
642 - McKay, Harrison (0)
616 - Jones, Liam (0)
594 - Newman, Nicholas (0)
591 - Thomas, Dale (0)
553 - Kreuzer, Matthew (0)
530 - Fisher, Zac (0)
474 - Casboult, Levi (0)
433 - Curnow, Edward (0)
308 - Murphy, Marc (0)
288 - Silvagni, Jack (0)
219 - Marchbank, Caleb (0)
182 - Cuningham, David (0)
149 - Dow, Patrick (0)
86 - Curnow, Charles (0)
79 - Phillips, Andrew (0)
79 - McGovern, Mitchell (0)
63 - Gibbons, Michael (0)
63 - Plowman, Lachlan (0)
34 - Simpson, Kade (0)
22 - Setterfield, Will (0)
6 - Stocker, Liam (0)
3 - Lobbe, Matthew (0)