+- Carlton Supporters Club (http://new.carltonsc.com)
+-- Forum: Princes Park (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-4.html)
+--- Forum: Robert Heatley Stand (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-14.html)
+--- Thread: Players aint that smart are they? (/thread-3173.html)
Pages:
1
2
Re: Players aint that smart are they? - LoveNavy - 03-22-2017
(03-22-2017, 07:28 AM)DJC link Wrote:It's interesting to compare the treatment of De Goey with that dished out to Shaw and Didak; a minimum of four weeks after they both lied to the club.
At the time, Nathan Buckley advocated a harsher penalty:
The conspiracy theory doing the rounds is that Buckley knew about De Goey's involvement in the fracas and the dog story was concocted by the club to try to protect De Goey.
Seriously.... This mob is bound to come undone. At some point you can no longer recognise truth from lies, let alone who reported what to whom. Fascicle. Just fascicle.
Re: Players aint that smart are they? - kruddler - 03-23-2017
(03-22-2017, 07:28 AM)DJC link Wrote:It's interesting to compare the treatment of De Goey with that dished out to Shaw and Didak; a minimum of four weeks after they both lied to the club.
At the time, Nathan Buckley advocated a harsher penalty:
The conspiracy theory doing the rounds is that Buckley knew about De Goey's involvement in the fracas and the dog story was concocted by the club to try to protect De Goey.
Apparantly there are additional requirements enforced on DeGoey.
Must do some community service.
Will have to do some extended hours at the club (first one in, last one out type stuff - including VFL side) which could lead to 14 hour days on occasion.
$5000 fine.
I think its a fair whack.