(03-03-2017, 06:04 AM)LP link Wrote:I think we have too many players who do not want the shot, they have become gun shy as a result of too many relatively easy missed set shots.

I think we have a positive this year, we have many new faces who want to score goals. We just need the old brigade to give them the opportunities to do so!

(03-03-2017, 06:01 AM)flyboy77 link Wrote:what's the link for all theses stats please?

So if we improve the number AND QUALITY of the I50s and improve our conversion, we're a shoe in for the eight right!? 

(03-03-2017, 05:57 AM)PaulP link Wrote:As LP intimated, we sat 13th for I50's last season, 12th for marks I50, then 17th for goals, 15th for behinds.

We're simply not getting enough return for those entries. Again I ask, is it because of bad goal kicking, bad entries that make scoring harder etc. ?

(03-03-2017, 06:13 AM)sydneybluesfan link Wrote:IMO it's a combination of;

1 - having no quality KPF to who presents consistently and well for the mids to kick the ball to - so we bomb it.
2- no second and third string goal kickers who can consistently score [think Gunston, Clay Smith, LeCras] and make life difficult for defenders and spread them
3 - lack of pace and true crumbing forward
4 - poor goal kicking technique. Thus also leads to guys trying to pass the ball off.
5 - poor foot skills from the guys delivering ball into i50

On my stats we were 7th for marks inside 50 [12], but i reckon if you looked at marks inside 25 we would be bottom. We take a lot from long range which obviously means you miss a lot.
I'm of the view that without quality forwards you can have a great midfield and lot of i50's

(03-03-2017, 06:19 AM)sydneybluesfan link Wrote:Best sites for those looking for more data are;

http://afltables.com/afl/afl_index.html
http://www.footywire.com/
https://www.draftguru.com.au/ - an awesome database about trading and drafts.
http://www.matterofstats.com/ - incredibly detailed stats analysis

Have fun 

(03-03-2017, 06:13 AM)sydneybluesfan link Wrote:IMO it's a combination of;

1 - having no quality KPF to who presents consistently and well for the mids to kick the ball to - so we bomb it.
2- no second and third string goal kickers who can consistently score [think Gunston, Clay Smith, LeCras] and make life difficult for defenders and spread them
3 - lack of pace and true crumbing forward
4 - poor goal kicking technique. Thus also leads to guys trying to pass the ball off.
5 - poor foot skills from the guys delivering ball into i50

On my stats we were 7th for marks inside 50 [12], but i reckon if you looked at marks inside 25 we would be bottom. We take a lot from long range which obviously means you miss a lot.
I'm of the view that without quality forwards you can have a great midfield and lot of i50's

(03-02-2017, 06:41 AM)PaulP link Wrote:sbf, I know it's not trendy, I know it's probably daggy, but I have no faith that Casboult will fix his kicking now. He's been on the list 5, 6 seasons, plus the NB's before that, plus x years of junior footy, and still these chronic problems persist. I should also add, somewhat comically, that the Hawks under Clarkson didn't have all that recent success by following trends.

The FF in the goal square doesn't have to be every second of every game. I've said before Levi is great as a target after a behind is scored, on the wing etc. He could easily play a few different roles - just nothing that involves kicking for goal between 20-50m from goal.

Other teams know Casboult will be a nightmare in the goal square. It's takes his big Achilles heel out of the equation. He's an elite mark. He can easily hold his own in the rough stuff. He will never be left one on one in the goal square. He'll have at least 2, maybe 3 defenders watching him, because from there he'll mark anything and won't miss. He can even be used as a decoy if required. The F50 setup is critical - we need the 2nd and 3rd talls, and the goal sneaks all set up correctly. The ball delivery needs to be suited to the play. Flat and short to the 2nd and 3rd talls further away from goal. Higher and more helicopter style if going to the goal square, pricnially to avoid being picked off as an intercept by a defender.

I say we try it for a few games - it's not as if we're putting our flag chances in jeopardy by doing so.

(03-03-2017, 07:12 AM)PaulP link Wrote:So we can add you to the list of people who don''t like my "Cas in the goal square" idea ?