![]() |
|
CV and mad panic behaviour - Printable Version +- Carlton Supporters Club (http://new.carltonsc.com) +-- Forum: Social Club (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-6.html) +--- Forum: Blah-Blah Bar (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-23.html) +--- Thread: CV and mad panic behaviour (/thread-4651.html) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
|
Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - bratblue - 09-30-2020 Leave Ooshies out of it, someone caught a good snapper on one. Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Micky0 - 09-30-2020 You read the Herald Sun? And quote I assume Rita Panahi? Okay, enough said. Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - madbluboy - 09-30-2020 (09-30-2020, 03:35 AM)Micky0 link Wrote:You read the Herald Sun? And quote I assume Rita Panahi? What are you implying? Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Micky0 - 09-30-2020 (09-30-2020, 03:42 AM)madbluboy link Wrote:What are you implying?HS is a right wing leaning paper and Rita is a very poor excuse for a journo. Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - dodge - 09-30-2020 She's not a journalist - she's an opinionist. Doesn't have to abide by any rules of journalism, just writes whatever comes into her head - no accountability. She's done well for herself by just sprouting her opinions. I must admit that I agree with about 2% of them (which may be generous). Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 09-30-2020 (09-30-2020, 01:14 AM)cookie2 date Wrote:Without saying that masks are ineffective I have read in more than one place that they are not exactly at the top of the list of effective counter measures. One description was "like trying to catch mossies in chicken wire" , but I don't claim to actually know. I personally wear one as there is nothing to lose by doing so afaic.SARS-CoV-2 strains range from 50nm (Nanometres, Billionth of a Metre) to 200nm across, 1/5th to 1/20th the size of a micron. So in effect anywhere from 50 to 1000 of them fit across the width of a human hair. So to a virus the holes in the P2 mask material are like a person walking through the front entrance at Bunnings, but it's more complex than that................. We emit droplets which are basically sputum, each droplet is many tens of microns(~20um) if not hundreds of microns(~200um) across, think of a droplet about the width of a human hair. We emit dozens and dozens of droplets with every word we speak, each one can contain hundreds, thousands or even millions of virus. (There are 4.2 million cubic microns in a single 200um diameter droplet, each cubic micron can potentially hold a virus.) Droplets are the most common form of virus transmission. We also emit aerosols, these have a bit of a flexible definition but they are typically sub-micron (Smaller than one millionth of a Metre) in size, dozens or hundreds of aerosols fit across the width of a human hair. We emit thousands and thousands of aerosols with every word we speak or every breath we exhale. It's not clear whether aerosols contribute much to virus transmission, undoubtedly they do to some degree. To catch a virus you have to get the right does of virus in the right location. A droplet landing in your mouth probably doesn't have any effect, but an aerosol landing in your tear duct or lung probably can set off an infection. The masks will help stop droplets containing virus, but they might not stop virus if it is in aerosol form. But wait there is more, Whether a mask catches virus depends on a number of things provided the mask is correctly constructed; - If the mask is clean and dry, because virus are sticky they stick to clean dry surfaces if they come into contact. (So wear clean dry masks everyday.) - If the mask has some static charge, virus will be trapped, this depends on the material used and the construction. - If the mask has certain chemical properties the virus will be trapped, which depends on the material used. Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - cookie2 - 09-30-2020 @ LP And of course we have to consider the fact that "masks ain't masks". There must be huge variations in the type and construction of contraptions that are being being worn under the generic term "masks" so really is all this mask talk all that scientific anyway in terms of actual effectiveness? Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Baggers - 09-30-2020 (09-30-2020, 02:49 AM)LP link Wrote:[member=26]madbluboy[/member] She wrote it for that reason, it's cherry picking facts and presenting them out of context that feeds the nutter conspiracy theories, So I have no problem with [member=61]Baggers[/member] highlighting it! Have you seen, 'The Social Dilemma?' If not, I suspect you'd like it. Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Thryleon - 09-30-2020 The masks work for one simple reason. Making people wear them in public does more to stop people going out, than any other measure. Its uncomfortable, people dont like wearing them, and lets assume for a moment that they work with 50% capability of stopping the virus (its probably greater than that, but its irrelevant to the point I am going to write) you are better off wearing one than not. Simple stuff. The day masks became mandatory was the day my workplace (hospital) emptied of non clinical facing staff. A lot of the essentials all of a sudden became non essential and actually took themselves home to work. Not surprising, I hate wearing one for most of the day and end up isolating myself in an area where I can get away with working on site like I need to, only putting one on when I venture out into the business to work. Why didnt they go earlier? Being hospital staff, and delivering any service be it clinical or not, helps the machine of a hospital work. The staff dont order their own stuff, admin staff do. The staff dont audit things, admin staff do. The staff dont staff themselves, admin staff do. Systems administrators, people delivering key initiatives to transform the patient care experience all of a sudden up and started working from home. THAT is plenty of good reason to make them mandatory whether they function well or not. This isnt childsplay, its an infectious disease. The front line workers treating covid patients wear an n95, gown, gloves, face shield, and goggles and irrespective of how effective they are, they arent going to go in not wearing one, hoping like hell they aint going to catch covid. Rita makes some valid points. Heads probably should roll. Jenny was a sacrifical lamb, and irrespective of how you paint it, there should have been some more concrete analysis of what was going on, who was doing it, and how it was going to be implemented. Instead, it was silo'd operations with minimal consultation, and policy on the run. The Andrews government has made some errors here. Glossing over them is not a good look, but we need to ensure that its not change for changes sake, and make sure we understand why we are making said changes. Jacinda Ardern was front and centre of New Zealands strategy for good or bad. It was not, minister a vs minister b, or premier this or that. SHE was on the front foot. THAT is what leadership looks like. We have had absentee leadership for such a long time, that we have forgotten what it looks like. John Howard was the last competent prime minister we have had, and the rest have all be a revolving door of undermining nitwits who want the top job long enough to qualify for a juicy pension. We the people (read idiots) keep voting in these muppets and they have found the best way to get them all on the gravy train is leadership spill. We havent had a full termer for a very long time, and its about time we started asking for much better candidates because all of them suit the description of NERO. Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - cookie2 - 09-30-2020 (09-30-2020, 06:42 AM)Baggers link Wrote:Have you seen, 'The Social Dilemma?' If not, I suspect you'd like it. It's on Netflix, I might give it a whirl Baggers. |