+- Carlton Supporters Club (http://new.carltonsc.com)
+-- Forum: Social Club (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-6.html)
+--- Forum: Blah-Blah Bar (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-23.html)
+--- Thread: CV and mad panic behaviour (/thread-4651.html)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Baggers - 09-30-2020
(09-30-2020, 12:18 AM)madbluboy link Wrote:https://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/opinion/rita-panahi/rita-panahi-why-every-member-of-victorias-crisis-cabinet-must-go/news-story/4c679a19889b404146f88eaed14c389f
Sorry, MBB, but as soon as I saw the author of this article I knew it would be highly manipulative and agenda driven with convenient cherry picking to support her agenda. Bolt's understudy. Did she really write: Medical experts say wearing a mask when outdoors and socially distanced from others has no health benefits ????? Holy crap, what a bizarre and simply stupid thing to say, wearing masks isn't in and of itself a 'health benefit', it's a preventative measure FFS :
:
Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - PaulP - 09-30-2020
(09-30-2020, 12:31 AM)Baggers link Wrote:Sorry, MBB, but as soon as I saw the author of this article I knew it would be highly manipulative and agenda driven with convenient cherry picking to support her agenda. Bolt's understudy. Did she really write: Medical experts say wearing a mask when outdoors and socially distanced from others has no health benefits ????? Holy crap, what a bizarre and simply stupid thing to say, wearing masks isn't in and of itself a 'health benefit', it's a preventative measure FFS :
Agree, that whole enterprise is immeasurably ghastly. The modern version of Orwell's Two Minutes Hate.
Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - madbluboy - 09-30-2020
Why do you need to wear mask if you are alone outdoors?
Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - madbluboy - 09-30-2020
(09-30-2020, 12:31 AM)Baggers link Wrote:Sorry, MBB, but as soon as I saw the author of this article I knew it would be highly manipulative and agenda driven with convenient cherry picking to support her agenda. Bolt's understudy. Did she really write: Medical experts say wearing a mask when outdoors and socially distanced from others has no health benefits ????? Holy crap, what a bizarre and simply stupid thing to say, wearing masks isn't in and of itself a 'health benefit', it's a preventative measure FFS :
Didn't you just cherry pick one line out of her article to discredit her?
Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - cookie2 - 09-30-2020
Without saying that masks are ineffective I have read in more than one place that they are not exactly at the top of the list of effective counter measures. One description was "like trying to catch mossies in chicken wire" , but I don't claim to actually know. I personally wear one as there is nothing to lose by doing so afaic.
Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - PaulP - 09-30-2020
(09-30-2020, 01:14 AM)cookie2 link Wrote:Without saying that masks are ineffective I have read in more than one place that they are not exactly at the top of the list of effective counter measures. One description was "like trying to catch mossies in chicken wire" , but I don't claim to actually know. I personally wear one as there is nothing to lose by doing so afaic.
I think the general medical consensus is that they will have some effectiveness for what is essentially a respiratory illness spread by airborne particles. How much effectiveness is up for debate. But as you say, you lose nothing by wearing them. And if you move around in certain places, like supermarkets, maintaining a 1.5m distance the whole time is impossible.
Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Baggers - 09-30-2020
(09-30-2020, 01:11 AM)madbluboy link Wrote:Didn't you just cherry pick one line out of her article to discredit her?
That was no cherry... that was an elephant alone in a paddock! A line like that unravels a perspective in an instant.
And as for discrediting her... sheesh, she only has to open her mouth to prove her hard right agenda, same applies to the hard left journos as well - they refuse objectivity, rationality, fairness and broadness of vision. We've mentioned it before but she and her ilk are not journos, they're shallow click-bait merchants, that's all. Look at her pinup boy, A Bolt... defending Pell with every ounce of his click-bait energy. But I digress.
Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Baggers - 09-30-2020
(09-30-2020, 01:28 AM)PaulP link Wrote:I think the general medical consensus is that they will have some effectiveness for what is essentially a respiratory illness spread by airborne particles. How much effectiveness is up for debate. But as you say, you lose nothing by wearing them. And if you move around in certain places, like supermarkets, maintaining a 1.5m distance the whole time is impossible.
I think that is a good summary. And your example is perfect. Also applies to public transport.
I don't think face masks are meant to be or are seen as a panacea. Simply another defense against harmful airborne particles.
Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Baggers - 09-30-2020
(09-30-2020, 01:08 AM)madbluboy link Wrote:Why do you need to wear mask if you are alone outdoors?
What does it matter doing 180kms on the open road when no other cars are about?
We need blanket laws because too many of us are just plain stupid and will take more and more liberties.
Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 09-30-2020
(09-30-2020, 01:11 AM)madbluboy date Wrote:Didn't you just cherry pick one line out of her article to discredit her?[member=26]madbluboy[/member] She wrote it for that reason, it's cherry picking facts and presenting them out of context that feeds the nutter conspiracy theories, So I have no problem with [member=61]Baggers[/member] highlighting it!
There was quite a nice Podcast just recently, presented by a science reporter and discussing the despair that the flood of bogus "COVID Facts" on FaceCrook / Instafraud / Twatter is having on everyday people and friends. I think it was called Click-Sick.
The lies and half-truths that are relational (ie., correlated) are pasted so thick and fast people ignore the truth or just can't find it buried in the manure.
A reporter interviewed a former East German scientist, they were very concerned because to them the whole FaceCrook / Instafraud / Twatter COVID feed seemed very reminiscent of life in East Germany and the bombardment of official party lines and neighbourhood paranoia! Something they thought they had escaped by migrating away, but now they live with locals, some acting like the Stasi Party faithful while others act like insurgents!
A nice part of this Podcast was a discussion about how the 5G conspiracies emerged. It was launched by Russia as a disinformation tactic because the Russian economy is dead broke and can't spend enough to keep up with China and the USA on new technologies. They fear the rapid widespread adoption of 5G outside of their borders would leave their economy beached, so they spread disinformation to discredit the technology. At first on the border of Pakistan and India to leverage the fear and suspicion that exists between each side, little did they know the nutters would then attach 5G to COVID and a whole bunch of other things like 5G Microchip Trackers in your last vaccine shot! It seems the disinformation took off because the release of 5G coincided with COVID which appeared about the same time in late 2019, but by those rules of proof so did Baby Yoda and Ooshies! ;D :o