(06-10-2016, 09:20 PM)BlueAvenger link Wrote:Nicky G is depth at best for us and it's a real statement being made by the MC to bring Sumner straight in for him.

Graham is a bit of a one trick pony and really needs to watch extended footage of the Mitchells, Sam and Tom.

Needs to hurt the opp more when he has the ball and desperately needs to change his running patterns and use angles to create space due to his lack of foot speed and awareness. Want him to make it.

I'm glad that Jack S isn't getting a game yet. And boy oh boy where does that leave Jakcsh? Sheesh.

Want us to dominate these turds as they are my most hated team, stemming back to the Kosi, Milne and BJ days. Their supporters back in our dark days stick out like a sore thumb imo.

Smash em and bash em. I wouldn't mind 1AW ironing out Montagna ala Christensen  >

(06-10-2016, 09:43 PM)pinot link Wrote:Bit stiff on Graham - needs continuity in games. Need to do better in clearances and hitting the scoreboard. Sumner applies good forward line pressure but doesn't get much of the ball.

(06-10-2016, 12:12 AM)Barbs link Wrote:Also, I vote for naming him J-SOS. It has a certain ring to it 

(06-11-2016, 01:54 AM)kruddler link Wrote:With the saints outs and the lack of ins, we should really be working on our percentage this week!

Based on that statement alone, it makes this a 'danger game'.

(06-10-2016, 12:12 AM)Barbs link Wrote:............................

Also, I vote for naming him J-SOS. It has a certain ring to it 

(06-11-2016, 03:20 AM)PaulP link Wrote:I agree - it does sound good. The problem is, you have to be too flexible with the original acronym. SOS obviously stands for Son Of Serge. If you call him J-SOS, then it's Jack, Son Of Serge, which makes me feel squidgy, not to mention the fact that it leaves the door open for opposition supporters to make inferences that I'd rather not know about.

(06-11-2016, 03:28 AM)DJC link Wrote:If he's known around the club as SOJ, that's good enough for me