![]() |
|
CV and mad panic behaviour - Printable Version +- Carlton Supporters Club (http://new.carltonsc.com) +-- Forum: Social Club (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-6.html) +--- Forum: Blah-Blah Bar (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-23.html) +--- Thread: CV and mad panic behaviour (/thread-4651.html) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
|
Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - mateinone - 09-22-2020 (09-22-2020, 01:51 AM)Gointocarlton link Wrote:NSW went to court to make it illegal didnt they? They did and the rally had it overturned at the court of appeals Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Baggers - 09-22-2020 (09-21-2020, 11:59 PM)Gointocarlton link Wrote:Fair enough baggers but to MBB's point, why did the Gov let the BLM protest go ahead when clearly it was not in the best interests of the community from a H&S point of view given the circumstances. Everyone has a right to protest, however there are circumstances where it should be stopped and postponed during states of emergency. When I said c0ckheads who stuff it up for everyone else, that as far as I'm concerned, includes all protestors as well as the other clowns who just flagrantly break rules to visit mates or whateverthefck. And I sure don't think that Dan should have let that go ahead... no excuses. Like those other d1ckheads who got off without a fine recently... Dan only cr@ps in his own bed when his rules are so easily bent or compromised. Yes, everyone has the right to protest... but not when you endanger other lives/breaks the rules. If protestors have half a brain they can easily realise that there are many ways for them to get their message across without rooting up things for others during a pandemic, FFS. Sometimes I think some protestors are nothing more than malcontents who just want to have a whinge - and they fck it up for the ridgy didge folks... but that's an argument for another day. Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - madbluboy - 09-22-2020 (09-22-2020, 01:23 AM)LP link Wrote:Only if you broke the rules. I haven't broke the rules, I actually don't know of anyone who has despite dictator Dan saying we all know someone who has. Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - cookie2 - 09-22-2020 It may be me becoming an old curmudgeon but I am sick of political expediency overruling principle these days. OK it's probably always been an issue but it seems to have become much worse in recent times. Too much lying, deception and excuse making. Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 09-22-2020 (09-22-2020, 02:23 AM)madbluboy date Wrote:I haven't broke the rules, I actually don't know of anyone who has despite dictator Dan saying we all know someone who has.There is some irony in protesters wearing bandanna face masks while protesting face masks, which I believe is now breaking the law in Australia. Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - kruddler - 09-22-2020 I'm sick of all the political talk and grandstanding that runs along as a sideshow with COVID, specifically with Dan Andrews. People form an opinion based on which way they vote and what their party says.....and ignore the other side of things. A lot of the anti-Dan is simply anti-labour (not all mind you) dressed up in different clothing. I think it was GI2C who said its not about labour/liberal, its about doing the job from the position we are in and ultimately how that shapes up to people in power around the world. That is why i give him a B+. OK, he was 2 weeks to slow to jump on the second wave. 2 weeks. Donald Trump (an extreme example i admit) is what, 7 months too slow to do anything about it so far. China, Italy, England....how slow were they by comparison? If you mapped out how each leader handled it, he'd be near the pointy end (Hence B+) based on infections, actions and communication. Again, Perfect? No. But point to someone who has been perfect. Even if there is, there is still a Donald Trump on the other end of the spectrum. Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Gointocarlton - 09-22-2020 (09-22-2020, 07:48 AM)kruddler link Wrote:I'm sick of all the political talk and grandstanding that runs along as a sideshow with COVID, specifically with Dan Andrews.Absolutely shouldnt be a political issue K, this is a crisis which requires every man woman and child to do their bit and be unified for the safety of all. It lasted for a little while here in Vic, but as soon as the Libs smelt blood, it was on like donkey kong and quite frankly it makes me sick (pardon the pun). Perhaps I'm naive to think it not about politics, I just like to think that during times like these, community spirit can rise to the top. Obviously not. Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Baggers - 09-22-2020 (09-22-2020, 02:44 AM)cookie2 link Wrote:It may be me becoming an old curmudgeon but I am sick of political expediency overruling principle these days. OK it's probably always been an issue but it seems to have become much worse in recent times. Too much lying, deception and excuse making. Side by side with you on that one, Fluffy One. It's the most vulgar of opportunism that there is. Sadly, it will likely only get worse... many are buoyed by the Orange Rodent's success through lying and manipulation. We live in times when it would appear that Machiavelli is reborn. Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Baggers - 09-22-2020 (09-22-2020, 08:30 AM)Gointocarlton link Wrote:Absolutely shouldnt be a political issue K, this is a crisis which requires every man woman and child to do their bit and be unified for the safety of all. It lasted for a little while here in Vic, but as soon as the Libs smelt blood, it was on like donkey kong and quite frankly it makes me sick (pardon the pun). Perhaps I'm naive to think it not about politics, I just like to think that during times like these, community spirit can rise to the top. Obviously not. Sad but true, GTC. I don't even know the name of the leader of the Libs here in Victoria, but, sheesh, as you point out... as soon as a few things went wrong this bloke slithers out of the shadows and tries to score points. Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - mateinone - 09-22-2020 (09-22-2020, 07:48 AM)kruddler link Wrote:I'm sick of all the political talk and grandstanding that runs along as a sideshow with COVID, specifically with Dan Andrews. But isn't it also grandstanding or politicizing to suggest than anyone that thinks Dan should be gone is irrational? Not a dig, just a question. Quote:People form an opinion based on which way they vote and what their party says.....and ignore the other side of things. A lot of the anti-Dan is simply anti-labour (not all mind you) dressed up in different clothing. Would that include me, who is very vocal about poor Dan has been? Despite that fact I consider myself in the middle, I am in the middle left and if there were two equal candidates would vote labour. The 4 best politicians in my life from a Victorian or Federal level have been Bob Hawke, Little Johnny Howard, Jeff Kennett and Steve Bracks. 2 x ALP, 2 x Lib... but I was absolutely ALP in those days and would never have voted for Kennett or Howard. Quote:I think it was GI2C who said its not about labour/liberal, its about doing the job from the position we are in and ultimately how that shapes up to people in power around the world. Well does it need to be compared to people around the world. I mea I can't name so many other countries with the geographical situation of Victoria. No internationals (at all) after we stopped receiving them, there are not random boat people arriving on the shores of Portsea. We have almost non existant border breaches and that is with states who already have it completely under control. We had a virus with known infection rates completely under control, failed to quarantine it and then failed to act. Quote:That is why i give him a B+. OK, he was 2 weeks to slow to jump on the second wave. 2 weeks. Donald Trump (an extreme example i admit) is what, 7 months too slow to do anything about it so far. China, Italy, England....how slow were they by comparison? I don't even know why Donald Trump would be used in any comparison, or Putin or Iraq's leaders etc. I can't make an argument that Papa Doc was an B+ leader because he wasn't Stalin for example. I am not actually comparing Stalin with Trump or Papa Doc with Dan, I am just stating you can't make a comparison here. They have different powers, run vastly different geographical areas and even then, you are comparing with the worst. What about in comparison to Annastacia Palaszczuk Gladys Berejiklian Mark McGowan etc And if you really want an international leader, how close is Dan to Jacinta Arden? Your language suggests that 2 weeks is well not such a big deal, even when I suggest there is quite a reasonable chance that more than 50% of infections in the 2nd wave could still have been avoided by acting more quickly. And btw I think 2 weeks is being extremely generous to Dan, in reality he should have acted as early as 21-25 days sooner than he did. I am using that as the base timeline in my modelling, because it is that time by which he absolutely had no excuses at all, could be under no illusion at all, that this was community wide and a major infection requiring more than wet lettuce responses. At this stage we were already almost double the total of new cases at any stage within a 7 day period in the first wave which was 506 in the week. By the time we actually went into lockdown we were at 3177 cases over the previous 7 days for Victoria. I have no issue with you ranking him a B+ Krud, but I take issue if for example you were in any way suggesting my messages are politically bias. I genuinely think he has down an extremely awful job and almost certainly at least 300 (and probably over 400) of the lives lost, could have been saved with early action, against data that was irrefutable. So yes it is okay for your B+, I accept it as a reasonable representation of how you feel, but I certainly disagree. |