![]() |
|
Trumpled (Alternative Leading) - Printable Version +- Carlton Supporters Club (http://new.carltonsc.com) +-- Forum: Social Club (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-6.html) +--- Forum: Blah-Blah Bar (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-23.html) +--- Thread: Trumpled (Alternative Leading) (/thread-2312.html) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
|
Re: Trumpled (Alternative Leading) - Mav - 05-10-2017 (05-10-2017, 12:21 AM)Lods link Wrote:As for the investigation into the campaign ...wait and see...any attempt to cover it up will be very transparent.You mean like colluding with Devin Nunes to derail the House Intelligence Committee's investigation, trying to stop the Committee from calling Paula Yates from testifying, threatening her via Twitter before she testified etc. etc.? Re: Trumpled (Alternative Leading) - Lods - 05-10-2017 (05-10-2017, 12:30 AM)Mav link Wrote:Poor analogy. A better analogy would be: would it have been okay for Obama to sack Comey months before the election when he revealed the FBI was investigating Clinton's emails and then appoint a Clinton associate as FBI Director? Of course not. It would have appeared to be an attempt to kill an investigation of a Democrat. But this analogy falls short because Trump is the one with his nuts in the wringer rather than a colleague. We're really only arguing about the timing. You yourself described his handling of the Hillary stuff during the campaign as a "clusterfork" He was obviously unsuited to the position...."Democracy died in the USA" is a bit emotive isn't it? The investigation will continue... Those doing the investigation won't be silent if there is interference from upper levels. Democrats are already making comparison to Watergate and there is a comparison...These things will always come out eventually. Re: Trumpled (Alternative Leading) - Mav - 05-10-2017 Hmmm ... President sacks FBI Director who advises Congress that there's an ongoing investigation into his campaign. That's democracy at work. Why shouldn't he? The President is like an all-powerful king or dictator, isn't he? All he needs now is some way to get rid of tenure for Federal Judges so that he can appoint his own stooges and the US will have a true democracy. Re: Trumpled (Alternative Leading) - Lods - 05-10-2017 (05-10-2017, 12:53 AM)Mav link Wrote:Hmmm ... President sacks FBI Director who advises Congress that there's an ongoing investigation into his campaign. That's democracy at work. Why shouldn't he? The President is like an all-powerful king or dictator, isn't he? Trump's intention may indeed be to somehow affect the course of the investigation. We know how the bloke works. In fact in his letter dismissing Comey he refers to Comey having told him that he (Trump) wasn't being personally investigated. Why mention that at all! However the point remains Comey was not suited to the job. I'm just pointing out the strange behaviour of folks getting all heated, working themselves up into a lather (which is how most Democrats are approaching it), after being so critical of Comey at other times. Re: Trumpled (Alternative Leading) - Mav - 05-10-2017 As LP says, we'll have to wait to see who Trump nominates as the new FBI Director and whether the Republicans in the Senate will confirm that nomination. There are some absolute clowns that Trump could nominate: Sheriff Clarke, Rudy Giuliani and Chris Christie. Christie has been embroiled in Bridgegate over shutting down a bridge as political retribution against a mayor who didn't endorse Christie in his reelection campaign. He became a lapdog for Trump during his campaign and served as the butt of jokes over his weight. Rudy Giuliani might have been a qualified candidate given his previous life as a mob-busting prosecutor but he presented himself as an unhinged extremist as a Trump surrogate. Sheriff Clarke is an absolute nutcase. Nominating him would be like appointing a climate denier and EPA opponent as head of the EPA, which Trump has already done. Then the issue would be whether Mitch McConnell will kill the requirement for a 60% vote to confirm a nominee. He threatened to do this in order to confirm Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court although this ultimately wasn't necessary. Will he kill the 60% rule and bully the Republicans to vote to confirm en bloc? There's little doubt they won't be able to count on any Democrat Senators to vote in favour of any Trump stooge. Re: Trumpled (Alternative Leading) - Mav - 05-10-2017 By the way, in totally unrelated news, reports say that Grand Jury subpoenas have been served on associates of General Flynn over the last week regarding his business activities in Russia and Turkey. Re: Trumpled (Alternative Leading) - Mav - 05-10-2017 By the way, just because many think that Comey stuffed up by going public over Clinton's emails doesn't mean he should be sacked. FBI Directors are appointed for 10 year terms precisely to give them a form of tenure that will allow them to act independently of the White House. Yes, an incoming President usually replaces the heads of many agencies. But not the FBI Director. Only once has an FBI Director been sacked before the end of that term. Bill Clinton sacked William Sessions in 1993 but that was with bipartisan support. He had committed ethical violations by using the private FBI jet to visit his daughter (in the same way that Speakers such as Slipper and Bronwyn Bishop have been forced out). And never before has a President dismissed an FBI Director when the FBI was investigating the associates of the President. An FBI Director shouldn't have the Damoclean Sword hanging over his or her head, ready to fall for mere errors of judgement in performing the job as opposed to ethical violations. Apparently, Clinton had received firm advice prior to the election that she could not sack Comey if she won as it would be seen as a naked political revenge and she had accepted that advice. Re: Trumpled (Alternative Leading) - Mav - 05-16-2017 WTF ... The Washington Post reports that Trump disclosed "Codeword-Level" information (the highest level of security classification) to the Russian Foreign Minister and Ambassador in the meeting he held with them in the Oval Office last week, the day after sacking James Comey. Worse still, it seems he did this simply because he was boasting to them that he had all the best intel : ![]() It's alleged that he disclosed intelligence passed on by a Middle-Eastern ally regarding ISIS on the condition it not be revealed. The concern is that the Russians would then be able to figure out how the information was gathered and who was involved. Iran is an ally of Russia and Hezbollah is associated with Iran. Was the ally Israel or Jordan? Was the info about the concerns over laptop bombs? Should that ally suspend cooperation, it would be a blow for counter-terrorism efforts in the US and its allies (including us). The White House has tried to deflect but the effort is being pilloried in the media. General McMaster tried to attack a straw man argument by vigorously denying that Trump had revealed any sources or intelligence-gathering methods, something that was not alleged in the report. This is what you get when you have an ignorant and naive fool as POTUS. The Russians must think he is a "useful idiot". Reminds me of the old Get Smart series in which Max would reveal top secret info to KAOS without realising it. But Trump doesn't have Max's ability to bumble his way to success. Re: Trumpled (Alternative Leading) - LP - 05-16-2017 Well one thing is for sure, Trump is safe from Russian assassination attempts, he's just too valuable to them alive! ;D Re: Trumpled (Alternative Leading) - mateinone - 05-16-2017 I wonder what the odds would be on Trump to be impeached during his presidency? I reckon it would be worth having a few dollars on it, because he doesn't get the gravity of his situation. Oaths you swear and completely enforceable by law. He isn't in a business room now where he can lie, cheat bluff... If everything fails.. well start a new venture.. In this job he will be held accountable and I think he will end up impeached. |