![]() |
|
AFLW Rd 1: Carlton vs Collingwood at Ikon Park - Printable Version +- Carlton Supporters Club (http://new.carltonsc.com) +-- Forum: Lily Of Laguna (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-5.html) +--- Forum: Ladies Lounge (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-19.html) +--- Thread: AFLW Rd 1: Carlton vs Collingwood at Ikon Park (/thread-3607.html) |
Re: AFLW Rd 1: Carlton vs Collingwood at Ikon Park - flyboy77 - 02-04-2018 (02-04-2018, 10:14 AM)kruddler link Wrote:Say whatever you want. No scheisse Sherlock. You miss the point too.... Since when is the skill of kicking or handballing a footy i.e. hitting a target a function of strength? I was impressed by the tackling efforts btw. Re: AFLW Rd 1: Carlton vs Collingwood at Ikon Park - madbluboy - 02-05-2018 It's a shame you don't hold Levi Casboult to the same standards as these girls. Re: AFLW Rd 1: Carlton vs Collingwood at Ikon Park - PaulP - 02-05-2018 (02-05-2018, 12:21 AM)madbluboy link Wrote:It's a shame you don't hold Levi Casboult to the same standards as these girls. It guess it was only a matter of time before poor old Levi was dragged into the debate. I almost did it myself yesterday. Re: AFLW Rd 1: Carlton vs Collingwood at Ikon Park - kruddler - 02-05-2018 (02-04-2018, 11:53 PM)flyboy77 link Wrote:No scheisse Sherlock. You miss the point too....I think there is only 1 person missing the point, and that is you. I think you've forgotten what you actually said to begin with! (02-03-2018, 12:32 AM)flyboy77 link Wrote:As for Gee, gosh a good little runner but ran at an open goal but the kick barely went 12m! You are clearly talking about length of the kick, rather than the accuracy of it. Which is why we are having this strength debate. Re: AFLW Rd 1: Carlton vs Collingwood at Ikon Park - flyboy77 - 02-05-2018 No, I rest my case. I never said she should kick it 50 or even 40 or even 30.....pretty easy point to grasp really. For most. : :
Re: AFLW Rd 1: Carlton vs Collingwood at Ikon Park - Baggers - 02-05-2018 (02-04-2018, 11:14 PM)Navy Maven link Wrote:I agree with the gold coin donation, but not that it should go to a charity. That's kind of insulting actually. Do you think the men would play for unders and let the proceeds of their efforts be given away? We should certainly be charging a gold coin donation, but put that money back into the development of the women. The key issue with this competition is that the women aren't full time professional sports people. They only train twice a week and still work full time jobs. The only way this competition improves is if they are able to dedicate the same amount of time to perfecting their game as the men do. Fair call but I beg to differ. I don't think it would be insulting. In fact I suspect many of the women would be wrapped to know that some proceeds from their efforts would go to help worthy women causes. However, the core of my point was that the AFL has not demonstrated imagination in terms of reaping full benefit from the popularity of the ALFW. Of course a % of proceeds should be poured back into the further development of the competition. Even the men's comp has special affiliation rounds to show support to various community issues/charities - prostate cancer for one and I'm sure the players are happy that money raised from their efforts aids prostate cancer research. Perhaps, and I'm only brainstorming here/just thought starters, a certain % goes to further development but each round also buddies up with a given bona fide women's cause... this gives promotion to the cause and would encourage corporate sponsorship which brings in more money to also aid development. That's central to my argument, just apply imagination to marketing potential that could deliver both cause support and future development support. This grows the ALFW in other ways that can only help. I was not aware that bosoms are very resilient and localised trauma is not indicative of cancer risk (like a good boy, I did some research ) )... perhaps I've been too gentle over the decades ;DRe: AFLW Rd 1: Carlton vs Collingwood at Ikon Park - LP - 02-05-2018 A two week ban for the kick to the groin seems about right in a short season. If it had been the men I'd expect 3 or more, but 2 out of 7 or so AFLW games is a hefty penalty and appropriate. Re: AFLW Rd 1: Carlton vs Collingwood at Ikon Park - DJC - 02-05-2018 (02-05-2018, 02:50 AM)LP link Wrote:A two week ban for the kick to the groin seems about right in a short season. I think that it's too lenient LP. I realise that it's a short season but kicking an opponent, and particularly in the groin, deserves a more severe penalty. It looked bad and just the thing to stop mothers letting their daughters play footy. The AFL made a lot of noise about coming down hard on AFLW players that punch and they've let D'Arcy off with a slap from a wet lettuce leaf. I would have suspended her for the rest of the season. One mitigating factor is that she was given an almighty wedgie that should have earned her a 50 metre penalty. If that was paid in a timely manner, she probably wouldn't have kicked. The umpires seemed reluctant to pay obvious frees and 50m penalties. Perhaps they are umpiring to instructions. If so, the instructions need to change! Re: AFLW Rd 1: Carlton vs Collingwood at Ikon Park - kruddler - 02-05-2018 (02-05-2018, 01:46 AM)flyboy77 link Wrote:No, I rest my case. ...and i never said you did say that. You talked about length, not skills and were called out on it. Deal. Re: AFLW Rd 1: Carlton vs Collingwood at Ikon Park - LP - 02-05-2018 Molloy got the games MVP Nomination over Chiocci, I'm a bit surprised but I'm probably biased, and they both played well. |