![]() |
|
CV and mad panic behaviour - Printable Version +- Carlton Supporters Club (http://new.carltonsc.com) +-- Forum: Social Club (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-6.html) +--- Forum: Blah-Blah Bar (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-23.html) +--- Thread: CV and mad panic behaviour (/thread-4651.html) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
|
Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - kruddler - 09-08-2020 (09-08-2020, 09:55 AM)madbluboy link Wrote:We didn't listen? Is that you Dan? As a collective? Did we? I know i've done my part, but i know not everyone else has. You want him to name the individuals? Or is this a 'team game'. Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - kruddler - 09-08-2020 (09-08-2020, 10:04 AM)Baggers link Wrote:Leaders DO NOT do that, they lead, they take charge, they do what they know is in the public's best interest... and you never trust the public at large -- plenty of ripper folks but enough c0ckheads to fck it up for everyone else. NZ didn't hope, or pray, or wait - bang, both times Jacinda was onto it regardless of what people thought... and this a month out from elections - she risked being unpopular but knew what was best for the population and fckn jumped on it.See, you are in the lockdown camp. You are in the minority....i think. Most others say he has gone too hard on lockdown. In the end, its all just educated guesswork which we are learning on the fly. He can't win. Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - madbluboy - 09-08-2020 (09-08-2020, 10:24 AM)kruddler link Wrote:As a collective? Did we? I did my part like 99% of Victorians. Loonies will be loonies, you can't control them. If we put the same effort into the quarantine (You know the people who had the virus) as they did for "Freedom Day" we wouldn't be in lockdown. Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Lods - 09-08-2020 Looking at his 'road-map' from a distance I think his strategy might be to present a worst case set of standards. He can then soften the dates and bring them forward to a grateful state. Politically that's better than releasing too soon and actually have to keep to or tighten restrictions down the track. Make no mistakes, while the health considerations are still the most important element....'politics' is now a major player and will become increasingly so. And pollies we've praised will be shown to be the old self-serving mob they've always been. Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Thryleon - 09-08-2020 (09-08-2020, 09:28 AM)Baggers link Wrote:Right from the get-go of the lockdowns I was really impressed with Dan, ScoMo and other States... not so much NSW which fckd up the whole Ruby Princess thing but they quickly learned from it. Slight correction baggers. I think you'll find our worst days of positive cases happened after we started locking down again. Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Thryleon - 09-08-2020 (09-08-2020, 10:02 AM)flyboy77 link Wrote:It matters a lot - Cedar Meats, hotel quarantine, f... ups in contract tracing = incompetent. Actually it doesn't. The issue is so far behind us, it doesn't matter anymore. Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 09-09-2020 I notice the Oxford Vaccine has been pout on hold after a serious allergic reaction or side-effect suffered by a trial participant. These sorts of delays usually add months, and if not understood it can lead to a trial being cancelled, it'll be interesting to see what sort of impact it has in the current urgent environment. This is typical, and why it is very wise to be nervous or sceptical of rushed solutions. Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - PaulP - 09-09-2020 (09-09-2020, 03:20 AM)LP link Wrote:I notice the Oxford Vaccine has been pout on hold after a serious allergic reaction or side-effect suffered by a trial participant. These sorts of delays usually add months, and it if not understood it can lead to a trial being cancelled, it'll be interesting to see what sort of impact it has in the current urgent environment. So, so true. Beware the Trump magic vaccine, coming to you direct from the Nick Riviera centre for infectious disease. Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Thryleon - 09-09-2020 (09-09-2020, 03:44 AM)PaulP link Wrote:So, so true. Beware the Trump magic vaccine, coming to you direct from the Nick Riviera centre for infectious disease. Id be wary of any vaccine at the moment. Without knowing a lot about vaccines, or without being an expert on infectious diseases its unfathomable to me, that we would green light a vaccine for 25 million people on the current data. our infection rate is low. The cure could cause more issues than the disease. (09-09-2020, 03:20 AM)LP link Wrote:I notice the Oxford Vaccine has been pout on hold after a serious allergic reaction or side-effect suffered by a trial participant. These sorts of delays usually add months, and if not understood it can lead to a trial being cancelled, it'll be interesting to see what sort of impact it has in the current urgent environment. You know, to quote trump, this might just be fake news? I.e. they release a "set back" publically. Then when they announce that its a false alarm, its supposed to instill confidence that the appropriate checks and balances are being followed. Yet: https://www.statnews.com/2020/09/08/astrazeneca-covid-19-vaccine-study-put-on-hold-due-to-suspected-adverse-reaction-in-participant-in-the-u-k/ In a follow-up statement, AstraZeneca said it initiated the study hold. The nature of the adverse reaction and when it happened were not immediately known, though the participant is expected to recover, according to an individual familiar with the matter. advertisement The spokesperson described the pause as “a routine action which has to happen whenever there is a potentially unexplained illness in one of the trials, while it is investigated, ensuring we maintain the integrity of the trials.” The spokesperson also said that the company is “working to expedite the review of the single event to minimize any potential impact on the trial timeline.” An individual familiar with the development said researchers had been told the hold was placed on the trial out of “an abundance of caution.” A second individual familiar with the matter, who also spoke on condition of anonymity, said the finding is having an impact on other AstraZeneca vaccine trials underway — as well as on the clinical trials being conducted by other vaccine manufacturers. Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - mateinone - 09-15-2020 I have been tracking this virus here and globally since March and I can tell you this. There was absolutely no way that Dan and his team should have failed to realise what was going to happen. They were using poor measurements for a start. I haven't posted here for a long time and I have littered my FB with stat after stat about this virus, to the stage where it is all I ever post about, so I don't want to do the same thing here ![]() But I have serious questions in the way the government has handled this and also how they refuse to provide any meaningful answers when questioned on it. I heard today (and it is in the road map) that they won't removed restrictions even if they hit targets before the dates mentioned as time is a factor, well I would like to know exactly what sort of factor he means here. His timeline of 14 days is already more than in reasonably required to understand where this virus is at and what the future holds of the coming 2-4 weeks, so what exactly is time above this 14 day period? Either the number is a save number to ease restrictions or it is not. I am very firmly in the camp that believes we need restrictions and right now need the lockdown. I thought it back in March, I thought it in June etc, so I believe that we should be in the lockdown we are in, but the pathway out... This is a huge crock and not only that, but I think there are severe failings in the modelling used and certainly it sits a fair way outside my own modelling and other modelling I have seen. But.. on Dan... If we have to be in stage 4 with 50 cases a day over 14 days (and I think 7 - 10 is more appropriate when measuring) when going down, then surely at around 50 cases per day over the averaging period (and in this case 14 is almost criminally unresponsive when a virus is ascending), then I would like to know why the government didn't act.. and I don't buy that they didn't want to risk the rage of the people, because it was highly predictable where the numbers were going to end up. Here are just a simple table of stats (and it is even worse when you look at 7 day averages) Average New Cases per day over previous 14 days. Jul 04: 50.29 Jul 10: 108.79 Jul 14: 154.36 Jul 17: 200.86 Jul 21: 266.79 July 23 - Mandatory Masks - Melbourne & Mitcham Shire Jul 25: 307.57 Jul 29: 366.50 Aug 01: 408.50 Aug 02 Stage 4 Melbourne lockdown. So let's say Dan didn't thinkn we needed harsh lockdowns at 50.. or 100 or 150.. I mean the reality is, they had plenty of time to introduce them and the people of Melbourne are paying a huge price for this. The impact on the mental health (forget suicides as a figure, look at the people who are developing other mental health issues that could take months or years to recover from) The impact on those not being tested for possible terminal illnesses etc The impact on the economy The impact on students And now the impact where the community is being punished for longer than it should be, because Dan didn't act. If Dan had implemented these policies even once we hit 200, the lockdown would not have lasted longer than 6 weeks. If he implemented at 100, then many hundreds of lives would have been saved. Even if he implemented stage 3 restrictions sooner, all evidence statistically showed that the numbers were significantly reduced in stage 3, then he would have been able to accurately model our way out of this virus. By not doing that, he is gun shy and it is insane. Mandatory masks and stage 3 restrictions should be implemented already by the end of this month. On October 1, at least with my forecasts suggest that the numbers at that time will be at a level that might be a little too high for stage 2 restrictions, but should be comfortably manageable for stage 3 (with mandatory masks). In late September or early October, Metro Melbourne should be between 5-15 average cases a day (7 day averaging period) and it is really hard to justify why they can't be in a similar situation to region Victoria, with the requirements of masks still. Just 2 last things. 1) People are sick of being blamed, but there is almost certainly a reason why the age demographics have the 20-29 age bracket as having the most infections, because they really are more likely to be breaking the rules and so more likely to be spreading it. So there is some truth in the public needing to wear part of the blame for the current situation 2) What are the triggers that will move Victoria back into heaving restrictions once they are eased? Will Dan Andrews fiddle whilst Victoria burns again, or will there be clearly defined cases numbers that are triggered to reintroduce restrictions and lockdowns? Anyway in the meantime, I hope everyone is staying safe, sticking to the plan and working to help everyone get out of the lockdowns, then I hope Dan Andrews actually acts in a transparent and logical way and starts to give you all back at least a semblance of your lives in early October. |