![]() |
|
Leadership Group 2018 - Printable Version +- Carlton Supporters Club (http://new.carltonsc.com) +-- Forum: Princes Park (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-4.html) +--- Forum: Robert Heatley Stand (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-14.html) +--- Thread: Leadership Group 2018 (/thread-3596.html) |
Re: Leadership Group 2018 - Gointocarlton - 02-07-2018 (02-07-2018, 12:52 PM)mateinone link Wrote:Nobody can ever justify the recruitment of Daisy and the money he has been paid. It has been an atrocious recruitment from the club, one of the very worst ever. That isn't saying Daisy doesn't try, it isn't saying that he isn't a role model, it isn't addressing any of those things. It is a simple fact that if one of your top 2-3 paid players isn't in the 10 most effective players at your club, you have made a horrible mistake. That top coin is meant to be for superstars, plain and simple. They should have the qualities Daisy is said to have AND be great footballers. Remember he was paid Dangerfield like cash.Harsh. I could name at least 10 that were 10 times worse IMO, but lets not go over all ground and railroad another thread. This is about leadership and from all reports within the club, Daisy provides it spades even if he isnt officially part of the leadership group. When Bolts came along, he talked about developing leadership density. I think this is progressing nicely and is reflected in A. the size of the group and the eventual passing of the baton to the younger blokes and B. SOS's recruitment of players with leadership qualities as well as football nous. Re: Leadership Group 2018 - flyboy77 - 02-07-2018 With you MIO, quite frankly the only reason he remains on the list imo is because of the dollars wasted by the Club in recruiting him.... Re: Leadership Group 2018 - Gointocarlton - 02-07-2018 (02-07-2018, 11:01 PM)flyboy77 link Wrote:With you MIO, quite frankly the only reason he remains on the list imo is because of the dollars wasted by the Club in recruiting him....I'm confused (not hard to do). Didn't his contract expire last year and he was given an 1yr extension? They could have given him the flick last year correct? If your assessment is correct, given how ruthless SOS with list management, he would not have been there this year IMO. Re: Leadership Group 2018 - PaulP - 02-07-2018 (02-07-2018, 11:27 PM)Gointocarlton link Wrote:I'm confused (not hard to do). Didn't his contract expire last year and he was given an 1yr extension? They could have given him the flick last year correct? If your assessment is correct, given how ruthless SOS with list management, he would not have been there this year IMO. http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/dale-thomas-has-done-enough-to-play-on-says-marc-murphy-20170823-gy2uny.html An old story, but the clause that guaranteed him a 5th season (2018) was dropped by Daisy, so he earned an extra season on merit. Having seen plenty of Bolton's pressers and other interviews etc., there's little doubt in my mind that Bolts likes Daisy and likes having him around. Re: Leadership Group 2018 - ElwoodBlues1 - 02-08-2018 Cotchin, Rance and Riewoldt wouldnt be my idea of a great leadership group but thats a premiership leadership group.....Cotchin became a sniper and the other two are bozo's IMO. Maybe great leadership in football is overrated.....or maybe as in Hawthorns case with Hodge, Lewis, Mitchell, Burgoyne etc its more valuable for a long cycle of success but not so important for a one off premiership. ie Richmond, Bulldogs... Re: Leadership Group 2018 - cookie2 - 02-08-2018 (02-08-2018, 12:29 AM)ElwoodBlues1 link Wrote:Cotchin, Rance and Riewoldt wouldnt be my idea of a great leadership group but thats a premiership leadership group.....Cotchin became a sniper and the other two are bozo's IMO. Interesting point EB. Will be interesting to see how tight the Tiggers hang this year. Re: Leadership Group 2018 - mateinone - 02-08-2018 (02-07-2018, 11:27 PM)Gointocarlton link Wrote:I'm confused (not hard to do). Didn't his contract expire last year and he was given an 1yr extension? They could have given him the flick last year correct? If your assessment is correct, given how ruthless SOS with list management, he would not have been there this year IMO. Daisy on 300k would be a reasonable investment. On the money he was brought in on, I am unsure how anyone can suggest there are 10 players 10 times worse. Worst footballers? Absolutely... Worse for impact to our list management? Hardly. It is getting into a Daisy bashing/protecting thread and I have more than contributed to that, so I will stop. But outside of even Daisy, you don't pay A Grade player dollars for a player just cause they are a good bloke and train well, or any other spiel like that. If you do.. you lose football games Re: Leadership Group 2018 - LP - 02-08-2018 (02-07-2018, 11:40 PM)PaulP link Wrote:http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/dale-thomas-has-done-enough-to-play-on-says-marc-murphy-20170823-gy2uny.html Shhhhh, you risk suffering ostracism for reporting a reality! :o Re: Leadership Group 2018 - kruddler - 02-08-2018 Just read the bold and know this in relation to Daisy. (02-07-2018, 08:51 AM)PaulP link Wrote:The point is though, those sorts of qualities are not the sole preserve of highly paid, contentious, injury scarred recruits - you can get players with those sorts of qualities without going down the Daisy road. (02-07-2018, 12:52 PM)mateinone link Wrote:Nobody can ever justify the recruitment of Daisy and the money he has been paid. It has been an atrocious recruitment from the club, one of the very worst ever. That isn't saying Daisy doesn't try, it isn't saying that he isn't a role model, it isn't addressing any of those things. It is a simple fact that if one of your top 2-3 paid players isn't in the 10 most effective players at your club, you have made a horrible mistake. That top coin is meant to be for superstars, plain and simple. They should have the qualities Daisy is said to have AND be great footballers. Remember he was paid Dangerfield like cash. (02-07-2018, 11:01 PM)flyboy77 link Wrote:With you MIO, quite frankly the only reason he remains on the list imo is because of the dollars wasted by the Club in recruiting him.... Again, all the criticisms of Daisy have come down to his pay packet. That is NOT his problem. It has become a huge problem for him for the extra pressure it has led him to receive. The only mentions of Daisy on this thread that do NOT involve his pay packet are overwhelmingly positive... (02-07-2018, 01:24 PM)Amers link Wrote:While Daisy is the topic of discussion, I thought I would throw this in here, a snippet from a training report (source BF) from earlier this week, while over in Tassie.... (02-07-2018, 10:27 PM)Gointocarlton link Wrote:Harsh. I could name at least 10 that were 10 times worse IMO, but lets not go over all ground and railroad another thread. This is about leadership and from all reports within the club, Daisy provides it spades even if he isnt officially part of the leadership group. When Bolts came along, he talked about developing leadership density. I think this is progressing nicely and is reflected in A. the size of the group and the eventual passing of the baton to the younger blokes and B. SOS's recruitment of players with leadership qualities as well as football nous. (02-07-2018, 11:40 PM)PaulP link Wrote:http://www.theage.com.au/afl/afl-news/dale-thomas-has-done-enough-to-play-on-says-marc-murphy-20170823-gy2uny.html So i've been pretty pro-daisy according to most. This is because, as highlighted above, i judge him based on what he does and what he brings. I don't judge him on how much he is being played. Again, if you have an issue with his pay packet, blame the ones who paid him the money. Just as it doesn't matter what position you get drafted, once you are on the list, its what you offer the club that matters. Take his pay packet up with the club, and let his footy and leadership do the talking. Re: Leadership Group 2018 - PaulP - 02-08-2018 The club bent over far too easily in their rush to get new messiahs. Daisy was coming off a 5 game season in 2013. He had surgery in November 2012, then again in May 2013, then returns to the VFL and injures the ankle again in Aug 2013. The club ignored the medical advice of it own doctor, who said no to Daisy......... With the benefit of hindsight, it beggars belief the club spent more than 30 seconds even thinking about his recruitment. And no, Daisy hasn't done anything wrong per se, but he is the main character in a lousy tale of woe, so he will be forever associated with the whole debacle. I didn't dislike Daisy as a Pie, and I don't dislike him as a Blue, but his recruitment was still a lame ar$se decision. Oh well - one can only hope the club has learned its lesson. http://www.afl.com.au/news/2013-08-19/doc-doubting-thomas |