![]() |
|
Trumpled (Alternative Leading) - Printable Version +- Carlton Supporters Club (http://new.carltonsc.com) +-- Forum: Social Club (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-6.html) +--- Forum: Blah-Blah Bar (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-23.html) +--- Thread: Trumpled (Alternative Leading) (/thread-2312.html) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
|
Re: Trumpled (Alternative Leading) - sandsmere - 03-05-2017 (03-05-2017, 02:24 PM)Mav link Wrote:Once you get caught out peddling falsehoods, I'm afraid you have little credibility. eg. Bill and Hilary Clinton. Re: Trumpled (Alternative Leading) - shawny - 03-05-2017 (03-05-2017, 07:28 PM)sandsmere link Wrote:eg. Bill and Hilary Clinton. ;D ;D 'I did not have sexual relations with that girl' And she's a snake as well. Suit each other. Re: Trumpled (Alternative Leading) - LP - 03-05-2017 (03-05-2017, 02:44 PM)cookie2 link Wrote:So how come you are prepared to take on board all the stuff about Russia influencing the US elections when, to my knowledge no serious proof or evidence has been tabled? Shouldn't that in your parlance be classified as conspiracy theory? If Trump divests himself of all his Russian assets some of the problems might go away, but at the moment his organisation has $B dependant on the kindness of Putin. Do you have faith that Trump will do the right thing when it comes down to a world view versus his bank accounts? Further, some of his key appointments work in oil and has a vested interest in what goes down in the major pipelines servicing Europe from Turkey and the Ukraine. In everyday terms it's called a conflict of interest and it's becoming more common in politics by the day. Just because some have gotten away with it in the past doesn't make this occurrence acceptable, better or more benign. When a decision has to be made about some events in that region, do you trust them to do the right thing by the people or the right thing by their accounts? Re: Trumpled (Alternative Leading) - cookie2 - 03-05-2017 (03-05-2017, 09:21 PM)LP link Wrote:If Trump divests himself of all his Russian assets some of the problems might go away, but at the moment his organisation has $B dependant on the kindness of Putin. I do not have any real faith in the Trump presidency and it should certainly be subject to the same levels of scrutiny that are applied to any other. However, if this is not done in the right way that scrutiny will be flawed and easily rebutted. Trump, imo, has already been subdued to the usual interests and will be directed by them, albeit possibly via different strategies. Those should start to become clear over the coming months and I await with interest! Re: Trumpled (Alternative Leading) - DJC - 03-05-2017 (03-05-2017, 01:46 PM)cookie2 link Wrote:Do you know who they are? Are you familiar with details of the case they are making. Or is that your off the cuff opinion? Like many folk, I sat up all night watching it happen and I have read many accounts including the "alternative truth" versions. The latter are written by fruit loops and, in many cases, fruit loops pursuing evil agendas. Re: Trumpled (Alternative Leading) - Mav - 03-05-2017 (03-05-2017, 02:44 PM)cookie2 link Wrote:So how come you are prepared to take on board all the stuff about Russia influencing the US elections when, to my knowledge no serious proof or evidence has been tabled? Shouldn't that in your parlance be classified as conspiracy theory?Investigations by private cybersecurity firms and experts concluded that Russian hackers were responsible. Guccifer 2.0, the hacker who claimed responsibility, only ever raised his head for these leaks and then popped up much later to declare that the file released by the former MI6 agent was nonsense. Surprisingly, experts have concluded this was just a fake identity used by the Russians to obscure their involvement. Funnily enough, the Economist revealed that 2 teams of Russian hackers had attacked the DNC independently: http://www.economist.com/news/united-states/21707574-whats-worse-being-attacked-russian-hacker-being-attacked-two-bear-bear. One interesting part of that report is: Quote:Previously unpublished analysis by SecureWorks gives some of the details. The groups took the day off on April 15th—which just happens to be the day Russia honours its military electronic-warfare service. Wow, why would Guccifer choose that day to take a break? ;D Maybe you should spend a bit of time on Google, Cookie. Perhaps Google Jessikka Aro, the Bundestag hacks, and the recent history of Russia's information war with the West and the Baltic states. You could find stuff like this: http://www.politico.eu/article/russian-influence-german-election-hacking-cyberattack-news-merkel-putin/ Re: Trumpled (Alternative Leading) - Lods - 03-05-2017 While you're googling it's probably a good idea to be aware of where the source is perceived to sit on the spectrum. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2014/10/21/lets-rank-the-media-from-liberal-to-conservative-based-on-their-audiences/?utm_term=.64de008fe2b0 Re: Trumpled (Alternative Leading) - cookie2 - 03-05-2017 (03-05-2017, 10:28 PM)DJC link Wrote:Like many folk, I sat up all night watching it happen and I have read many accounts including the "alternative truth" versions. The latter are written by fruit loops and, in many cases, fruit loops pursuing evil agendas. I would concede that there are "fruit loops", some with evil intent, who have latched on the this and tried to make mileage out of it, although I don't really read the so-called alternative media. However there are other more credible sources backed up by expert input from such people as building demolition experts, structural engineers etc who have raised significant doubts as to the official version, enough doubts imo for me to reserve my judgement on it. Re: Trumpled (Alternative Leading) - cookie2 - 03-05-2017 (03-05-2017, 11:00 PM)Lods link Wrote:While you're googling it's probably a good idea to be aware of where the source is perceived to sit on the spectrum. Thanks but I pretty much aware of all of this. Re: Trumpled (Alternative Leading) - Mav - 03-05-2017 And remember that the left-wing has historically been the sworn enemy of Russia while the right-wing has always been pro-Russian. Or is it the other way around? ;D |