Carlton Supporters Club
CV and mad panic behaviour - Printable Version

+- Carlton Supporters Club (http://new.carltonsc.com)
+-- Forum: Social Club (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-6.html)
+--- Forum: Blah-Blah Bar (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-23.html)
+--- Thread: CV and mad panic behaviour (/thread-4651.html)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - kruddler - 08-27-2020

(08-27-2020, 12:49 PM)flyboy77 link Wrote:Rah, rah,

It goes back to the data, the chart. Undeniable stuff.

You can't get your head around it?

ok.

Stick to supporting the Blues.

You're an electrical engineer right?

I expected more sorry.
Electronic engineering was a past life, but the logic required sticks with me.

Data is one thing.
Interpretation is another.

I reject your interpretation.

....and you don't know what i believe, not even close.

Because i take issue with some of your points, does not mean i disagree with all of them.
Because i take issue with some conspiracies, does not mean i dismiss all of them.

Stick to talking facts and leave your interpretations out of it.

As for making me think? Don't flatter yourself.
I actually got into a fight with my wife the other day because i pointed out that the amount of media attention this gets is over the top compared to how deadly it is. My angle was from a strictly 'killer' point of view, there are too many other things that kill more on a daily basis. I don't think this is top 10.
However, by the same token, economically it deserves coverage as it is unprecedented.

That being said....i refer to my previous point....
Stage 4 occurred NOT because of an increase in deaths/cases, but as a measure to limit the long term economic damage. A stage 4 will get us back to a status quo quicker than a drawn out stage 3. Dan Andrews wants to end this sooner rather than later, and not draw it out.

THAT is something your table won't show.

Perhaps you should do some more thinking....

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 08-27-2020

This is hilarious! ;D

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - kruddler - 08-27-2020

(08-27-2020, 01:27 PM)LP link Wrote:This is hilarious! ;D
lol

I forgot to add...

*mike drop*
Wink

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Baggers - 08-27-2020

(08-27-2020, 12:49 PM)flyboy77 link Wrote:Rah, rah,

It goes back to the data, the chart. Undeniable stuff.

You can't get your head around it?

ok.

Stick to supporting the Blues.

You're an electrical engineer right?

I expected more sorry.

What a dreadful condescension. FB77, the amount of arrogance required to say that to K is breathtaking. Are you so glued to your opinion and perspective that you resort to a kind of intellectual snobbery toward anyone who doesn't revere your opinion and fall to their knees in agreement, as evidenced by such put-downs? Play the ball Cocko, not the man.





Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - cookie2 - 08-27-2020

C'mon guys, let's keep it civil.

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 08-28-2020

(08-27-2020, 11:38 PM)cookie2 date Wrote:C'mon guys, let's keep it civil.
My perception on much of this SARS-CoV-2 debate follows my observations about political debate on things like climate change, health and economics. It's clear some debate this in good faith, while others do not.

Seemingly the concept of debating in good faith is absent from much of the social media commentary, and absent from quite a lot of modern media reporting, that seems to be due to the lack of stewardship, ownership and curation. In the old days of reporting all media reporting had attached to it stewardship, ownership and oversight(curation). Anonymity is the main problem, nobody posting crap can be exposed or identified, they feel safe behind a wall of crap!

Modern social media likes to overload the concept of curation with paranoia, the idea that something that is edited is somehow tainted, but in reality serious curation improves content by throwing out he rubbish, while uncurated content delivers the message rubbish and all, which requires the reader to wade through and sort the rubbish from reality. In the extreme those debating without good faith flood the debate with crap, bastardised cherry picked selective facts and misinforation, it is not an accident, it is a deliberate tactic that relies on the reader assuming the total content is provided in good faith.

The worst case of debating without good faith is obviously Trump and Bannon, they basically fill the airwaves with crap. Bannon is alleged to have previously publicly stated his tactic is to fill the media with so much crap content that nobody can tell crap from substance, it's bad news for everybody because the vast majority of the public are not aware of this malintent.

The good news is simply this. Once you become cognisant of the fact that not all debate is engaged in good faith, you can quickly and easily start to recognise the patterns of malintent. That little bit of knowledge effectively exposes, flushes and thoroughly removes all the crap from the debate with almost zero effort!

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Lods - 08-28-2020

[member=153]LP[/member].
I'll just add the caveat that not all folk who take an opposing view are acting and debating in bad faith though.
They may be wrong but they actually believe in their words and actions.
The trick is to keep an open mind... read, watch, listen.
Once you close your mind to other opinions you immediately have a bias.
Bias often turns to hate.
And when you're a hater off goes your head and on goes a pumpkin.
That's when the problems start because you can find 'evidence' to support just about any point of view or conspiracy, no matter how ridiculous it might seem on the 'dark old web.'
...and something that we may believe to be true today may not be the case tomorrow.







Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 08-28-2020

(08-28-2020, 01:07 AM)Lods date Wrote:[member=153]LP[/member].
I'll just add the caveat that not all folk who take an opposing view are acting and debating in bad faith though.
They may be wrong but they actually believe in their words and actions.
The trick is to keep an open mind... read, watch, listen.
 True, the denial of genuine evidence like arguing against basic math is a real tell though!

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - Lods - 08-28-2020

(08-28-2020, 02:14 AM)LP link Wrote:True, the denial of genuine evidence like arguing against basic math is a real tell though!

Undoubtedly.
Be careful with Science though.
When I went to school Jupiter had 12 moons.
Now it's 79 and counting. ;D  ;D  ;D

Re: CV and mad panic behaviour - LP - 08-28-2020

(08-28-2020, 02:21 AM)Lods date Wrote:Undoubtedly.
Be careful with Science though.
When I went to school Jupiter had 12 moons.
Now it's 79 and counting. ;D  ;D  ;D
Yes no doubt, but that is a refined measurement not a deliberate misrepresentation.

The tell there is you accept the new measurement as new evidence, you don't continue to argue Jupiter has 12 moons.

I realise some might be mislead but dubious websites, and have real conviction in the argument, but putting blinkers on will hardly instill confidence in the motives behind the debate.

I'm more aware now about the mental health of the people that get involved in these debates, but I've no less conviction about debunking crap as it is remains the primary cause of the duress and many other troubles.