![]() |
|
Post Game Postulations: AFL Rd 7: Carlton vs Port Adelaide - Printable Version +- Carlton Supporters Club (http://new.carltonsc.com) +-- Forum: Princes Park (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-4.html) +--- Forum: Robert Heatley Stand (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-14.html) +--- Thread: Post Game Postulations: AFL Rd 7: Carlton vs Port Adelaide (/thread-4791.html) |
Re: Post Game Postulations: AFL Rd 7: Carlton vs Port Adelaide - Professer E - 07-19-2020 There's been a fair bit of nyah nyah nyah Carlton today, especially by "magnanimous" supporters of other clubs but I refuse to get riled by it this time. Because I genuinely believe that (1) we really didn't play well enough to win this and were lucky to be within four goals and (2) we're coming and they're starting to sh1t themselves at the prospect of a resurgent Carlton. Re: Post Game Postulations: AFL Rd 7: Carlton vs Port Adelaide - Thryleon - 07-19-2020 The fact this loss hurts is progress in itself. That Levi hit the post from 4 metres out sucked the life out of the team. We had kicked half of our score to that point. Re: Post Game Postulations: AFL Rd 7: Carlton vs Port Adelaide - blueday - 07-20-2020 We did ourselves no favors in the last five minutes. Having watched the replay. 1. Does anyone have any idea the the free kick against Harry was for in the last??! 2. The blocking by Port for Dixon was a master class, David King and the other idiots don't even mention this in their Dixon diatribe. Clubs get away with this, clearly something we should be investing more time in.e Go Baggers! Re: Post Game Postulations: AFL Rd 7: Carlton vs Port Adelaide - LP - 07-20-2020 (07-20-2020, 12:53 AM)blueday date Wrote:2. The blocking by Port for Dixon was a master class, David King and the other idiots don't even mention this in their Dixon diatribe. Clubs get away with this, clearly something we should be investing more time in.eI think it was either Gibbons or Martin who did the same for McKay/McGovern on a couple of occasions, on one they were penalised and on another they got away with it. I don't know how many times we got two players to the fall of the ball uncontested by opponents and spoiled each other, it shows a lack of voice because they can't blame the crowd noise at the moment! I don't know what to think of the umpire instructing the Port player to go back through the goals, how would that fair if it was the last moments of a GF and the scores were level? I must say, I'm not a fan of rules being applied subjectively, umpires are there to umpire not to coach idiots out of making stupid mistakes. Re: Post Game Postulations: AFL Rd 7: Carlton vs Port Adelaide - deags - 07-20-2020 (07-19-2020, 05:50 AM)Gointocarlton link Wrote:Yep. We definitely stole defeat from the jaws of victory. And if Levi Kicks his from right in front we win. Ifs ands or buts... Re: Post Game Postulations: AFL Rd 7: Carlton vs Port Adelaide - dodge - 07-20-2020 Deags - doesn't quite work that way re: Levi miss. We will never know what would have happened. What if Port kicked the first of there easy misses late in the last? We would have had more time to be attacking and get the goal back - or they might have kicked another. Who knows Re: Post Game Postulations: AFL Rd 7: Carlton vs Port Adelaide - madbluboy - 07-20-2020 Re: Post Game Postulations: AFL Rd 7: Carlton vs Port Adelaide - PaulP - 07-20-2020 The first 4 minutes approx of Access All Areas gives a brief report of the game. Re: Post Game Postulations: AFL Rd 7: Carlton vs Port Adelaide - madbluboy - 07-20-2020 (07-20-2020, 12:53 AM)blueday link Wrote:We did ourselves no favors in the last five minutes. Having watched the replay. Dal Santo mentioned an illegal block but then said he was okay with it not being paid. Re: Post Game Postulations: AFL Rd 7: Carlton vs Port Adelaide - Thryleon - 07-20-2020 (07-20-2020, 02:53 AM)madbluboy link Wrote:Dal Santo mentioned an illegal block but then said he was okay with it not being paid.They all pander to the umpires as its a difficult job. Dunstall was calling it out a bit more though. particularly the ones that could go either way. |