![]() |
|
Daisy charged for striking Laidler! - can accept 1 game suspension - Printable Version +- Carlton Supporters Club (http://new.carltonsc.com) +-- Forum: Princes Park (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-4.html) +--- Forum: Robert Heatley Stand (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-14.html) +--- Thread: Daisy charged for striking Laidler! - can accept 1 game suspension (/thread-2602.html) |
Re: Daisy charged for striking Laidler! - can accept 1 game suspension - LP - 03-17-2016 (03-17-2016, 07:44 PM)madbluboy link Wrote:$3.5 million now wowee!!! $Daisy go up with every grubber kick, a month from now Anderson will have him as the league highest paid player! ![]() Anderson doesn't even rationalise how we were able to sign a whole bunch of 2 or 3 year players in trade week, re-sign some senior players, all while still paying Daisy so much! That's because Mr Anderson is a goose! Re: Daisy charged for striking Laidler! - can accept 1 game suspension - PassIt2Carrots - 03-17-2016 (03-17-2016, 07:44 PM)madbluboy link Wrote:$3.5 million now wowee!!! Yeah that's overstated because the fifth year is our option is it not? Someone please tell me it's our option. @LP When blokes like Judd retire you can pretty much guarantee a large portion of salary cap space will be freed up. Re: Daisy charged for striking Laidler! - can accept 1 game suspension - ItsOurTime - 03-17-2016 Our option but if he comes good next year we have no alternative but to bay him 700k to go around again Re: Daisy charged for striking Laidler! - can accept 1 game suspension - cookie2 - 03-17-2016 (03-17-2016, 10:23 PM)ItsOurTime link Wrote:Our option but if he comes good next year we have no alternative but to bay him 700k to go around again I firmly believe that Daisy would have to make a pretty spectacular comeback for us to keep him a moment longer than we have to. He's a constant reminder of an era we are striving to put behind us and BB and SOS will be ruthless. Re: Daisy charged for striking Laidler! - can accept 1 game suspension - Thryleon - 03-17-2016 I reckon there is some dodgy mathematics being applied with regards to these contracts. I think people are looking at the years of contract combined with a figure we might have paid in one particular year (where front loading may have been performed) and multiplying by 5 to end up with a result that gives them ammunition to sling mud at our club. Daisy is rumoured to have been on anywhere between 600k and 750 a season. That doesnt mean he will get that money every season, but it might have been a figure he was on at this point. When you consider he was a restricted free agent, and Collingwood were only offering 450k a year plus bonuses (using this article as a relevant point) why would we indeed have gone double? The answer is most likely that we havent. I believe his actual contract would be closer to 600k a year (still too much for what we have gotten/getting) and that there is a bit of creative accounting being used everywhere to simply pot the club like people are used to doing. Front loading may have put him on a big packet in one season, but that would have had as much to do with us having cap wiggle room as anything else. We had Fev on 750k odd a few years ago, and we lured Judd at that time on a similar number, the cap space has increased quite signficantly since then, and we have no where near the salaries now that we did then. We must have heaps of room. We may have our biggest contracts being paid out as we speak leaving us signficant room available to play with moving forward which is all Im genuinly concerned about. Its possible that Daisy's 5th year might only cost us a few of hundred thousand as we have paid him the rest of his money already. We probably wont find out for sure but no doubt some will use this as ammunition against our footy club as there are certain media types that are constantly having a go at our footy club. They are effectively kicking us whilst we are down, and Daisy is an easy target because the footy he is producing is putrid, and he is on a high price even for a good ordinary footballer. Re: Daisy charged for striking Laidler! - can accept 1 game suspension - PassIt2Carrots - 03-17-2016 (03-17-2016, 11:17 PM)Thryleon link Wrote:That doesnt mean he will get that money every season, but it might have been a figure he was on at this point. When you consider he was a restricted free agent, and Collingwood were only offering 450k a year plus bonuses (using this article as a relevant point) why would we indeed have gone double? The answer to that is quite simple, he is Mick and Swann's son and Swanny wanted to complete the quinella re looking after his favourite people. Re: Daisy charged for striking Laidler! - can accept 1 game suspension - madbluboy - 03-17-2016 (03-17-2016, 11:17 PM)Thryleon link Wrote:I reckon there is some dodgy mathematics being applied with regards to these contracts. The numbers are completely made up by scribes in the media then exaggerated year by year with people with agendas. I mentioned about 12 months ago he will be on a million a season by the time his contract is finished, not far off now. Re: Daisy charged for striking Laidler! - can accept 1 game suspension - PassIt2Carrots - 03-17-2016 (03-17-2016, 11:29 PM)madbluboy link Wrote:The numbers are completely made up by scribes in the media then exaggerated year by year with people with agendas. I mentioned about 12 months ago he will be on a million a season by the time his contract is finished, not far off now. Nah I think the figures of 700-750k have been there from the start. People with agendas have tried to discredit those figures by throwing up 600k etc with little to no basis for their opinion. Re: Daisy charged for striking Laidler! - can accept 1 game suspension - madbluboy - 03-17-2016 (03-17-2016, 11:31 PM)PassIt2Carrots link Wrote:Nah I think the figures of 700-750k have been there from the start. They're made up just like these figures. http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-10-07/carlton-lodges-dale-thomas-paperwork-with-afl/5002596 Re: Daisy charged for striking Laidler! - can accept 1 game suspension - PassIt2Carrots - 03-17-2016 (03-17-2016, 11:33 PM)madbluboy link Wrote:There made up just like these figures. So only the figures that support your opinion are spot on? lol |