![]() |
|
R20 Brisbane v Carlton - Battle for the Spoon - Printable Version +- Carlton Supporters Club (http://new.carltonsc.com) +-- Forum: Princes Park (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-4.html) +--- Forum: Robert Heatley Stand (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-14.html) +--- Thread: R20 Brisbane v Carlton - Battle for the Spoon (/thread-2201.html) |
Re: R20 Brisbane v Carlton - Battle for the Spoon - ElwoodBlues1 - 08-14-2015 Weitering is a good footballer, played on men and held his own, beat Schache in the U18 Carnival and has some leadership skills which is what we lack...its a no brainer IMO and the no brainers are about the only picks we get right so we need to keep it simple and pick him which means engineering the No 1 pick.. Re: R20 Brisbane v Carlton - Battle for the Spoon - Thryleon - 08-14-2015 (08-14-2015, 07:54 AM)cimm1979 link Wrote:Do you live in a cloud kingdom full of lollipop horses? That's the best dream scenario you could come up with? The playboy mansion as heffner's heir apparent would be my number 1 choice of fantasy dream land. The chances of it happening are small but with Brisbane aiming low, the chances increase. Re: R20 Brisbane v Carlton - Battle for the Spoon - Lods - 08-15-2015 I'm making up my mind on the 'list management' strategy tonight. Cripps plays.....we're going for the wins.(He'll beat them by himself) Cripps doesn't play....we're going for the pick.
Re: R20 Brisbane v Carlton - Battle for the Spoon - kruddler - 08-15-2015 (08-15-2015, 12:50 AM)Lods link Wrote:I'm making up my mind on the 'list management' strategy tonight. Cripps subbed out?? Re: R20 Brisbane v Carlton - Battle for the Spoon - Lods - 08-15-2015 (08-15-2015, 12:51 AM)kruddler link Wrote:Cripps subbed out?? Picks ![]() He copped a knock last week...hurt his shoulder. It would be quite easy for him not to make it or go out early. Re: R20 Brisbane v Carlton - Battle for the Spoon - ItsOurTime - 08-15-2015 (08-15-2015, 12:50 AM)Lods link Wrote:I'm making up my mind on the 'list management' strategy tonight. Ellard is a suspicious inclusion |