![]() |
|
Pick your best 22 players - Part 8 (Season over - wooden spooners) - Printable Version +- Carlton Supporters Club (http://new.carltonsc.com) +-- Forum: Princes Park (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-4.html) +--- Forum: Robert Heatley Stand (http://new.carltonsc.com/forum-14.html) +--- Thread: Pick your best 22 players - Part 8 (Season over - wooden spooners) (/thread-1674.html) |
Re: Pick your best 22 players - Part 3 (Wooden spoon favs 0-2) - kruddler - 04-14-2015 Time for a new poll. We've seen the first 2 games and we all wish we hadn't. > ![]() Now we get a chance to reevaluate who we think deserves a spot in our best 22. Ignore injuries, assume all players are fit and available for selection. Who would you pick to be in our best 22? Re: Pick your best 22 players - Part 3 (Wooden spoon favs 0-2) - kruddler - 04-14-2015 For the record, the recent 'pre-season' poll results are below. Starters: 40 or more votes... 5 - Judd - 49 (4.5%) 6 - Simpson - 49 (4.5%) 13 - Yarran - 49 (4.5%) 2 - Menzel - 49 (4.5%) 4 - Gibbs - 49 (4.5%) 40 - Jamison - 49 (4.5%) 23 - Henderson - 49 (4.5%) 3 - Murphy - 49 (4.5%) 33 - Everitt - 48 (4.5%) 39 - Thomas - 48 (4.5%) 44 - Carrazzo - 48 (4.5%) 17 - Rowe - 46 (4.3%) 18 - Jaksch - 46 (4.3%) 41 - Casboult - 46 (4.3%) 1 - Walker - 46 (4.3%) 15 - Docherty - 44 (4.1%) Probables: 25-39 votes 42 - Tuohy - 39 (3.6%) 8 - Kreuzer - 35 (3.2%) 35 - Curnow - 33 (3.1%) 28 - Bell - 33 (3.1%) 14 - Jones - 32 (3%) 9 - Cripps - 31 (2.9%) Possibles: 10-25 votes 43 - White - 26 (2.4%) 7 - Buckley - 22 (2%) 12 - Boekhorst - 17 (1.6%) 36 - Wood - 16 (1.5%) Probably not: 1-9 votes 22 - Tutt - 7 (0.6%) 21 - Sheehan - 5 (0.5%) 11 - Warnock - 5 (0.5%) 10 - Watson - 3 (0.3%) 27 - Armfield - 3 (0.3%) 25 - Smith - 2 (0.2%) 32 - Graham - 2 (0.2%) 38 - Byrne - 1 (0.1%) 34 - Walsh - 1 (0.1%) Highly unlikely: 0 votes 29 - Gowers - 0 (0%) 37 - Fields - 0 (0%) 30 - Johnson - 0 (0%) 31 - Dick - 0 (0%) 46 - Ellard - 0 (0%) 47 - Russell - 0 (0% 19 - Giles - 0 (0%) 16 - Viojo-Rainbow - 0 (0%) 20 - Holman - 0 (0%) 26 - Foster - 0 (0%) 24 - Whiley - 0 (0%) Re: Pick your best 22 players - Part 3 (Wooden spoon favs 0-2) - Juddkreuzer - 04-14-2015 No to Walsh!! ![]() Big bodied unit who will be a leader going forward. Re: Pick your best 22 players - Part 3 (Wooden spoon favs 0-2) - shadesy - 04-15-2015 (04-14-2015, 12:20 PM)Juddkreuzer link Wrote: No to Walsh!! He's the one I am really hoping comes on a bit. Obviously a knock on him as he was overlooked in the draft, but WA captain, big body. How's he gone in the practice Matches? Re: Pick your best 22 players - Part 3 (Wooden spoon favs 0-2) - kruddler - 04-17-2015 Not too many people have voted for this one. I was hoping to get a lot more people voting before our match with Essendon tomorrow which may skew a lot of peoples votes should we win. Re: Pick your best 22 players - Part 3 (Wooden spoon favs 0-2) - DJC - 04-17-2015 (04-17-2015, 11:21 AM)kruddler link Wrote: Not too many people have voted for this one. I was hoping to get a lot more people voting before our match with Essendon tomorrow which may skew a lot of peoples votes should we win. Perhaps our poor start has discouraged punters Kruddler. I know I'm not as enthusiastic as I was two and a bit weeks ago. It will be a pity if folk don't continue to take part in this exercise. I am looking forward to seeing how our opinions evolve over the season. Re: Pick your best 22 players - Part 3 (Wooden spoon favs 0-2) - flyboy77 - 04-17-2015 Most of us are in shock! Re: Pick your best 22 players - Part 3 (Wooden spoon favs 0-2) - raven19 - 04-17-2015 Just voted. Re: Pick your best 22 players - Part 3 (Wooden spoon favs 0-2) - PassIt2Carrots - 04-17-2015 Interesting that some don't have Thomas in their best 22! He's the second highest paid player at the club! ??? Re: Pick your best 22 players - Part 3 (Wooden spoon favs 0-2) - kruddler - 04-18-2015 OK, so still plenty of room to vote for your best 22. Now we are sitting 0-3 and are looking like wooden spoon favourites tag might be around for another week. I reckon there will be quite a spread of votes amongst now. Some 'nobodies' are suddenly in contention. Have at it. |